Tenders

Internal construction and renovation works at the Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre for 2026-2028

Open
Deadline
22 days left
March 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306683
Value
€800,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of construction works60%
Cost of demolition works20%
Cost of plumbing, electrical, and ventilation works10%
Works related to openings10%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 24, 2026

Tender Opening

March 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€800,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is construction and renovation works in the educational buildings of the Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre located at Tatari 13 and Toom-Kooli 4 for a period of 2 years.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submission of a cost table for the bid in the specified format.
--Submission of a technical description.
--Submission of a power of attorney for joint bidders, if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Compliance with EU sanctions for subcontractors and suppliers.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The contractor must be a single company responsible for the entire construction work from start to finish.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission of a technical description covering interior construction and renovation works, including special parts and measurements.
--Adherence to current laws and standards.
--Provision of a minimum 24-month warranty for the works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submission of a cost table for the bid, excluding VAT.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306683_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.5 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of a bid cost table, a minimum 24-month warranty, compliance with EU sanctions for subcontractors and suppliers, and a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable.

Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 79.7 KB

The bid cost table is a required form where the cost of construction and renovation works, excluding VAT, must be entered.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306683_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids based on the cost of construction, demolition, plumbing, electrical, ventilation works, and works related to openings, with the lowest price receiving the most points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306683_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.0 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.

Raamlepingu projektDOC
Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 27.3 KB

This framework agreement defines the internal construction and renovation works for the Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre for the years 2026-2028, outlining the procedure and conditions for ordering services.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 2.3 MB

Bidders must submit a technical description covering interior construction and renovation works, including specialized trades and measurements, adhering to applicable laws and standards, and providing a minimum 24-month warranty.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 13.9 KB

This power of attorney is required for joint bidders to designate a single representative to act in all matters related to the tender procedure and framework agreement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction and renovation works at the Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and a slightly more streamlined submission process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. No disputes are noted. The procedure type 'E' (Open procedure) and 'A' (Negotiated procedure) are indicated, which is standard. The presence of a framework agreement with reopening competition is also a common and legally compliant practice.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, specifying the locations and duration. Requirements for technical descriptions, warranties, and cost tables are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting', which implies a clear methodology, though specific weights are not detailed here.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like 'Vastavustingimused' (Compliance Conditions), 'Tehniline kirjeldus' (Technical Specification), and 'Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel' (Bid Cost Table) are marked as required. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is noted as not supported for AI analysis, and its necessity might be unclear if the RHR system handles it.

The necessity and usability of the ESPD XML file for AI analysis is unclear.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria are objective, focusing on cost and technical capability. The use of e-procurement is standard. The requirement for a single company to be responsible for the entire work, while potentially practical for project management, could be seen as slightly restrictive if not justified by specific project needs.

Requirement for a single company to be responsible for the entire work might limit competition.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. The contract start date is provided. However, the 'Framework Agreement' characteristic with 'REOPENING_COMPETITION' implies a multi-stage process which might add complexity. The maximum number of participants (4) in a framework agreement reopening competition is a practical limitation.

The framework agreement with reopening competition might add procedural complexity.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, which is positive. However, there is no specific detail on how these are integrated into the evaluation or requirements, and it is not EU funded. The focus on 'innovation' is absent.

Lack of specific details on how green and social criteria are applied.
No explicit focus on innovation.

Strengths

Clear description of works and locations
Well-defined required documents
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission
Disclosure of estimated value and reasonable timeline

Concerns

Limited detail on sustainability criteria implementation
Potential restriction on competition due to single company requirement
Ambiguity regarding ESPD XML file usability

Recommendations

1. Provide more specific details on the implementation of green and social criteria.
2. Clarify the purpose and usability of the ESPD XML file for bidders.
3. Consider if the single-company responsibility requirement is strictly necessary and if alternative approaches could be considered.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline