Tenders

Purchase of a high-resolution oxygraph with fluorescence capability

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305872
Value
€60,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Acquisition price of the device100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Tender Opening

March 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
79
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

A high-resolution oxygraph with fluorescence capability will be purchased according to the technical specifications.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-04 at 11:00:00.
--Instructions for marking business secrets must be followed.
--The bid must be complete and comply with all tender conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Must meet the conditions for exclusion grounds as specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must meet the qualification requirements specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The bid must not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation exceeding 10% of the total value.
--The bid must confirm compliance with all tender conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The offered device must meet the technical specifications for a high-resolution oxygraph with fluorescence capability.
--The device must comply with general requirements, including parameters, installation, warranty, and delivery conditions.
--The bid must include 1 complete device.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include the acquisition price of the device, which is the sole evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305872_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines tender compliance conditions, including a requirement not to involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation for over 10% of the contract value, instructions for marking business secrets, and a confirmation that the bid complies with all tender terms.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305872_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Tender evaluation is based solely on the acquisition price of the equipment, with the lowest bid receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305872_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and the expected responses from companies regarding qualification requirements and exclusion grounds.

Technical requirements documentPDF
Procurement no 305872_Technical requirements_... -- 88.1 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications and general requirements for the purchase of a high-resolution oxygraph with fluorescence capability for the National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, including device parameters, installation, warranty, and delivery terms.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

79
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and clear, providing comprehensive documentation and promoting fairness through objective evaluation criteria. However, it has notable shortcomings in data consistency and completely lacks any sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD for exclusion and eligibility grounds, assigning an appropriate CPV code, and including a relevant geopolitical clause. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are reported.

Clarity90/100

The tender's description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are exceptionally clear and well-documented. Technical specifications and performance conditions are clearly outlined, making it easy for bidders to understand expectations.

Completeness90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic, financial, and timeline information. A comprehensive set of five supporting documents, including technical specifications and evaluation criteria, is attached.

Fairness85/100

Fairness is high, supported by e-procurement, electronic submission, and a transparent evaluation criterion based solely on the lowest price. The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic for the specialized equipment.

The tender states 'Value Classified: Yes' while simultaneously disclosing an 'Estimated Value: 60,000.00 EUR', which is a contradiction.
Practicality75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality. Contract duration is specified, and a portal URL is provided. However, the exact contract start date is not mentioned.

The contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency60/100

While most data fields are consistent and logical, a significant contradiction exists between the stated 'Estimated Value: 60,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'. This inconsistency could lead to confusion.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 60,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Sustainability20/100

The tender completely lacks any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not identified as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement criteria.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive documentation, including technical specifications and evaluation criteria.
Objective and transparent evaluation based solely on acquisition price.
Full support for e-procurement and electronic submission.
Good legal compliance, utilizing ESPD and including relevant geopolitical clauses.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Concerns

Significant data inconsistency regarding the classification of the estimated value.
Complete absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Lack of an explicit contract start date.
Procedure type 'A' could be more explicitly named for broader understanding.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the discrepancy between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified' to avoid confusion.
2. Integrate sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, lifecycle costs, ethical sourcing) into future tenders.
3. Specify the anticipated contract start date to aid bidder planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline