Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of domestic transport service

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306767
Value
€400,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 04, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Transport Service100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€400,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€472,450
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
317 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this procurement is to conclude framework agreements for the purchase of domestic transport services with up to five successful bidders. Framework agreements will be concluded for services with a duration of up to 48 months or a maximum cost of EUR 400,000 for all framework agreements combined, whichever occurs first.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks domestic passenger transport services with a sole evaluation criterion of price. Winning requires a highly competitive cost structure, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and a clear demonstration of operational reliability. Focus on optimizing pricing within the cost table and highlighting fleet age and driver qualifications will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: The most cost-effective solution for reliable domestic passenger transport.

Proven Reliability: Experienced provider with a modern, compliant fleet and qualified personnel.

Seamless Operations: Guaranteed compliance and operational excellence for Tartu Ülikooli Kliinikum.

Key Opportunities
Price Optimization within Lisa 3
Leveraging Fleet Age and Condition
Demonstrating Driver Qualification
Framework Agreement Structure
Key Challenges
Intense Price Competition

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore economies of scale, efficient route planning, and optimized vehicle utilization. Consider offering slightly lower margins to secure a framework agreement, anticipating future mini-competitions.

Meeting All Technical Specifications Precisely

Conduct a detailed review of 'Lisa 1_Riigisisene teenus_tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Lisa 2_Raamlepingu projekt_riigisisene transporditeenus'. Ensure every bus in the proposed fleet meets the age, air conditioning, and luggage space requirements. Have documentation readily available for verification.

Exclusion Ground Compliance (Russian Federation)

Implement robust due diligence processes for all owners, directors, and key personnel, as well as any potential subcontractors, to ensure no association with the Russian Federation. Maintain clear records of this verification.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established domestic transport provider with a modern, well-maintained fleet (under 10 years old), a strong pool of qualified drivers, and a proven track record of reliable passenger transport operations. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational cost structure enabling them to offer the lowest possible price while meeting all technical and legal requirements.
Key Requirements
Lowest Bid Price
Buses no older than 10 years
Valid passenger transport operating license
Qualified drivers
Buses equipped with air conditioning
Sufficient luggage space
No association with the Russian Federation
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably superior cost-efficiency model that allows for the lowest price while maintaining high operational standards.
A proactive approach to fleet management and driver training that ensures consistent service quality and reliability, even at a competitive price point.
A clear and concise submission that leaves no room for ambiguity regarding compliance with all technical and legal requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to local employment and fair labor practices for drivers. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Transport Service (Price)100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy for the cost table (Lisa 3). Analyze competitor pricing if possible. Ensure all operational costs are accurately accounted for, but identify areas for efficiency to drive down the final price. Consider the long-term potential of framework agreements and mini-competitions when setting initial prices.

Recommendations7
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given that price is the sole evaluation criterion (100%), a winning bid must offer the absolute lowest price in the cost table (Lisa 3). Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis to identify all possible efficiencies and cost reductions without compromising essential service quality or compliance.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Verify Fleet Age and Condition
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all proposed buses are demonstrably no older than 10 years. Have clear documentation (e.g., registration certificates, maintenance logs) ready to prove compliance. This is a non-negotiable technical requirement.

Prevents immediate disqualification and ensures eligibility for evaluation.
Confirm No Russian Federation Association
CriticalMed effort

Implement a rigorous internal process to verify that the bidding entity, its owners, directors, and any proposed subcontractors have no association with the Russian Federation. Document this verification process thoroughly.

Prevents mandatory exclusion and ensures legal compliance.
Thoroughly Complete Cost Table (Lisa 3)
HighMed effort

Pay meticulous attention to detail when filling out Lisa 3. Ensure all fields are completed accurately and consistently with the overall pricing strategy. Any errors or omissions could lead to disqualification or a suboptimal score.

Ensures accurate evaluation of the bid price and avoids potential rejection.
Highlight Driver Qualifications and Experience
HighLow effort

While price is paramount, demonstrating a highly qualified and experienced driver pool can build confidence in service reliability. Detail driver training programs, certifications, and years of experience in passenger transport.

Subtly enhances perceived value and reliability, potentially influencing decision-making if prices are very close.
Prepare for Mini-Competitions
MediumMed effort

Understand that framework agreements lead to mini-competitions. While initial pricing should be aggressive, consider a strategy that allows for continued profitability in subsequent rounds. This might involve slightly higher margins in the initial bid if there's a strong likelihood of winning a framework agreement.

Ensures long-term viability and profitability beyond the initial award.
Ensure Air Conditioning and Luggage Space
HighMed effort

Confirm that all buses meet the air conditioning and sufficient luggage space requirements as per Lisa 1. This is a key technical specification that must be met for all vehicles intended for use.

Prevents disqualification based on technical non-compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential operational standards. Emphasize a lean operational model and efficient fleet management to justify the lowest price. Highlight compliance with all technical specifications as a baseline, but focus the core message on unbeatable value for money.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit an application according to Form II.
--Submit the cost of transport services according to the provided cost table (Lisa 3).
--For joint bidders, submit a Power of Attorney (Vorm I).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be associated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must possess a valid passenger transport operating license.
--Must confirm no subcontractors are associated with the Russian Federation.
--Must declare business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must ensure domestic passenger transport.
--Buses must be no older than 10 years.
--Buses must be equipped with air conditioning.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--N/A (No specific financial thresholds mentioned, but cost is the sole evaluation criterion).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306767_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.4 KB

Bidders must possess a valid passenger transport operating license, confirm no subcontractors linked to the Russian Federation, and declare any business secrets.

Esitada pakkumuse maksumus vastavalt Lisa 3 Maksumuse tabel.XLS
Lisa 3_Maksumuse tabel, Hindamiskriteeriumid.... -- 19.9 KB

Bidders must submit their transportation service cost according to the attached cost table, where the lowest price is the evaluation criterion.

Esitada hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus vastavalt HD Lisa 4 vormile IIDOC
Vorm II_Avaldus.docx -- 17.0 KB

The bidder must submit an application for participation in the procurement procedure according to the provided Form II, confirming agreement with the terms.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306767_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306767_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.4 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for completion.

HD_Juhised pakkujale_Riigisisene transporditeenusPDF
HD_Juhised pakkujale_Riigisisene transpordite... -- 295.3 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the domestic transport service procurement, clarifying general conditions, the object of the procurement, and bid preparation requirements.

Lisa 1_Riigisisene transporditeenus_tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1_Riigisisene transporditeenus_tehniline... -- 204.1 KB

The bidder must ensure domestic passenger transport, possessing the relevant operating license, suitable buses (up to 10 years old, with air conditioning, sufficient luggage space), qualified drivers, and valid traffic and liability insurance.

Lisa 2_Raamlepingu projekt_riigisisene transporditeenusPDF
Lisa 2_Raamlepingu projekt_riigisisene transp... -- 452.2 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for domestic transport services, defining the parties, general terms, contract object, and ordering period, forming an integral part of the tender documentation.

Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 13.3 KB

This power of attorney is required for joint bidders to designate a single representative for submitting the bid, concluding, and fulfilling the contract for the domestic transport service procurement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for domestic transport services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical drawbacks regarding document accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of reported disputes or suspensions contributes to a good score. The inclusion of 'Negotiation Allowed' and 'WTO/GPA' characteristics suggests adherence to international procurement standards.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement objective and the framework agreement structure is clear. Requirements for bidders, including technical and eligibility criteria, are well-documented. The sole evaluation criterion (price) is explicitly stated, enhancing clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' without further detail and the 'Location Info: Täpne piirkond määramata' (Precise region not specified) could be more detailed. The requirement for specific forms (Form II, Vorm I) and cost tables (Lisa 3) is clear, but the actual forms are not directly linked in the provided text.

Precise location information is not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through objective evaluation criteria (lowest price) and e-procurement. The disclosure of the estimated value and the framework agreement structure with up to five bidders allows for broad competition. The exclusion of bidders associated with the Russian Federation is a specific requirement, but it is a geopolitical consideration rather than company-specific tailoring.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is positive. However, the lack of direct URLs for all required documents (e.g., Form II, Lisa 3) and the mention of an XML ESPD format not supported for AI analysis suggest potential minor practical hurdles for bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Direct URLs for all required submission forms and tables are not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logical and sequential. The contract duration and tender validity period are clearly specified. No suspensions or disputes are reported.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While it is EU funded (implied by the context of public tenders in the EU), this is not explicitly stated as a characteristic. This lack of specific sustainability criteria results in a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Framework agreement structure allowing multiple bidders.
Well-defined technical and eligibility requirements.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing direct URLs for some required submission documents.
Vague location information.

Recommendations

1. Include specific sustainability criteria in future tenders.
2. Provide direct download links or clear instructions for accessing all required submission forms and tables.
3. Specify the precise geographical area for the transport services.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline