Skip to main content
Tenders

Masonry and insulation works at Iru Power Plant

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306348
Value
€300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 17, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€300,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Masonry and insulation works at Iru Power Plant. Detailed requirements for the works are in the base document "Technical Specification", the framework agreement draft is in the base document "Framework Agreement Draft".
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit reference contracts using Form 1.
--Bidders must submit unit prices and total bid cost without VAT using Form 4.
--The contracting authority reserves the right to conduct negotiations within the scope of a simplified procurement, the subject and scope of which will be determined by the contracting authority.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not fall under exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must have at least one reference contract for masonry works on an 80 MW heat and power plant within the last 60 months.
--Reference contracts must prove proper execution of masonry works, including concreting, installation of anchors, and installation of zinc sheets.
--Bidders must submit Form 2: Welding Coordinator's letter of confirmation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Welding Coordinator's letter of confirmation must attest to the bidder's agreement to participate in the tender and ensure proper guidance, control, and documentation of welding works according to current norms.
--Letter of confirmation from the responsible person for pressure equipment works must confirm their consent and competence for the execution of the specified tender.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit unit prices and total bid cost without VAT using Form 4.
--The total bid cost without VAT will be fixed until the end of the contract period.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306348_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.6 KB

This document clarifies the procedure for submitting joint offers, bid compliance with conditions, and cost submission requirements, including the use of Form 4.

Vorm 1. "Referentslepingud"DOC
Vorm 1 Referentslepingud.docx -- 30.2 KB

The bidder must submit reference contracts proving the proper execution of masonry works for heat production equipment in at least one 80 MW heat and power plant within the last 60 months, including concrete formwork, installation of anchor stones, and zinc sheet installation.

Vorm 2 "Keevituskoordinaatori kinnituskiri"DOC
Vorm 2 Keevituskoordinaatori kinnituskiri.doc... -- 26.4 KB

The Welding Coordinator's letter of confirmation certifies the bidder's agreement to participate in the tender and ensures proper guidance, control, and documentation of welding works according to applicable standards.

Vorm 3 "Surveseadmetööde vastutava isiku kinnituskiri"DOC
Vorm 3 Surveseadmetööde vastutava isiku kinni... -- 24.8 KB

The bidder must submit Form 3, confirming the responsible person for pressure equipment works' consent and competence to fulfill the mentioned procurement.

Vorm 4 "Ühikhinnad ja pakkumuse maksumus"XLS
Vorm 4 Ühikhinnad ja pakkumuse maksumus.xlsx -- 283.4 KB

Bidders must submit unit prices and total bid cost on Form 4, excluding VAT, which will be fixed until the end of the contract period.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306348_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306348_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.6 KB

Bidders must confirm they do not fall under exclusion grounds and have at least one reference contract for 80 MW thermal power plant masonry works within the last 60 months.

Juhised pakkujatelePDF
Juhised pakkujatele_Lihthange_14092022.pdf -- 695.0 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders in simplified procurements, outlining the procedure rules, submission requirements, and the contracting authority's rights.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for masonry and insulation works at Iru power plant is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on attached documents for detailed technical specifications.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is identified. Deadlines are reasonable for a simplified procurement. No disputes are noted. The financing condition refers to an attached framework agreement project.

Clarity80/100

The title and basic description are clear. Key requirements are outlined, and reference is made to attached documents ('Tehniline kirjeldus', 'Raamlepingu projekt') for detailed specifications. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' with cost being primary.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the detailed technical and contractual requirements are entirely dependent on attached documents, some of which are not directly accessible for AI analysis (e.g., .zip files). This reduces the completeness of the immediately available information.

Detailed technical and contractual specifications are solely within attached documents, some of which are not directly analyzable.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for negotiations, which can be a positive for achieving optimal outcomes but requires careful management to maintain fairness. The requirement for a reference contract on an 80 MW heat and power plant within the last 60 months is specific but not necessarily tailored to a single company, as such plants exist. The maximum of one participant is unusual and potentially restrictive.

Maximum of one participant is highly restrictive and may limit competition.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. The contract start date is provided. However, the financing condition refers to an attached document, and the reliance on external documents for core requirements can impact immediate practicality for bidders.

Reliance on external documents for core technical and contractual details can impact immediate practicality.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender. The sustainability score is low due to the absence of these common elements in modern tenders.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear basic information and title.
Electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines for a simplified procurement.
Specific and relevant CPV code.

Concerns

Reliance on external documents for critical technical and contractual details.
Unusual restriction of maximum one participant.
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical technical and contractual details are accessible within the main tender document or easily linked.
2. Reconsider the 'Max Participants: 1' rule to encourage broader competition.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline