Tenders

Replacement of the substation at the Mining Museum

Open
Deadline
13 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306280
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 17, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Lowest total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
87
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

A replacement substation is being procured for the address Jaama tn 100, Kohtla-Nõmme alev, Toila vald, Ida-Viru maakond.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Submit an ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney form (Form 1) signed by all joint tenderers.
--If relying on a third party's resources for qualification, submit a consent form (Form 2) from the third party.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Tenderers (and subcontractors) must not fall under the exclusion grounds specified in the procurement pass (hankepass).
--Tenderers must declare that they do not fall under mandatory exclusion grounds (via ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Tenderers (and subcontractors) must meet the qualification conditions specified in the procurement pass (hankepass).
--If submitting a joint bid, all joint tenderers must confirm joint and several liability.
--If relying on a third party's resources for qualification, the third party must confirm consent and joint and several liability.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Tenderers must submit technical specifications and drawings for the proposed solution.
--Subcontractors' qualifications must be proven.
--Tenderers must declare and provide data on all subcontractors involved in the bid.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include unit prices and total cost for all components of the substation replacement works, excluding taxes.
--The lowest total cost without taxes is the sole evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306280_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 21.3 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage, including requirements for proving subcontractor qualifications and submitting a procurement pass.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306280_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.7 KB

This document outlines the tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tender power of attorney, confirmation of offer compliance with basic documents, submission of technical specifications and drawings, and principles for equivalence and business secrets.

Vorm 3. Töömahtude tabelXLS
Vorm 3 Mahutabel ja seadmete spetsifikatsioon... -- 21.3 KB

This document is a table of work volumes where the tenderer must provide unit prices and total costs for various components of the mining museum substation replacement works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306280_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation methodology for the Kaevandusmuuseum substation replacement tender, where the sole criterion is the lowest total cost without taxes, which will receive the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306280_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.1 KB

This document is an explanatory ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) that introduces the qualification conditions and exclusion grounds set by the contracting authority, but it is for informational purposes only and not for submission.

AlusdokumentPDF
Alusdokument.pdf -- 614.6 KB

This basic document outlines the general procurement procedure, submission requirements, evaluation process, and contract terms for the Mining Museum's substation replacement public tender.

Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 49.6 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms and documents that will be signed with the successful bidder for the replacement works of the Mining Museum's substation.

Vorm 1. Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 63.2 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, confirming the submission of a joint bid, appointing an authorized representative, and establishing joint and several liability, requiring signatures from all joint tenderers.

Vorm 2. Tuginetava nõusolekDOC
Vorm 2 - Tuginetava nõusolek.docx -- 62.8 KB

This form is required for tenderers relying on a third party's resources to meet qualification criteria, confirming the third party's consent and joint liability.

Vorm 4. AlltöövõtjadDOC
Vorm 4 Alltöövõtjad.doc -- 51.5 KB

This document is a form where the tenderer must declare and provide information about the subcontractors participating in the bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

87
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a substation replacement is well-structured and highly compliant with legal and procedural requirements, offering clear instructions and objective evaluation criteria. Its main area for improvement lies in the integration of sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance95/100

The tender demonstrates excellent legal compliance, adhering to EU/national regulations, utilizing standard procedures (ESPD, e-procurement), and providing reasonable deadlines. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarity90/100

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are comprehensively documented and understandable, including explicit evaluation criteria (lowest cost). AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and specific.

Completeness95/100

All essential basic information, financial details, timelines, and location data are provided. All 12 documents are listed as attached, ensuring comprehensive information access, despite AI's inability to process two specific file formats.

Fairness85/100

Fairness is high due to objective evaluation criteria (lowest total cost), enabled e-procurement, and reasonable deadlines. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. A minor inconsistency exists regarding value classification.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 150,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Practicality90/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, is EU funded, and clearly specifies the contract duration. The absence of an explicit contract start date is typical for such procurements.

Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistency is the conflicting information regarding the estimated value and its classification.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 150,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Sustainability40/100

While EU funded, the tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to incorporate broader sustainability goals.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost).
High legal compliance, including EU funding and ESPD usage.
Comprehensive and well-structured requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
All essential tender information is provided.

Concerns

Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.
Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Two attached documents were not processable by AI (XML, ASICE), limiting full content analysis.

Recommendations

1. Integrate specific sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders.
2. Clarify the discrepancy regarding the estimated value and its classification.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible and machine-readable formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline