Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Valsts pārvaldes digitālo pakalpojumu dizaina izstrāde. 2. kārta

Closed

Updated November 13, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
162022
Value
€375,351
Location
Latvia
Published
February 22, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 23, 2026

Tender Opening

March 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€375,351
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
72244000 — Prototyping services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€375,351
Duration
16 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€220,792
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
2,497 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Valsts pārvaldes digitālo pakalpojumu dizaina izstrāde. 2. kārta
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on the second stage of digital service design for public administration, emphasizing an innovation sprint process. A winning strategy will leverage demonstrated expertise in agile design, user-centricity, and a clear understanding of public sector digital transformation challenges. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority and a robust technical proposal are crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Accelerating Public Service Innovation through Agile Design

Delivering User-Centric Digital Solutions for Latvian Citizens

Expertise in Innovation Sprints for Efficient Digital Transformation

Key Opportunities
The 'innovation sprint process' is a key differentiator. Bidders who can clearly articulate their methodology and past successes with sprints will stand out.
The absence of specified evaluation criteria suggests a strong emphasis on the technical proposal and demonstrated experience. A well-structured and compelling technical submission is paramount.
The tender is funded by the European Regional Development Fund, implying a need for compliance and a focus on impactful, sustainable digital solutions.
The second stage nature of the tender suggests that prior work or understanding of the initial phase might be beneficial, or at least a clear demonstration of how this phase builds upon previous efforts.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring metrics. The focus must be on meeting all stated requirements comprehensively and demonstrating superior capability.

Thoroughly analyze all tender documents to infer implicit evaluation priorities. Focus on demonstrating excellence across all stated requirements, particularly in technical capability and innovation sprint methodology. Benchmark against best practices in public sector digital design.

High potential for competition given the nature of public sector digital transformation projects and the estimated value.

Develop a strong value proposition that highlights unique expertise, a streamlined approach, and a clear understanding of the Latvian public sector context. Emphasize efficiency and measurable outcomes.

The absence of explicit 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects' requirements means these cannot be primary differentiators, shifting focus to technical and innovation capabilities.

While not explicitly required, subtly weaving in how the designed services will contribute to broader societal goals (e.g., accessibility, efficiency leading to better public services) can add value without over-investing in areas not explicitly requested.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A firm with a proven track record in agile digital service design, user experience (UX) research and design, service blueprinting, and prototyping within the public sector or highly regulated environments. Experience with innovation sprint methodologies and a strong understanding of Latvian public administration context would be highly advantageous.
Key Requirements
Development and redesign of public administration digital services through an innovation sprint process.
Demonstrated experience in user research, user journey mapping, and service blueprinting.
Ability to deliver tangible design outputs (e.g., prototypes, wireframes, user flows) within defined sprint cycles.
Understanding of public administration digital transformation goals and challenges.
Submission of application, experience, technical, and financial proposals.
Key Discriminators
A highly refined and documented innovation sprint methodology tailored for public sector digital services.
Demonstrated ability to translate complex user needs and administrative processes into intuitive and efficient digital interfaces.
A strong portfolio showcasing successful digital service design projects for government entities, with clear metrics of success.
A deep understanding of the Latvian public administration landscape and its specific digital transformation challenges.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to designing digital services that are highly accessible (WCAG 2.1 AA compliant) and inclusive, ensuring all citizens can benefit, regardless of ability or digital literacy. This aligns with broader public service goals even if not a direct tender requirement.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Proposal & Experience

Provide detailed case studies of similar projects, emphasizing the innovation sprint process, user research methodologies, and tangible design outputs. Clearly articulate the team's expertise and relevant experience. Showcase a robust understanding of the innovation sprint lifecycle and how it will be applied to achieve the tender's objectives.

Understanding of Public Sector Digital Services

Demonstrate a clear grasp of the Valsts kanceleja's objectives for digital service design and the broader context of digital transformation in Latvian public administration. Reference specific challenges and opportunities within the public sector.

Innovation Sprint Methodology

Present a detailed, step-by-step plan for the innovation sprint process, including phases, deliverables, and how user feedback will be integrated. Highlight flexibility and adaptability within the sprint framework.

Recommendations6
Master the Innovation Sprint Process
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a detailed and compelling description of your innovation sprint methodology, aligning it directly with the technical specification's requirements. Showcase past successes with sprints and how they lead to efficient, user-centric design outcomes.

Significantly increases the perceived capability and relevance of the bid.
Infer and Address Implicit Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, meticulously analyze all tender documents to infer the contracting authority's priorities. Focus on demonstrating excellence in technical capability, user-centric design, and understanding of public sector needs.

Ensures the bid addresses the most important aspects for the contracting authority, maximizing scoring potential.
Showcase Public Sector Digital Design Expertise
HighMed effort

Provide concrete examples and case studies of successful digital service design projects within the public sector or similar regulated environments. Highlight how your solutions have improved citizen experience and administrative efficiency.

Builds trust and demonstrates a deep understanding of the client's context.
Proactive Clarification Questions
HighLow effort

Submit targeted clarification questions to the contracting authority regarding any ambiguities in the technical specification or inferred evaluation priorities. This demonstrates engagement and a desire for clarity.

Can uncover crucial information to tailor the bid and avoid misinterpretations.
Integrate Accessibility and Inclusivity
MediumLow effort

While not explicitly required, emphasize how the designed services will be accessible to all users, adhering to international accessibility standards. Frame this as a core principle of good public service design.

Adds a layer of value and demonstrates a commitment to broader public good.
Address the 'Second Stage' Context
MediumLow effort

Acknowledge that this is the second stage of a project. Frame your proposal as building upon existing foundations or addressing the next logical steps in digital transformation, demonstrating continuity and strategic thinking.

Shows foresight and an understanding of the project's lifecycle.
Competitive Positioning
Position your firm as the most agile and user-centric partner capable of rapidly delivering tangible design outcomes through proven innovation sprint methodologies. Emphasize a deep understanding of the Latvian public sector's unique digital transformation journey and a commitment to citizen-focused solutions.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • EU funding compliance required
  • Specific performance conditions apply

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
162022_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260222152126.pdf -- 98.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the development of digital service design for public administration, including application, experience, technical, and financial proposal submissions.

1. pielikums Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
1.pielikums_Tehniska_specifikacija-MK_VK_2025... -- 219.2 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the development and redesign of public administration digital services through an innovation sprint process.

2. pielikums Pretendenta pieteikumsDOC
2.pielikums_pretendenta_pieteikums_1.docx -- 35.0 KB

This document is a bidder's application form to participate in the public procurement for the development of public administration digital services, phase 2.

3. pielikums Finanšu piedāvājumsDOC
3.pielikums Finansu piedavajums_1.docx -- 35.0 KB

This document contains a financial offer form for the open tender "Development of Public Administration Digital Services. Phase 2" (ID: MK VK 2025/012 ERAF), requiring bidders to state their maximum contract price and confirm that all costs are included.

4.1. pielikums Testa uzdevums-sprinta aprakstsDOC
4.1.pielikums_testa uzdevums-sprinta_apraksts... -- 18.8 KB

This document contains a description of the content for an innovation sprint, outlining the problem, goals, participants, timeline, and deliverables for a design sprint within a public administration digital services development tender.

4.2. Testa uzdevums. Inovācijas sprinta norišu laika un darbu plānsXLS
4.2.pielikums-testa_uzdevums-sprinta_norisu_p... -- 9.9 KB

This document contains a detailed work and schedule plan for an innovation sprint as part of a public administration digital services design tender.

4. pielikums Testa uzdevumsDOC
4.pielikums_testa uzdevums_1.docx -- 87.1 KB

This document contains a test assignment for bidders to prepare an innovation sprint plan, including a content description and a timeline, based on the tender's technical specifications.

5. pielikums Pretendenta pieredzes aprakstsDOC
5.pielikums_pretendenta_pieredzes_apraksts_1.... -- 29.5 KB

This document is an appendix requiring bidders to describe their experience relevant to the tender for the development of public administration digital service design.

6. pielikums Piedāvāta personāla pieredzes aprakstsDOC
6.pielikums_piedavata_personala_pieredzes_apr... -- 27.6 KB

This document contains a form for describing the experience of proposed personnel for the tender "Development of Public Administration Digital Services Design. Phase 2".

7. pielikums Informācija par apakšuzņēmējiem un/vai personām un/vai piegādātāju ...DOC
7.pielikums_informacija par apakšuznemejiem_1... -- 30.9 KB

This document contains information about subcontractors and/or persons and/or participants in a supplier association for the open tender "Development of Public Administration Digital Services. Stage 2".

8. pielikums Apakšuzņēmēja/Personas apliecinājumsDOC
8.pielikums_apksuznemeja_personas_apliecinaju... -- 32.6 KB

This document contains a subcontractor's/person's declaration confirming their professional, technical, and organizational capabilities to fulfill their part of the awarded tender for the development of public administration digital services.

9. pielikums Vispārīgā vienošanāsDOC
9. pielikums_visapreja_vienosanas_projekts.do... -- 69.9 KB

This document contains a draft framework agreement for the development of public administration digital service design, outlining the selection process for service providers and contract terms.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_MK_VK_2025_12_ERAF.docx -- 292.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the development of digital public administration services, phase 2, funded by the European Regional Development Fund.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

Quality Score

Comprehensive quality analysis of this tender scoring legal compliance, clarity, completeness, fairness, practicality, data consistency, and sustainability on a 0-100 scale with detailed breakdown and recommendations.

Login