Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Pärnu County, Tori Municipality, Sauga village, Jänesselja street 10 (TC0999)

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306520
Value
€17,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 03, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€17,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The tender is announced for construction works (TC0999) in Pärnu County, Tori Municipality, Sauga village, Jänesselja street 10. Build according to the project. The deadline for completion of works is 01.06.2026; If possible and necessary, the contract may be concluded and the execution of works/ordering of services may commence before the estimated start date of the contract validity published in the general data of the tender. If the tender procedure takes longer than this, the contract may be concluded and its execution may commence even after the estimated start date of the contract validity published in the general data. The deadline for completion of works will not change from this.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for electrical installation works in Pärnu County presents a clear opportunity for experienced electrical contractors. The primary evaluation criterion is price, emphasizing cost-competitiveness. Success hinges on demonstrating strong technical capability through past project experience and meticulous attention to site-specific conditions and contractual obligations.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Leadership: Delivering the most competitive price while meeting all technical and contractual requirements.

Proven Expertise: Demonstrating a strong history of successfully completing similar electrical construction projects.

Site-Specific Diligence: Proactively addressing all site-specific challenges and contractual obligations outlined in the tender documents.

Key Opportunities
The 100% weighting on price is a significant opportunity for cost-focused bidders to secure the contract.
The explicit mention of site familiarization and accounting for challenging conditions allows for differentiation through detailed planning and risk assessment.
The requirement for a responsible person for switching operations highlights the need for qualified personnel, which can be a differentiator if presented effectively.
Key Challenges
The tender has no specified evaluation criteria beyond price, making it difficult to optimize for non-price factors.

Focus exclusively on achieving the lowest possible price while ensuring all mandatory and eligibility requirements are met flawlessly. Any perceived non-compliance will likely lead to disqualification.

The estimated value of 17,000 EUR is relatively low, which might attract smaller, highly competitive bids, potentially driving prices down further.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability at a potentially very low price point. Leverage efficient project management and resource allocation.

The tender documents (Väikehanke alusdokumendid, Projekt_TC0999) are not directly analyzable by AI, requiring manual review for critical details.

Dedicate significant time to thoroughly review all provided documents, especially the project plans and base documents, to identify any hidden requirements or complexities that could impact cost or execution.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established electrical contractor with a proven track record in similar electrical construction projects, possessing at least one project exceeding 40,000 EUR in value within the last 60 months. The bidder should have a robust understanding of site-specific challenges, including potential power outage limitations and the need for property owner notification, and be capable of delivering a highly competitive price.
Key Requirements
Prior experience with similar electrical construction works, including at least one contract valued at >= 40,000 EUR (excl. VAT) within the last 60 months.
Submission of a list of at least three successfully completed electrical construction work contracts within the last 60 months.
Provision of information about a person responsible for switching operations and work procedures.
Total cost (excluding taxes) submitted using the specified cost table, with 100% weighting on price.
Familiarization with the site and all tender documents, accounting for all necessary works.
Granting permission for inquiries to contract partners regarding previous projects.
Notification of property owners and obtaining necessary permits.
Responsibility for damages and accounting for challenging working conditions/power outage limitations.
Key Discriminators
A highly detailed and accurate cost breakdown that demonstrates efficiency and a deep understanding of the required works, leading to the lowest possible price.
Proactive identification and mitigation of site-specific risks (e.g., power outage limitations) in the bid proposal, showcasing foresight and preparedness.
A clear and concise presentation of the nominated person for switching operations, highlighting their qualifications and experience.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management if it can be achieved without increasing costs, as a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost (excluding taxes)100%

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy based on meticulous cost estimation, efficient resource planning, and understanding of potential economies of scale. Ensure all necessary works are accounted for to avoid cost overruns.

Recommendations7
Meticulously Document Past Experience
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all submitted contracts for past electrical construction works clearly demonstrate similarity to the tender's scope and meet the minimum value requirement of 40,000 EUR. Provide all requested details and grant explicit permission for verification.

Ensures eligibility and builds credibility.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price weighting, conduct thorough cost analysis to submit the lowest possible competitive bid. Factor in all site-specific conditions and potential challenges to avoid underbidding and subsequent cost overruns.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Thorough Site and Document Review
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to meticulously review the project plans (Projekt_TC0999) and all base documents (Väikehanke alusdokumendid). Identify all necessary works, potential complexities, and site-specific constraints (e.g., power outage limitations).

Prevents omissions, ensures accurate costing, and demonstrates diligence.
Appoint and Detail Responsible Person
HighLow effort

Clearly identify and provide comprehensive information about the designated person responsible for switching operations and work procedures, highlighting their qualifications and relevant experience.

Meets a specific mandatory requirement.
Address Challenging Conditions Proactively
HighMed effort

In the bid narrative or proposal, explicitly acknowledge and outline how challenging working conditions and power outage limitations will be managed. This demonstrates foresight and preparedness.

Reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority and can justify pricing.
Clarify Right of Representation
MediumLow effort

Ensure all documentation regarding the right of representation is accurate and readily available, as required by submission requirements.

Avoids administrative disqualification.
Consider Subtle Social Value Commitments
LowLow effort

If feasible without impacting price, include a brief mention of commitment to local sourcing or sustainable waste disposal practices. This is not a primary driver but can be a minor positive note.

Potential minor positive impression.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or compliance. Emphasize the proven experience and meticulous planning that underpins the competitive price.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 3 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Technical (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must include a total cost (excluding taxes), which will be evaluated with 100% weighting, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
--Bidders must use the specified cost table for submitting the bid price.
--Bidders must provide information regarding their right of representation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory or voluntary exclusion grounds as specified in the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must have prior experience with similar electrical construction works.
--At least one of the previous experience contracts for similar electrical construction works must have a value of at least 40,000 EUR (excluding VAT).
--Bidders must submit a list of at least three electrical construction work contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306520_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a bid, including requirements for the bid cost table, personnel with switching rights and a designated person responsible for work operations, and information on representation rights.

Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioonDOC
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon.docx -- 22.3 KB

Bidders must submit a list of at least three successfully completed electricity construction contracts from the last 60 months, with at least one valued at a minimum of 40,000 euros (excl. VAT), and grant permission for inquiries to contracting parties.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306520_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that the total bid cost (excluding taxes) will be assessed with a 100% weighting, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306520_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds for tender participants and sets qualification criteria, specifically requiring prior experience with similar electrical construction projects, including at least one contract valued at 40,000 EUR or more.

Lisatingimused_TC0999DOC
Lisatingimused_TC0999.docx -- 15.4 KB

This document outlines additional conditions and requirements for bidders, emphasizing the need to review the site and documents, include all related works in the bid, notify property owners, obtain permits, take responsibility for damages, and account for challenging working conditions and power outage limitations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electrical construction works is generally well-structured and compliant for a small procurement, providing clear requirements and an objective evaluation criterion. However, the lack of analyzed critical project documents and a slightly restrictive experience requirement are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears legally compliant for a small procurement, with reasonable deadlines (12 days), a clearly defined procedure type, and appropriate CPV codes. The 'EU Funded' characteristic implies adherence to broader EU principles. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value is a minor ambiguity but does not hinder compliance.

Clarity75/100

The tender description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and understandable. Evaluation criteria are specified as 100% price weighting. However, there is an inconsistency between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit '100% weighting' for price, which could cause confusion.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% price').
Completeness70/100

Most basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. Key requirements and criteria are defined. However, critical documents such as the project details (ZIP) and cost table (XLS) were not analyzed, which limits the ability to fully assess the completeness of the technical and financial scope.

Critical project documents (ZIP, XLS) were not analyzed, limiting full completeness assessment.
Fairness70/100

The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission, objective 100% price evaluation, and reasonable deadlines. However, the technical experience requirement (one previous contract > 40,000 EUR for a 17,000 EUR tender) is relatively high and could disproportionately limit participation from smaller companies. The 95-day factoring payment option, while optional, might also be less favorable for SMEs.

Experience requirement (one contract > 40,000 EUR) is relatively high for a 17,000 EUR tender.
The 95-day payment term option via factoring, while optional, could be less attractive for smaller businesses.
Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is supported, contract start date is known, and detailed financing information is provided. The work completion deadline is also clear. The absence of a direct URL for all tender documents in the provided text is a minor practical point, assuming they are accessible via the e-procurement system.

Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting descriptions of the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% price').

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% price').
Sustainability50/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded' and includes performance conditions related to the contracting authority's ethical code and occupational health and safety requirements, which are positive social aspects. However, there are no explicit criteria for green procurement or innovation focus.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No specific innovation focus mentioned.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% price weighting).
Detailed financing conditions and payment terms.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline for the tender's scope.
Explicit performance conditions including ethical and OHS requirements.

Concerns

Critical project documents (ZIP, XLS) were not analyzed, limiting full completeness assessment.
Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% price').
Experience requirement (one contract > 40,000 EUR) is relatively high for a 17,000 EUR tender, potentially limiting SME participation.
The 95-day payment term option via factoring, while optional, could be less attractive for smaller businesses.
Lack of explicit green or innovation-focused sustainability criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical tender documents, especially project specifications and cost tables, are provided in an easily analyzable format or summarized comprehensively.
2. Clarify the exact nature of the evaluation criteria to resolve the inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' and '100% price'.
3. Re-evaluate the proportionality of the experience requirement (40,000 EUR for a 17,000 EUR tender) to encourage broader competition, especially for small procurements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline