Skip to main content
Tenders

Sinimäe family houses renovation works

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306958
Value
€47,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 03, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€47,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
78
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to find a contractor for the renovation works of the family houses of Sinimäe home (Lastekodu 2).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The contract duration is up to seven months from signing, including the fulfillment of all main obligations (e.g., signing of the acceptance-transfer act and full payment by the buyer).
--The deadline for completing the renovation works is six months from the signing of the contract.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must prove the proper fulfillment of at least one similar construction contract within the last 60 months.
--The bidder must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation in the fulfillment of the procurement contract.
--If submitting as a joint bidder, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the need for similar construction contract experience.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

15 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306958_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

The bidder must confirm that subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will not be involved in contract execution, and must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders and describe trade secrets if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306958_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

In the tender "Sinimäe peremajade remonttööd", bids are primarily evaluated based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306958_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 3.7 KB

Bidders must demonstrate the proper completion of at least one similar construction contract within the last 60 months.

AP-01 ESIMESE KORRUSE PLAANPDF
AP-01 ESIMESE KORRUSE PLAAN.pdf -- 644.1 KB

This document provides the first-floor plan with construction materials and room specifications, necessary for preparing a bid for the Sinimäe residential building renovation works.

ELAPRO_0-Floor-System-2024-enPDF
ELAPRO_0-Floor-System-2024-en.pdf -- 3.5 MB

The ELAPRO floor system is a fast, easy, and environmentally friendly solution for various surfaces, offering technical and ecological advantages.

Lisa 2 Lepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt Sinimäe.doc -- 69.5 KB

The tender document contains the draft contract, outlining the contractual terms and legal framework for the renovation works of the Sinimäe family houses.

Maja 1PDF
Maja_1_Maht.pdf -- 384.1 KB

This document provides information regarding renovation works for House 1, as part of the Sinimäe residential houses renovation project.

Maja 2PDF
Maja_2_Maht.pdf -- 386.6 KB

This document contains information regarding renovation works for House 2, as part of the Sinimäe family houses renovation project.

Maja 3PDF
Maja_3_Maht.pdf -- 388.9 KB

This document provides information regarding House 3, which is part of the Sinimäe residential house renovation tender.

Maja 4PDF
Maja_4_Maht.pdf -- 391.9 KB

This document "Maja 4" contains essential information for the Sinimäe residential building renovation tender, necessary for bid preparation.

Maja 5PDF
Maja_5_Maht.pdf -- 393.4 KB

This document contains information about House 5, which is part of the Sinimäe residential house renovation tender.

Maja 6PDF
Maja_6_Maht.pdf -- 394.9 KB

This document provides information regarding House 6, which is part of the Sinimäe residential house renovation tender.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx -- 35.7 KB

The contracting authority AS HOOLEKANDETEENUSED invites bids for renovation works at Sinimäe family houses, including exterior leveling and interior finishing, with a six-month completion period from contract signing.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus Sinimäe.docx -- 26.1 KB

This technical specification details the renovation requirements for the Sinimäe family houses, including flooring replacement and interior finishing works, for which a suitable construction company is sought.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Yhispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 44.9 KB

This power of attorney confirms the authorized representative's rights for joint bidders to participate in the tender procedure and fulfill contractual obligations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works at Sinimäe peremajad is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a fair evaluation process, though it lacks specific sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements. Deadlines are specified, and the CPV code is provided. There's no indication of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The procedure is identified as VO (likely Open Procedure or similar), which is standard.

Clarity85/100

The description of the works is clear, and essential documents like technical specifications, floor plans, and a draft contract are available. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as relative weighting, with cost being primary.

Completeness75/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. A good number of documents (16) are attached, covering specifications, plans, and contractual terms. However, some required documents are not explicitly marked as 'Required' in the AI extraction.

Fairness90/100

The tender process seems fair. Key information like value is disclosed, and the evaluation criteria (cost-based) are clear and objective. Access to documentation is good. The restriction on Russian Federation-connected subcontractors is a geopolitical consideration rather than tailored to specific companies.

Practicality70/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. The contract start date is linked to signing, and the duration is clear. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, which is a minor drawback.

Data Consistency95/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated consistently. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal data consistency.

Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear description of works and available technical documentation.
Fair evaluation criteria with cost as the primary factor.
Well-structured with essential information readily available.
Emphasis on electronic submission and e-procurement.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Some required documents not explicitly marked as 'Required' in AI extraction.
Financing information could be more detailed.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria to align with modern procurement practices.
2. Clarify the 'Required' status for all essential bid preparation documents.
3. Provide more detailed financing information for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline