Reconstruction of Reldori Wastewater Pumping Station in Pärnu
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €40,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45232423-3 — Sewage pumping stations construction work
- Procedure
- Simplified procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.
This tender is a price-driven opportunity with a clear focus on the lowest bid. Success hinges on meticulous cost control, efficient execution, and demonstrating a flawless track record in similar projects. While social value and innovation are absent, a strong emphasis on technical compliance and risk mitigation will be crucial.
The most cost-effective and technically compliant solution for the Reldori wastewater pumping station reconstruction.
Proven expertise in delivering similar projects efficiently and without disruption.
Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost savings, and ensure efficient project planning to offer the lowest viable price without compromising quality or profitability.
Carefully assess the contracting authority's likely budget based on the estimated value and market rates. Ensure the bid is realistic and justifiable, and be prepared to explain cost components during negotiation.
Focus on achieving the absolute lowest price to maximize score and minimize the likelihood of ties. If a tie is unavoidable, ensure all documentation is impeccable to avoid any grounds for disqualification.
Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing material sourcing, labor efficiency, and minimizing overheads. Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all areas for potential savings. Ensure the bid is competitive but sustainable.
Thoroughly review and complete Vorm KI.doc, ensuring all declarations are accurate and verifiable. Any omission or inaccuracy can lead to immediate disqualification.
Provide a detailed and well-documented list of at least one, preferably multiple, similar construction works completed within the last 60 months. Highlight projects involving wastewater pumping stations or similar compact infrastructure.
Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis to determine the lowest possible price that ensures profitability. Explore all avenues for cost reduction in materials, labor, and logistics. This is the sole evaluation criterion.
Ensure the proposed compact pumping station unequivocally meets all technical specifications outlined in 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. Provide clear evidence and documentation to support this compliance.
Anticipate potential areas for negotiation, particularly regarding cost. Have clear justifications for pricing and be prepared to explain how cost savings are achieved while maintaining quality.
Research or infer the contracting authority's likely budget range based on the estimated value and similar projects. Ensure the bid is realistic and justifiable to avoid rejection.
If possible, emphasize the bidder's ability to execute the reconstruction efficiently and with minimal disruption, even if not explicitly a scoring criterion. This can be a qualitative advantage during negotiation.
Competitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
17 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must submit their tender according to the provided conditions, including clarifying trade secrets, presenting the tender cost, and proving the compliance of the installed compact pumping station with the technical description.
The bidder must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds, which is necessary for participation in the procurement procedure.
Submit a list of similar construction works performed in the last 60 months according to Form KII to prove your qualifications.
The Bid Notice (Form PI) is a mandatory form that must be submitted with the bid for the reconstruction of the Pärnu wastewater pumping station tender.
The tender evaluation criteria state that the total bid amount (excluding VAT) is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
The contracting authority screens bidders based on exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, including criminal records, tax debt, and past contract breaches.
No summary available for this document.
This document is the general part of a construction works contract, defining the parties to the contract and their contact details for the reconstruction project of the Pärnu Vesi wastewater pumping station.
A joint bidder authorization is required when multiple companies submit a bid together, defining their representative and powers.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for wastewater pumping station reconstruction in Pärnu is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external documents for full understanding.
Score Breakdown
The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. The use of an inverted procedure is specified, which is a legal mechanism.
The description of the works is concise and understandable. Key requirements are documented through attached forms and summaries. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is clearly stated. Conditions for participation and submission are outlined.
Most basic information is present, including value, duration type, and location. However, the financing condition refers to external contract terms, and the full technical specification is not directly accessible for AI analysis, potentially impacting completeness for bidders relying solely on this summary.
The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). While negotiation is allowed, it's within the context of tender documents and cost, which is standard. The possibility of drawing lots for equal scores is a fair, albeit unusual, tie-breaker.
E-submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the tender validity period. Financing details are linked to external contract terms. The duration type is specified as 'DAYS', but the exact number of days is not provided in the basic information.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The status '11' is consistent with an active tender.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required