Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307114
Value
€180,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€180,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is the reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality, in accordance with the construction project and the scope defined in the tender documents. The works include the reconstruction of the existing roadway, the construction of a sidewalk, and a stormwater drainage system and related facilities.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically via eRHR.
--Bids must be submitted in accordance with the conditions of the tender documents.
--Bidders must confirm qualifications and exclusion grounds using the Hankepass, which is completed electronically.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders will be excluded if they are involved in fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking, as verified by the contracting authority.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their qualifications and exclusion grounds using the Hankepass (preliminary confirmation).
--Bidders must submit the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) electronically.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must comply with the technical specifications outlined in "Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf".
--Bidders must adhere to the terms and requirements of the construction contract project outlined in "Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx".
--Bidders must complete the "Vorm 1- Mahutabel (kululoend).xlsx" which details cost accounting and work volumes.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The sole evaluation criterion is the cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307114_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307114_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

Tender documents include compliance conditions covering joint bidder power of attorney, trade secrets, subcontractor engagement rules, and bid submission requirements.

Vorm 1- MahutabelXLS
Vorm 1- Mahutabel (kululoend).xlsx -- 19.9 KB

This document is a quantity table detailing cost breakdown and work volumes for the Kesakanni tee L1 reconstruction project, which must be completed for tender submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307114_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology, where the bid price is the sole criterion and the lowest bid receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307114_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of qualification and exclusion criteria set by the contracting authority, to be filled electronically.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 30.9 KB

Luunja Municipality is conducting an open tender for the reconstruction of Kesakanni road in Veibri village, with bids to be submitted electronically via eRHR in accordance with the tender document conditions.

Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 159.2 KB

This technical specification defines the scope of reconstruction works for Kesakanni road, requirements for materials, quality, and execution of works in Luunja municipality.

Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 50.6 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms and requirements for the reconstruction of Kesakanni road.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a single price-based evaluation criterion.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure type 'E' (Open Procedure) and status '11' (Open) are standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the reconstruction works is clear, detailing the scope of road, sidewalk, and drainage system improvements. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are referenced, providing a good understanding of requirements. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' without further detail could be more transparent. While essential documents are mentioned, the actual attachment of all documents for full review is not explicitly confirmed.

Value Classified: Yes without further detail.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price), and all documents are accessible. The exclusion grounds are standard and applied universally, not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission via eRHR is a practical approach. The contract start date is specified. However, information regarding financing sources is not explicitly provided, which could be a practical consideration for bidders.

Financing information not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical and scope description.
Mandatory use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Well-defined exclusion and eligibility requirements.
Logical and consistent timeline.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Reliance solely on price as the evaluation criterion.
Limited detail on 'Value Classified: Yes'.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
2. Consider adding qualitative aspects to the evaluation beyond just the lowest price to ensure best value.
3. Provide more transparency regarding the 'Value Classified' status.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline