Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of bus stops and service infrastructure at Mäo traffic junction on state road No. 2 (E263) Tallinn-Tartu-Võru-Luhamaa road km 82.2-82.8

Closed

Updated October 15, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307059
Value
€1,800,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the cost list for the construction of bus stops and service infrastructure at the Mäo interchange on State Road No. 2 (E263) Tallinn-Tartu-Võru-Luhamaa Road km 82.2-82.8100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€1,800,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45233120-6 — Road construction works
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€1,800,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of bus stops and service infrastructure at Mäo traffic junction on state road No. 2 (E263) Tallinn-Tartu-Võru-Luhamaa road km 82.2-82.8 in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Mäo intersection bus stops prioritizes price as the sole evaluation criterion. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive pricing while meticulously adhering to all mandatory requirements and leveraging the self-declaration procurement pass to demonstrate compliance efficiently. Differentiation will come from demonstrating robust subcontractor management and a clear understanding of the project's scope.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for Mäo intersection bus stop infrastructure.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the self-declaration procurement pass (ESPD) for efficient compliance demonstration.
Aggressive pricing strategy due to price being the sole evaluation criterion.
Demonstrating proactive subcontractor vetting to meet mandatory exclusion grounds.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or compliance. Consider pre-negotiated rates with key suppliers and subcontractors.

Ensuring all mandatory exclusion grounds for subcontractors are meticulously addressed.

Develop a robust subcontractor vetting process that includes thorough background checks, requiring clear explanations and evidence of reliability from all proposed subcontractors. Maintain detailed records of this vetting process.

Potential for unstated technical requirements in the full tender documents.

Thoroughly review all provided tender documents (HD II, HD III) for any technical specifications, drawings, or site conditions that may impact cost or execution. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if any ambiguities exist.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in road infrastructure and public transport facilities, possessing strong cost control capabilities and a well-established network of reliable subcontractors. They must be adept at navigating self-declaration procurement processes and capable of delivering within a tight 6-month timeframe.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of agreement with tender conditions
Completed cost list in Excel format
Marking and justification of trade secrets
Subcontractor background checks for criminal offenses and fraud
Procurement Pass (ESPD) as self-declaration
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably rigorous and documented subcontractor vetting process that exceeds minimum requirements.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown within the Excel sheet, highlighting efficiencies.
A clear and concise confirmation of agreement with all tender conditions, leaving no room for ambiguity.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities for individuals facing barriers to employment within the project execution phase. This can be framed as a proactive contribution to community development, even if not a mandatory requirement.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid Price100%

Submit the lowest possible price that is still profitable and sustainable, ensuring all costs are accurately accounted for. Leverage economies of scale and efficient project management to achieve this.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Cost List Preparation
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly detailed and accurate cost list in Excel. Ensure all line items are clearly defined, justified, and reflect the lowest achievable costs. Double-check for any potential errors or omissions that could lead to a higher bid price.

Directly impacts the sole evaluation criterion, maximizing the score for price.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given that price is the sole evaluation criterion, aim to submit the most competitive price possible. This requires thorough cost analysis, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract.

Crucial for winning the tender.
Robust Subcontractor Vetting Protocol
CriticalMed effort

Implement a comprehensive vetting process for all subcontractors to proactively address mandatory exclusion grounds. This includes obtaining necessary documentation and clear explanations of reliability. Maintain a detailed audit trail of this process.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Thorough Tender Document Review and Confirmation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure absolute confirmation of agreement with all tender conditions. Conduct a detailed review of all provided documents (HD II, HD III) to identify any potential ambiguities or unstated requirements that could impact pricing or execution. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if necessary.

Ensures compliance and avoids potential disputes or disqualification.
Proactive Trade Secret Justification
MediumLow effort

If any proprietary information or methods are to be included, ensure they are clearly marked and thoroughly justified as trade secrets. This demonstrates a professional approach to intellectual property.

Maintains confidentiality and demonstrates due diligence.
Voluntary Local Employment Commitment
LowLow effort

Include a statement about prioritizing local labor or offering training opportunities during project execution, even if not explicitly required. Frame this as a commitment to community benefit.

May offer a slight positive perception, though not a formal evaluation factor.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most straightforward, compliant, and cost-effective solution. Emphasize the efficiency of the self-declaration process and the robustness of the subcontractor vetting to instill confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver without issues.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must confirm agreement with the tender conditions.
--The bidder must submit a completed cost list in Excel.
--The bidder must mark and justify trade secrets, if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority checks subcontractors' backgrounds for criminal offenses and fraud, requiring relevant explanations and evidence of reliability.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must confirm agreement with the tender conditions.
--The bidder must submit a completed cost list in Excel.
--The bidder must mark and justify trade secrets, if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307059_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 30.0 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal offenses and fraud, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307059_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

The bidder must confirm acceptance of tender conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and identify and justify any business secrets, if applicable.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 27.8 KB

The tender document presents a cost breakdown for the construction of bus stops and service infrastructure at the Mäo interchange, including various work and design costs.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307059_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307059_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.8 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

HD III Tehniline kirjeldus ja selle lisadZIP
HD III Tehniline kirjeldus koos lisadega.zip -- 695.9 KB

No summary available for this document.

HD II Lepingu projekt ja selle lisadZIP
HD II Lepingu projekt koos lisadega.zip -- 909.9 KB

No summary available for this document.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.1 KB

The base document for the public procurement contains the contracting authority's details, general tender procedure terms, bidder exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements, all published on the e-procurement environment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of bus stops and service infrastructure at the Mäo interchange is generally well-structured, with clear evaluation criteria and a straightforward submission process. However, it lacks specific details on technical and financial capabilities, and its sustainability aspects are limited.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure type 'E' and procedure code 'A' are standard. The presence of a liable person and organization details further supports compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the evaluation criteria (bid price) are explicitly stated. The requirements for bidder confirmation and cost list submission are also well-defined. The reference to the base document for further details is helpful.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, specific technical and financial capability requirements are not detailed in the provided text, which impacts completeness. The number of attached documents (9) is good, but the AI could not analyze all of them.

•Technical capability requirements not specified.
•Financial requirements not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access indicated through the e-procurement platform. The value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criterion (bid price) is objective. The use of e-procurement and the ESPD system promotes fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding contract start date and financing details is not explicitly provided in the extracted text, reducing practicality.

•Contract start date not specified.
•Financing information not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Tender Valid) are logically consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive indicator. However, no specific social aspects or innovation focus are detailed in the provided text. It is not explicitly stated if the tender is EU funded.

•No specific social criteria mentioned.
•No specific innovation focus mentioned.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria (bid price).
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided.

Concerns

Missing specific technical and financial capability requirements.
Lack of detailed information on contract start date and financing.
Limited explicit details on social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Recommendations

1. Include detailed technical and financial capability requirements in the tender documents.
2. Specify the contract start date and provide information on financing.
3. Elaborate on the specific green, social, and innovation aspects to be considered.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes