Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login9 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation and provide a joint bidder authorization if applicable.
Bidders must submit a detailed technical specification table confirming their offered electronic total stations and accessories meet the procurer's requirements, including details on equipment makes, manufacturers, and specifications.
This document requires the bidder to complete a table detailing the costs of electronic total stations and accessories, including unit prices and total costs with tax.
The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses.
The draft contract project defines the terms between the buyer and seller for the purchase, delivery, and training of electronic total stations and accessories.
This document clarifies tender procedure details, including lot division, joint submissions, confidentiality, and grounds for bid rejection.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for electronic tachometers is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on providing more detailed documentation for certain aspects.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. The absence of disputes and a clear status indicate good legal standing. The exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical requirement, not necessarily a legal compliance issue in the broader sense.
The description of the required equipment and its integrated functionality is clear. Technical and financial requirements are well-defined, and the evaluation criterion is explicitly stated. The availability of multiple documents further clarifies the tender's scope.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' without further detail and the limited number of required documents (compared to the total of 8 available) could be improved. The absence of a specific document for 'Mandatory Exclusion Grounds' beyond the 'Vastavustingimused' document might be a minor gap.
The tender is fair, with the bid price as the sole evaluation criterion, ensuring objectivity. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a specific, potentially restrictive criterion, but it is clearly stated and not tailored to a single company.
E-submission and e-procurement are in place. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the reliance on a specific e-procurement portal URL for opening place is standard but could be supplemented with direct document links.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the timeline is consistent.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded (implied by e-procurement standards), this is not explicitly stated as a characteristic. This area could be enhanced.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required