Purchase of medium voltage underground cable with a cross-section of 300 mm² (LC1954, LC1955)

This tender for 4700m of 300mm² medium voltage cable is primarily driven by price. Success hinges on demonstrating strict compliance with Elektrilevi's technical specifications (P368), securing the lowest possible price, and ensuring a seamless supply chain to meet the 30.04.2026 deadline. While social and green procurement are not explicitly weighted, demonstrating responsible sourcing and efficient logistics can indirectly enhance perceived value.

Uncompromising Technical Compliance and Reliable Supply

Cost Leadership Through Optimized Supply Chain

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring full compliance. This requires meticulous cost analysis, efficient sourcing, and optimized logistics. Any deviation from the lowest price will result in disqualification or a significantly lower score.

Conduct an exhaustive review of 'P368 Nõuded 6-20 kV keskpingel kasutatavatele kaablitele'. Ensure the proposed cable from the chosen manufacturer precisely matches all technical parameters, including insulation type, voltage rating, conductor size, and any specific testing or certification requirements. Obtain and submit all supporting documentation as required in Form 1.

Given that total cost is the sole evaluation criterion, develop a pricing strategy that aims to be the absolute lowest. This involves scrutinizing all cost components: raw materials, manufacturing, logistics, overhead, and profit margin. Explore economies of scale and potential supplier discounts.

Develop a detailed supply chain and logistics plan that guarantees delivery of 4700m of cable by 30.04.2026. Confirm production capacity with the manufacturer, secure transportation, and build in contingency for potential delays. Clearly articulate this plan in the bid.

Thoroughly review and confirm compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, particularly regarding origin of residence/establishment and materials (no Russia/Belarus). Ensure all required confirmations are provided accurately.

While not explicitly weighted, confirm willingness and ability to use the Elektrilevi partner portal. If possible, briefly mention experience with similar portals to signal ease of integration and communication.

As per instructions, compare quantities and report any inaccuracies. While the quantity seems straightforward, familiarize yourself with the project context to ensure no assumptions are made that could lead to cost overruns or non-compliance.

This tender for medium voltage cables is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor points regarding payment terms and document accessibility.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The financing condition, while detailed, could be perceived as slightly complex.

The description of the required cable is clear, and technical specifications are referenced. Requirements for submission and eligibility are documented. Evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, with price being the primary factor.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the exact geographical location is not specified, and some document formats (.zip) were not analyzed, potentially hiding crucial details.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (lowest price). The requirement to use the Elektrilevi partner portal is standard for e-procurement. There are no overtly tailored requirements to specific companies.

E-submission is mandated. A contract start date is provided. Financing conditions are detailed, including payment terms and an optional factoring program with a link for more information. The duration is specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. No suspension or disputes are indicated.

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.