Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation works for the replacement premises of Narva Vanalinn Primary School

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307974
Value
€87,900
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€87,900
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation works for the replacement premises of Narva Vanalinn Primary School. The works include interior finishing and electrical works.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bidders must submit the bid in accordance with the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must provide instructions for separating trade secrets.
--Bidders must complete declarations according to Form 2 and Form 3.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have grounds for exclusion as per RHS § 95.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must have had a net turnover of at least EUR 150,000 in each financial year for the last two completed financial years.
--Bidders must have a properly fulfilled similar contract within the last 60 months.
--Bidders must provide data on their net turnover for the last three financial years (Vorm 1).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The technical description defines the scope of renovation works, including installation of flooring, radiators, and lighting, as well as interior finishing works (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Net turnover of at least EUR 150,000 in each financial year for the last two completed financial years.
--Bidders must fill in Vorm 3, which contains a table of bid costs for various renovation works.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307974_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.5 KB

Bidders must submit their offer by adhering to the contracting authority's conditions, providing instructions for business secret segregation, and completing forms 2 and 3, ensuring the project manager meets qualification requirements.

Vorm 1DOC
Vorm 1.docx -- 26.3 KB

The bidder must provide data on their net turnover for the last three financial years and submit a list of reference contracts with client contact details to prove fulfillment of qualification requirements.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 17.8 KB

Form 2 is a declaration of participation in the public procurement, by which the bidder confirms acceptance of the tender conditions and compliance of the bid.

Vorm 3XLS
Vorm 3.xlsx -- 14.1 KB

The bidder must complete Form 3, which includes a tender cost table for various renovation works at the Narva Vanalinna Primary School's replacement premises.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4.docx -- 17.1 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of a project manager's CV to assess their suitability for managing the renovation works of Narva Vanalinna Põhikool's replacement premises.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8.docx -- 13.7 KB

Form 8 is a joint bid authorization, empowering one bidder to represent other participants in a joint bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307974_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, and other bids are calculated accordingly.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307974_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.7 KB

Bidders must confirm they have no exclusion grounds under RHS § 95, have had a net turnover of at least EUR 150,000 in each of the last two financial years, and have successfully completed at least one similar contract within the last 60 months.

Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 44.0 KB

This document contains a proposal for submitting a bid for the renovation works of Narva Vanalinna Põhikool's replacement premises, outlining submission format, deadlines, and technical conditions.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 145.4 KB

This technical specification defines the scope of renovation works for the Narva Vanalinna Põhikool's replacement premises, including flooring, radiator and lighting installation, and interior finishing works.

Lisa 2 Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 90.5 KB

This document contains the draft construction works contract, defining general and special contract terms, including contractor and client details, deadlines, guarantees, and penalty clauses.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works at Narva Vanalinna Põhikool is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is defined as LM (Negotiation Procedure), which is a valid procurement type.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, and requirements are documented through various forms and technical specifications. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and primarily price-based, which is understandable for this type of work.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Contract Duration' is stated as 3 months, but the 'Tender Valid' period is also 3 months, which might lead to confusion if contract finalization extends beyond the tender validity. The financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Potential ambiguity between contract duration and tender validity period.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (primarily price-based). E-procurement is utilized. The requirements, such as net turnover and similar contract fulfillment, are standard and not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. A mandatory site visit is required, which adds a practical step. The contract start date is stated as 'preliminary and has no legal significance,' which is acceptable but could be more precise. Financing information is not detailed.

Lack of explicit financing details.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. The status '11' typically indicates an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but there are no specific criteria or requirements detailed within the provided information regarding social aspects, innovation, or explicit EU funding confirmation.

Lack of specific details on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear description of works and requirements.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criteria (primarily price).
Standard and fair eligibility and technical requirements.

Concerns

Ambiguity between contract duration and tender validity.
Limited detail on sustainability aspects despite mention of 'Green Procurement'.
Lack of explicit financing information.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the relationship between contract duration and tender validity period.
2. Provide more specific details on how 'Green Procurement' will be applied or evaluated.
3. Include information on the source of financing for the project.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline