Tarvitsetko tarjousasiantuntijan apua? Katso tarjousten valmistelupalvelumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Summer Maintenance of Põltsamaa Municipality Roads 2026

Suljettu

Jättömääräaika on umpeutunut

Tämän tarjouskilpailun jättömääräaika on umpeutunut, eikä se enää ota vastaan hakemuksia. Alla olevat tiedot säilytetään viitteellisinä.

Selaa aktiivisia tarjouskilpailuja
Määräaika
Päättynyt
6. huhtikuuta 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
307882
Arvo
€71,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
19. maaliskuuta 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total cost of works according to the cost table data100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

19. maaliskuuta 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

30. maaliskuuta 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

6. huhtikuuta 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

6. huhtikuuta 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€71,000
Kesto
9 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€265,238
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.7
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
90%
843 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Profiling of gravel roads, delivery of covering material to gravel roads, repair of potholes on asphalt roads, chip sealing, ditch excavation, and brush cutting.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender is a price-driven procurement for essential road maintenance services. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible price while demonstrating robust technical capability and meticulous adherence to all submission requirements. Efficiency and cost control are paramount.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Unbeatable Price for Essential Road Maintenance

Reliable and Efficient Execution of Summer Road Works

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Price-driven evaluation offers a direct path to winning if the lowest bid is submitted.
The scope of work is clearly defined, allowing for precise cost estimation and operational planning.
The absence of social value or innovative aspects simplifies the bid preparation, allowing focus on core requirements.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures in operations and material sourcing, and aim for the absolute lowest viable price. Explore economies of scale if bidding for multiple similar contracts.

Risk of disqualification due to non-compliance with mandatory requirements or submission errors.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all bid components, especially the Hankepass and cost table. Ensure all mandatory confirmations are provided and that the bid is 100% compliant. Double-check submission deadlines and formats.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A local or regional contractor with proven experience in gravel and asphalt road maintenance, possessing the necessary equipment and skilled workforce to execute the specified tasks efficiently. They should have a strong understanding of cost management and a streamlined operational model to offer a highly competitive price.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Confirmation of bid compliance with all tender conditions; no conditional bids.
Accurate and complete completion of the Hankepass (ESPD).
Detailed and accurate cost table submission, reflecting all specified work volumes.
Demonstrated technical capability to perform grading, material hauling, pothole repair, ditch digging, and brush mowing.
Submission by the deadline: 2026-04-06 07:00:00.
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
The lowest price submitted.
Demonstrated operational efficiency leading to a highly competitive price.
Flawless bid submission, indicating attention to detail and reliability.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not a mandatory requirement, consider subtly highlighting any existing local employment practices or sustainable material sourcing if it can be done without increasing costs, as a minor differentiator if competitors are purely price-focused.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total cost of works100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing operational efficiency, minimizing overheads, and securing competitive material costs. Ensure all volumes in the cost table are accurately reflected and that no additional costs are inadvertently included.

Suositukset5
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% cost evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price that is still profitable. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown for each line item in the work volume table, identifying all potential efficiencies and cost-saving opportunities. This may involve optimizing equipment usage, efficient material sourcing, and streamlined logistics.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Ensure 100% Hankepass Compliance
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

The Hankepass (ESPD) is a critical component. Ensure it is completed accurately, comprehensively, and without any conditional statements. Any omissions or errors can lead to disqualification. Treat it as a self-declaration of capability and compliance.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Meticulous Cost Table Completion
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

The 'Lisa 2. Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 2026' must be filled out with extreme precision. Any discrepancies between the stated volumes and the contractor's proposed costs can raise red flags or lead to miscalculations in the evaluation. Ensure all specified roads and lengths are accounted for.

Ensures accurate evaluation and prevents potential disputes or disqualification based on cost misrepresentation.
Implement a Bid Review Checklist
KorkeaMatala vaiva

Develop and use a comprehensive checklist for bid submission. This checklist should cover all mandatory requirements, eligibility criteria, Hankepass completeness, cost table accuracy, and submission deadline adherence. A final review by a senior team member not involved in the bid preparation is recommended.

Minimizes the risk of human error and disqualification due to overlooked requirements.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly communicate operational efficiency in the Hankepass or any accompanying documentation. This can be framed as the reason for the competitive pricing. For example, mentioning modern equipment or streamlined processes that allow for cost-effective service delivery.

Subtly reinforces the value proposition of a low price, making it seem more sustainable and less risky.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution for essential road maintenance, emphasizing efficiency and reliability. If competitors are likely to bid very low, focus on demonstrating that your low price is achievable through genuine operational advantages rather than unsustainable practices.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

11 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (3)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (4)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents. Conditional bids are not allowed.
--The Hankepass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties. It contains the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 07:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents. Conditional bids are not allowed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The Hankepass is the bidder's own confirmation, serving as preliminary evidence in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties. It contains the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender involves summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality roads in 2026, including grading of gravel roads and adding surfacing material, with technical requirements and volumes specified.
--The scope of grading works is detailed in a table including road numbers, names, and section lengths.
--The contract project outlines the contractor's obligations for maintaining gravel roads, repairing potholes, digging ditches, and mowing brush.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated cost of the procurement exceeds the public procurement threshold.
--The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
307882_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 2.6 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents; conditional bids are not permitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307882_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307882_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.1 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses.

Lisa 1. Suvehoolde tehniline kirjeldus 2026DOC
Lisa 1 -Suvehoolde tehniline kirjeldus 2026.d... -- 21.0 KB

This document details the summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality's roads in 2026, including gravel road grading and material addition, specifying technical requirements and volumes for the works.

Lisa 2. Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 2026XLS
Lisa 2 - Töömahtude tabel - greiderdamine 202... -- 23.9 KB

This document presents a table of grading work volumes for the Põltsamaa municipality's summer road maintenance 2026 tender, detailing road numbers, names, and section lengths.

Lisa 3. Lepingu projekt - Suvehoole 2026DOC
Lisa 3 - Lepingu projekt - Suvehoole 2026.doc... -- 22.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the summer maintenance of Põltsamaa municipality roads, outlining the contractor's obligations for gravel road maintenance, pothole repair, ditch digging, and brush cutting.

Lisa 4. Töömahtude ja maksumuste tabelXLS
Lisa 4 - Töömahtude ja maksumuste tabel.xlsx -- 11.3 KB

This document presents a detailed table of work volumes and costs that bidders must evaluate and fill out for the Põltsamaa municipality's summer road maintenance works in 2026.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for summer road maintenance in Põltsamaa municipality is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on self-declaration for eligibility.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The estimated value exceeding the national threshold is justified.

Selkeys80/100

The description of works is detailed, and technical specifications are provided in separate documents. The evaluation criteria are clearly stated as the lowest price. The Hankepass format is specified.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while documents are attached, the specific content of some (like the ESPD XML) is not fully analyzable by AI.

Reiluus85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting fairness. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The use of Hankepass as preliminary evidence is a common practice, but full document access is assumed through the e-procurement platform.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract duration is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The contract start date is not provided, which could impact planning.

•Contract start date not specified
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

•Lack of green procurement criteria
•Absence of social considerations

Vahvuudet

Clear technical specifications and scope of work
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Well-defined CPV code and location

Huolenaiheet

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Contract start date not specified
Reliance on self-declaration (Hankepass) for eligibility

Suositukset

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or social criteria into the evaluation.
2. Specify the contract start date for better bidder planning.
3. Provide more detail on the expected format or interpretation of the ESPD XML document if it's critical.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa