← Back to Tenders
Latvia0 days leftClosed

Development of Assessments, a Manual on Legal Matters, and a Quality Standard

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Tiesu administrācija

LOCATION

Latvia, Latvia

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

February 02, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

73000000

REFERENCE

162328

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Development of Assessments, a Manual on Legal Matters, and a Quality Standard
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidders must meet general exclusion criteria as outlined in the tender documents.
  • Bidders must not be subject to any exclusion conditions specified for Part 1 and Part 2 of the procurement.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must meet the general bidder requirements and eligibility criteria.
  • Bidders must satisfy the selection criteria for both Part 1 and Part 2 of the procurement.
  • Mandatory submission documents for bidder selection must be provided.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must demonstrate capability to develop evaluations, legal handbooks, and a quality standard.
  • Technical proposals must be submitted, adhering to specified requirements for both Part 1 and Part 2.
  • Proposals must address the development of a digital manual for legal issues.
  • Proposals must address the creation of a quality standard for state-provided legal aid services.
  • Technical proposals will be evaluated based on defined criteria.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Financial offers must be submitted according to the specified requirements for both Part 1 and Part 2.
  • The project is funded by the EU cohesion policy.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Offers must be submitted electronically.
  • The submission deadline is 2026-02-02T11:00:00.
  • Mandatory submission documents include those for bidder selection, technical proposals, and financial offers.
  • Bidders must follow detailed instructions for electronic offer submission.
  • Bidders must adhere to communication procedures and bid submission guidelines.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 2.versija
otherIepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 2...103.8 KB
Summary:
This document details the specific requirements for Part 1 of a procurement process, outlining mandatory submission documents for bidder selection, technical proposals, and financial offers, along with evaluation criteria.
PDF
Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 2.versija
otherIepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 2...102.9 KB
Summary:
This document contains the detailed requirements for Part 2 of a procurement, outlining exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and the evaluation criteria for bids related to the development of a quality standard for state-provided legal aid services.
ZIP
Līgumprojekts
contract_draftLīgumprojekts.zip54.2 KB
Summary:
This document contains a draft contract outlining the terms for the Court Administration to procure services for evaluating legal issues, developing a digital manual, and creating a quality standard for state-provided legal aid.
ZIP
Nolikums ar grozījumiem
tender_noticeNolikums ar grozījumiem.zip77.0 KB
Summary:
This document contains the regulations, including amendments, for a procurement titled 'Development of evaluations, legal nature question handbooks, and a quality standard,' outlining general information, funding, bidder requirements, and detailed instructions for electronic offer submission.
PDF
Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija
technical_specIepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1...103.7 KB
Summary:
This document contains detailed requirements for bidders for Part 1 of a procurement concerning the development of an assessment, legal issues handbook, and quality standard, covering exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.
PDF
Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija
technical_specIepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1...102.8 KB
Summary:
This document contains detailed requirements for the second part of a procurement, outlining exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for bidders.
ZIP
Nolikums
tender_noticeNolikums.zip67.8 KB
Summary:
This document contains the official procurement regulations ('Nolikums') for a tender by the Latvian Court Administration, detailing the requirements for the 'Development of evaluations, legal handbooks, and quality standards,' funded by the EU cohesion policy, and outlining general information, bidder eligibility, communication procedures, and bid submission guidelines.
HTM
Main tender page
tender_noticeindex.html
Summary:
This document contains the basic data for an announced open competition (TA 2025/13/K) by Tiesu administrācija for the development of evaluation, legal handbooks, and quality standards, detailing procurement status, deadlines, and submission requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a well-structured open procedure with detailed technical requirements and EU funding. However, significant concerns regarding restricted document access and undisclosed estimated value severely impact fairness and overall transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The tender outlines an open procedure, specifies CPV codes, and indicates EU/WTO compliance, with reasonable submission deadlines. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag, if accurate, represents a significant breach of transparency and equal treatment principles. The estimated value is also not disclosed, which is a minor compliance issue.

•Restricted document access (if accurate)
•Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive, covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Performance conditions are clearly linked to technical specifications and the draft contract. Evaluation criteria are mentioned in the detailed document summaries, despite a conflicting automated flag.

Completeness70/100

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, and description, is provided. Detailed requirements and criteria are defined across multiple documents. However, the estimated contract value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant gaps for bidders.

•Estimated value not disclosed
•Missing contract duration
Fairness40/100

The open procedure, E-Procurement, and division into parts are positive for fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a critical concern, directly undermining equal access and transparency. The undisclosed estimated value further hinders bidders' ability to assess the opportunity fairly.

•Restricted document access
•Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality55/100

Electronic submission is supported, and financing information (EU funded) is available. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag severely impedes practical participation. The absence of a clear contract start date and duration also makes it difficult for potential bidders to plan effectively.

•Restricted document access
•Missing contract duration
Data Consistency60/100

Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, there are notable inconsistencies: 'Restricted document access' conflicts with the presence of detailed document summaries, and 'No evaluation criteria specified' contradicts mentions of criteria in AI-extracted requirements and document summaries. The 'No e-submission' flag also contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic.

•Contradiction regarding document access
•Contradiction regarding evaluation criteria
Sustainability50/100

The project is EU funded, which often implies higher standards. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or a specific focus on innovation as part of the evaluation or performance conditions.

•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Open procedure with clear type and detailed regulations
Comprehensive technical specifications and performance conditions
EU funding and E-Procurement support
Clear project description and well-defined requirements
No disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Restricted document access, hindering fair competition
Estimated value not disclosed, limiting bidder assessment
Missing contract duration and start date
Inconsistencies in automated checks regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents immediately.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify contract duration and start date for better planning by bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
63/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes