Upgrading of Communal Extract Fans in Mountain Halls Accommodation Buildings, Treforest Campus

This tender for upgrading communal extract fans offers a clear scope and objective criteria, but lacks detail on evaluation and sustainability aspects. Practical submission methods are not specified.

The tender appears generally compliant with standard procurement procedures for its value. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure is specified as open competition below threshold. Deadlines are provided, but a confirmation of the reveal date is missing. No disputes are noted.

The description of works is clear and specific, outlining the required tasks from removal to installation and commissioning. Technical requirements are well-defined based on the performance specification. However, specific evaluation criteria are not detailed.

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the content of the tender documents is not accessible, and the submission process is not fully elaborated.

The tender promotes fairness by being an open competition with a disclosed estimated value. The technical requirements are objective and based on the scope of works. There are no explicitly tailored requirements for specific companies, contributing to a good fairness score. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly confirmed.

While a deadline and contract start date are provided, the absence of information regarding e-submission and direct document URLs limits practicality. Financing information is not detailed, and the contract duration is relatively short, which may impact contractor planning.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, nor is it stated to be EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability in this procurement process.