Tenders

Merton Adult Learning Main Delivery Service

Open
Deadline
152 days left
August 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
005889-2026
Value
£3,900,000
Location
Outer London - South, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 02, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£3,900,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Outer London - South
Type
Other
61
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council provides adult education services for residents within the Borough. This contract is for the delivery of the Main Adult Learning Main Service Contract on behalf of the council in Merton, prioritising the skills and wellbeing needs of for the residents of Merton.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit bids by 24 February 2026.
--The bid must be structured to address the award criteria: Quality (50%), Price (45%), and Social Value (5%).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--(No specific requirements found in the provided text.)
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--(No specific requirements found in the provided text.)
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidder must be capable of delivering adult education services.
--Services provided must prioritize the skills and wellbeing needs of Merton residents.
--Services must be delivered within the Borough of Merton.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include a clear pricing proposal for the adult learning services.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
005889-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS data record provides structured information about the London Borough of Merton's tender for adult education services, detailing the buyer and the planning phase of the procurement.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
005889-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the London Borough of Merton's tender for the Main Adult Learning Service Contract, focusing on residents' skills and wellbeing needs.

Official PDF VersionPDF
005889-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the London Borough of Merton's £3.9M adult education services contract, detailing the 3-year term, 24 February 2026 submission deadline, and award criteria weighted 50% Quality, 45% Price, and 5% Social Value.

Tender NoticeHTM
005889-2026.html

This tender notice from the London Borough of Merton invites bids for the delivery of adult learning services, valued at an estimated £3.9 million over three years, with submissions due by 24 February 2026 and evaluated on quality, price, and social value.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for adult learning services exhibits significant data inconsistencies and practical flaws, particularly regarding deadlines and contract start, alongside a lack of detailed requirements. While basic information and award criteria are clear, the overall quality is hampered by these critical issues.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes clearly. Deadlines are reasonable from today's date. However, the AI-extracted requirements lack explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility criteria, which are fundamental legal requirements, suggesting potential incompleteness in the provided summary of legal aspects.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds in AI summary.
Clarity70/100

The overall description of the service and the award criteria (Quality, Price, Social Value) are clear. However, the AI-extracted technical, eligibility, and exclusion requirements are either very high-level or missing, which reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on specific expectations.

High-level or missing detailed technical, eligibility, and exclusion requirements.
Completeness65/100

Basic information, estimated value, and duration are present. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria. Furthermore, while documents are listed, their summaries suggest they are administrative/OCDS data, and a detailed 'tender specification' document with comprehensive requirements appears to be missing from the provided content.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria.
Apparent lack of a detailed tender specification document.
Fairness65/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. Award criteria are transparent and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is positive. However, the automated check indicates no e-submission, which significantly hinders equal access. The potential incompleteness of accessible documentation also impacts fairness.

No e-submission.
Potential incompleteness of detailed tender documentation.
Practicality45/100

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback. Critically, the contract start date is listed as the same day as the submission deadline, which is entirely impractical and illogical for any procurement process involving evaluation, award, and standstill periods.

No e-submission.
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline).
Data Consistency35/100

There are severe inconsistencies in key dates: two different submission deadlines are provided (2026-08-02 vs. 24 February 2026). The contract start date is illogically set to the same day as one of the submission deadlines. Additionally, the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

Conflicting submission deadlines.
Illogical contract start date.
Sustainability55/100

The tender explicitly includes social value aspects (5% weighting and requirement to address social value), which is a positive contribution to sustainability. However, there is no mention of green procurement or innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability ambition.

No explicit green procurement or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear definition of service and purpose.
Transparent award criteria (Quality, Price, Social Value).
Estimated value and duration are disclosed.
Includes social value aspects.
Procedure type and CPV codes are correctly assigned.

Concerns

Severe data inconsistencies regarding submission deadlines and contract start date.
Lack of explicit detailed technical specifications, eligibility, and exclusion criteria in the provided summaries.
No electronic submission option.
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline).
Apparent lack of a comprehensive tender specification document.

Recommendations

1. Rectify all data inconsistencies, especially conflicting deadlines and the illogical contract start date, and issue a clarification.
2. Provide a comprehensive tender specification document with detailed technical, eligibility, and exclusion criteria.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance fairness and practicality for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline