Tenders

Reconstruction of Smuuli Skatepark

Open
Deadline
21 days left
March 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306557
Value
€200,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 24, 2026

Tender Opening

March 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€200,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design and construction works for the Smuuli Skatepark located at Juhan Smuuli 7a in Kuressaare, within the scope fixed in Document 2 – Technical Specification.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

23 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-24 12:00:00.
--The tender is for the reconstruction of Smuuli skatepark.
--The contracting authority is Saaremaa Vallavalitsus.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Absence of grounds for exclusion (fraud, corruption, money laundering, human trafficking) as per "vastavustingimused.pdf".
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must register their economic activity.
--Bidders must not be subject to sanctions.
--Bidders must provide confirmation of economic activity registration.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender is for reconstruction of Smuuli skatepark, including design and construction works.
--The contractor will be the main contractor for the entire project.
--The project involves technical and economic integration, requiring a single main contractor.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 200,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306557_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306557_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.9 KB

The tender document "Compliance Conditions" clarifies the submission of joint offers, offer compliance with conditions, economic activity registration, and absence of sanctions, which are necessary for participating in the Smuuli skatepark reconstruction tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306557_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

In the tender "Smuuli skatepark reconstruction", bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306557_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.

Dokument 1 - Juhised pakkujalePDF
Dokument_1_Juhised_pakkujale.pdf -- 203.7 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the Smuuli skatepark reconstruction tender, detailing procurement procedures and requirements.

Dokument 2 - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Dokument_2_Tehniline_kirjeldus.pdf -- 290.1 KB

The contracting authority Saaremaa Vallavalitsus is seeking a general contractor for the reconstruction of Smuuli skatepark, encompassing design and construction works according to the technical specification and sketch project.

Dokument 3 - Hankelepingu projektPDF
Dokument_3_Hankelepingu_projekt.pdf -- 195.4 KB

This document is the draft construction contract for the reconstruction of the Smuuli skatepark, outlining general and specific terms, including contractor and client details, project stage, warranty period, and other contractual specifics.

Vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm_1_Ühispakkujate_volikiri.docx -- 15.4 KB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to represent others in a joint bid and confirming joint and several liability for contract performance.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of Smuuli skatepark is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies solely on cost for evaluation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard. The status '11' typically indicates an active tender.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, specifying the location and the nature of the works (design and construction). Key documents like the technical specification, sketch project, and contract draft are referenced. The rationale for not dividing the tender into lots is well-explained.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Tender Valid' duration of 3 months is provided, but the actual submission deadline is March 24, 2026, with a contract start date of April 20, 2026, leaving a very tight window for evaluation and award within the tender validity period. Not all documents are fully accessible or analyzable by AI (e.g., .asice, .xml).

Tight window between submission deadline and contract start date relative to tender validity period.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting' with a clear indication that bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points. This sole reliance on price might be considered less fair than a multi-criteria approach, but it is transparently disclosed. Access to documents is generally good, though some formats are not machine-readable.

Sole reliance on lowest price as the evaluation criterion.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. A clear contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is specified as 'PERIOD' without a concrete end date, though the tender validity is 3 months.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Contract duration specified as 'PERIOD' without a concrete end date.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically ordered, with reveal date preceding submission and opening dates. The contract start date is after the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents or AI-extracted requirements. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Strengths

Clear project description and location.
Well-defined technical specifications and contract draft available.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Transparent evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Sole reliance on lowest price for evaluation.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Potential tightness in award timeline given tender validity and contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating non-price evaluation criteria to encourage quality and innovation.
2. Include specific sustainability requirements (e.g., environmental materials, social impact) in future tenders.
3. Review the timeline to ensure sufficient time for evaluation and award within the tender validity period.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline