Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and construction of Tiskre bridge

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305943
Value
€80,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Haabersti District Government (hereinafter the contracting authority) invites you (hereinafter the tenderer) to submit a tender for the public procurement procedure, the purpose of which is to conclude a procurement contract (hereinafter the contract) for the design and construction of the Tiskre bridge (hereinafter the subject of the contract or construction work).
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Tiskre bridge design and construction is heavily weighted on price, making cost leadership the primary win theme. Bidders must demonstrate robust cost control and efficiency in both design and construction phases while strictly adhering to all mandatory requirements, particularly the exclusion of Russian-associated entities. Leveraging existing design efficiencies and streamlined construction methodologies will be crucial for competitive pricing.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Price Leadership through Optimized Design and Construction Efficiency

Guaranteed Compliance and Risk-Free Partnership

Swift and Seamless Project Delivery within Budget

Key Opportunities
Leveraging pre-existing design elements or modular construction techniques for steel bridges to reduce design and construction time and cost.
Demonstrating a highly efficient project management and execution plan that minimizes overhead and on-site time, directly impacting the cost estimate.
Proactive identification and mitigation of any potential supply chain risks related to materials or components, ensuring no Russian Federation associations.
Key Challenges
Achieving the lowest possible price while meeting all technical and legal requirements, given the tight 7-month duration and the need for detailed design and construction.

Conduct thorough cost-benefit analysis of all design and construction options. Explore opportunities for value engineering without compromising quality or compliance. Secure competitive pricing from material suppliers and subcontractors early in the bidding process.

Ensuring absolute compliance with the exclusion of any subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation, which requires rigorous due diligence across the entire supply chain.

Implement a strict vetting process for all potential subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written declarations from all parties confirming no association with the Russian Federation. Maintain clear documentation of this vetting process.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering and construction firm with a proven track record in bridge design and construction, particularly steel structures. The ideal bidder will possess strong cost management capabilities, efficient project execution methodologies, and a clear understanding of Estonian construction standards and regulations. They must also have a robust supply chain free from any Russian Federation associations.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
Detailed description of employees' professional certificates, education, work experience, and reference projects.
Construction project prepared according to current legislation and standards.
Design conditions provided by the contracting authority must be followed.
Completed cost estimate form with unit prices for design and construction works.
Total Cost: 100.0% weight
Key Discriminators
The lowest total cost bid.
Demonstrated efficiency in design and construction processes leading to cost savings.
A robust and verifiable supply chain free from any Russian Federation associations.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a formal requirement, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the project execution plan. This can be framed as an efficiency measure (e.g., faster onboarding of local labor) rather than a direct social value add, subtly enhancing the bid's appeal without increasing cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing design, construction methods, and supply chain costs. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns and ensure unit prices are highly competitive. Leverage any economies of scale or pre-existing efficiencies. Thoroughly review the technical description and local conditions to avoid unforeseen costs.

Recommendations6
Rigorous Supply Chain Vetting for Russian Federation Exclusion
CriticalHigh effort

Implement a comprehensive due diligence process for all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure absolute compliance with the exclusion of any entities associated with the Russian Federation. Obtain written confirmations and maintain detailed records.

Prevents mandatory exclusion and ensures legal compliance.
Aggressive Cost Optimization for Lowest Price
CriticalHigh effort

Focus all efforts on achieving the lowest possible total cost. This involves detailed cost engineering, exploring value engineering options, securing competitive material and labor rates, and optimizing construction methodologies for maximum efficiency.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Detailed and Compliant Cost Estimate
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the cost estimate form is completed accurately, with detailed unit prices for both design and construction. Explicitly demonstrate how the estimate considers the technical description and local conditions to avoid any ambiguity or potential for cost overruns.

Meets submission requirements and builds confidence in cost accuracy.
Demonstrate Design and Construction Efficiency
HighMed effort

Highlight any innovative or efficient design approaches (e.g., modular design, prefabrication) and construction methodologies that lead to reduced timelines and costs. Quantify these efficiencies where possible.

Positions the bidder as a cost-effective and efficient partner.
Thorough Employee and Project Experience Documentation
CriticalMed effort

Provide comprehensive and well-organized documentation of employees' professional certificates, education, and relevant work experience. Include detailed reference projects that align with the scope of designing and constructing a steel structure bridge in a park setting.

Meets technical capability requirements and builds credibility.
Review Design Conditions and Eskiis/Mudel
MediumMed effort

Thoroughly analyze the provided design conditions, eskiisid, and mudel (even if AI analysis is limited, manual review is essential) to fully understand the scope and constraints. This will inform cost estimations and technical proposals.

Ensures accurate bidding and avoids scope creep or technical non-compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or compliance. Emphasize the bidder's streamlined processes and efficient resource allocation that enable this competitive pricing. Highlight the absolute certainty of compliance with all mandatory requirements, especially the exclusion of Russian-associated entities, to mitigate perceived risks for the contracting authority.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--A completed cost estimate form must be submitted, including unit prices for design and construction works.
--The cost estimate must consider the technical description and local conditions.
--The tender is conducted through an open procedure in accordance with the Public Procurement Act.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation shall be involved.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they do not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
--Information regarding trade secrets must be provided.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The project involves the design and construction of a steel structure bridge connecting pedestrian paths in a park area.
--The scope includes the design of the bridge and the tidying up of the surrounding area.
--A detailed description of employees' professional certificates, education, work experience, and reference projects is required.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids will be evaluated solely on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305943_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and must provide information on trade secrets and a power of attorney if it is a joint bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305943_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

In the tender for the design and construction of the Tiskre bridge, bids will be evaluated solely based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305943_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

The Procurement Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

Lisa 1. Ehitustööde tehniline kirjeldus. Eskiis ja mudel.DOC
Lisa 1 Ehitustööde tehniline kirjeldus Eskiis... -- 1.1 MB

The tender seeks proposals for the design and construction of the Tiskre bridge, connecting pedestrian paths in a park area, requiring a steel structure and surrounding area landscaping.

Lisa 2 Maksumuse esildise vormDOC
Lisa 2 Maksumuse esildise vorm.docx -- 17.6 KB

Bidders must submit a completed cost proposal form with unit prices for design and construction works, considering the technical specification and site conditions.

Lisa 3 Töötaja CVDOC
Lisa 3 Töötaja CV.docx -- 14.7 KB

The contracting authority requires a detailed description of the proposed employees' professional certificates, education, work experience, and reference projects.

Lisa 4 Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 38.3 KB

This document contains the draft of the works contract, defining the contract terms, annexes, and parties' obligations, forming a crucial part of the tender documentation.

Projekteerimistingimused_2611802_00385_11032026PDF
Projekteerimistingimused_2611802_00385_110320... -- 39.4 KB

The contracting authority provides design conditions for the design and construction of the Tiskre bridge, based on which the construction project must be prepared in accordance with applicable laws and standards.

RHADDOC
RHAD.docx -- 55.8 KB

The Haabersti District Government invites bids for the design and construction of the Tiskre bridge, conducted through an open procurement procedure in accordance with the Public Procurement Act.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of the Tiskre bridge is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard public procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure type (open) is appropriate. No disputes are noted. The exclusion of Russian Federation-associated entities is a specific but common regulatory requirement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the scope of design and construction for a steel structure bridge. Technical requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated. Conditions for participation are generally clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the technical specification, cost proposal form, employee CVs, and contract draft are attached or referenced. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD)' and 'eskiisid'/'Mudel' are not fully accessible for detailed analysis.

Incomplete accessibility of some attached documents (ESPD, zip files).
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access through the e-procurement portal. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadline is reasonable. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The exclusion of entities associated with the Russian Federation, while specific, is a common geopolitical requirement and not tailored to a single company.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is a positive. However, the specific format of the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD)' being an XML file not directly usable by AI analysis and the presence of zip files for sketches and models might pose minor practical challenges for some bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.

Potential minor practical challenges with specific file formats for e-submission.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often implies a higher focus on sustainability. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical description and scope of work.
Objective and straightforward evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined exclusion grounds related to geopolitical factors.

Concerns

Absence of explicit sustainability or innovation requirements.
Minor practical issues with certain document formats for analysis.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or innovation criteria in future tenders.
2. Ensure all essential documents are in easily accessible formats for bidders and analysis tools.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline