Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login15 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
8 documents available with AI summaries
The contracting authority will check subcontractors' background for fraud and money laundering, requiring responses on convictions, remedial actions, and electronic availability.
This document outlines the requirements for joint bidder authorization, bid submission conditions, cost form completion, subcontractor exclusion, and sanctions compliance, necessary for participating in the Kohtla-Järve city road pothole repair tender.
This document is a tender cost form where the bidder must submit their price offer for asphalt concrete pavement pothole repair works.
The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.
The foundational documents for the pothole repair of asphalt concrete pavements in Kohtla-Järve city contain general information and context about the procurement procedure.
The contracting authority is seeking bids for pothole repairs on asphalt surfaces of roads in Kohtla-Järve, involving milling, new asphalt layer application, and crack repair.
This document is a draft construction contract outlining the terms and obligations for the pothole repair of asphalt concrete pavements in Kohtla-Järve city.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for pothole repair on Kohtla-Järve city roads is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain documents.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is identified as 'A' (likely open procedure), and there are no immediate flags for disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The use of Hankepass (ESPD) aligns with standard European practices.
The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are referenced. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. However, the full technical description and contract draft are not directly accessible for immediate review without downloading separate documents, which slightly impacts overall clarity.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the tender documents are presented as separate files, and while the number of documents is listed, direct links to all content summaries within the main tender notice could be improved. The 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is noted as not supported for AI analysis, indicating a potential accessibility issue for automated systems.
The tender is open to all bidders, with objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission promotes fairness. The Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard self-declaration tool. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a level playing field.
The tender utilizes electronic submission and e-procurement, which are practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is given in 'months' for tender validity but the contract start date is specific. The reliance on downloading multiple separate documents for full understanding can be less practical than integrated information.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logical and sequential. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period of 2 months aligns with typical practices.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required