Skip to main content
Tenders

Summer maintenance of Põltsamaa rural municipality roads 2026

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307882
Value
€71,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of works according to the cost table data100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€71,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Profiling of gravel roads in the municipality, delivery of covering material to gravel roads, repair of potholes on asphalt roads, surface dressing, ditch excavation, and brush cutting.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents. Conditional bids are not allowed.
--The Hankepass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties. It contains the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents. Conditional bids are not allowed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties. It contains the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender involves summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality roads in 2026, including grading of gravel roads and adding surfacing material, with technical requirements and volumes specified.
--The scope of grading works is detailed in a table including road numbers, names, and section lengths.
--The contract project outlines the contractor's obligations for maintaining gravel roads, repairing potholes, digging ditches, and mowing brush.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated cost of the procurement exceeds the public procurement threshold.
--The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307882_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents; conditional bids are not permitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307882_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307882_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.1 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses.

Lisa 1. Suvehoolde tehniline kirjeldus 2026DOC
Lisa 1 -Suvehoolde tehniline kirjeldus 2026.d... -- 21.0 KB

This document details the summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality's roads in 2026, including gravel road grading and material addition, specifying technical requirements and volumes for the works.

Lisa 2. Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 2026XLS
Lisa 2 - Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 202... -- 23.9 KB

This document presents a table of grading work volumes for the Põltsamaa municipality's summer road maintenance 2026 tender, detailing road numbers, names, and section lengths.

Lisa 3. Lepingu projekt - Suvehoole 2026DOC
Lisa 3 - Lepingu projekt - Suvehoole 2026.doc... -- 22.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality roads, outlining the contractor's obligations for gravel road maintenance, pothole repair, ditch digging, and brush cutting.

Lisa 4. Töömahtude ja maksumuste tabelXLS
Lisa 4 - Töömahtude ja maksumuste tabel.xlsx -- 11.3 KB

This document presents a detailed table of work volumes and costs that bidders must evaluate and fill out for the Põltsamaa municipality's summer road maintenance works in 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for summer road maintenance in Põltsamaa municipality is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on self-declaration for eligibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The estimated value exceeding the national threshold is justified.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is detailed, and technical specifications are provided in separate documents. The evaluation criteria are clearly stated as the lowest price. The Hankepass format is specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while documents are attached, the specific content of some (like the ESPD XML) is not fully analyzable by AI.

Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting fairness. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The use of Hankepass as preliminary evidence is a common practice, but full document access is assumed through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract duration is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The contract start date is not provided, which could impact planning.

Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of green procurement criteria
Absence of social considerations

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope of work
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Well-defined CPV code and location

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Contract start date not specified
Reliance on self-declaration (Hankepass) for eligibility

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or social criteria into the evaluation.
2. Specify the contract start date for better bidder planning.
3. Provide more detail on the expected format or interpretation of the ESPD XML document if it's critical.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline