Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login13 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
The contracting authority will vet subcontractors for criminal offenses and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
This document outlines conditions where the bidder must confirm adherence to requirements stated in the tender documents, including joint bids and equivalency.
The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.
The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the contractor, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.
This terms of reference outlines the technical requirements for the conservation of the southwestern section of Karksi Castle's wall, including cleaning, repointing, and stabilization, and requires bidders to comply with the Cultural Heritage Act.
This action plan outlines the methodology for the conservation of Karksi order castle wall sections, including historical background and descriptions of previous works.
The tender document outlines the scope and details of the conservation work for the southwestern section of the Karksi Castle walls, including preparatory work, cleaning, material costs, and conservation activities.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for the conservation of the Karksi Castle wall section is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on a manual submission process for some documents.
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible.
The description of the conservation work is detailed, and technical requirements are outlined in the 'Lähteülesanne' and 'Karksi ordulinnuse makumuse esildis' documents. The evaluation criteria are clearly stated as price-based.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of a direct URL for all tender documents and the reliance on manual submission for some files (e.g., .png, .xml) could be improved.
The tender is fair, with full document access and disclosed value. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The use of e-procurement is noted, but the submission process for certain documents might not be fully electronic.
While electronic submission is mentioned, the presence of non-analyzable file formats (.png, .xml) suggests that not all aspects of the submission might be fully electronic. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits the potential for integrated sustainability measures.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required