Tenders

Purchase of video gastroscope

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305857
Value
€60,200
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,200
Duration
60 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
79
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the public procurement is to conclude a procurement contract whereby the Buyer purchases one new video gastroscope and, if necessary, one additional video gastroscope within two years from the conclusion of the Contract.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-06 11:00:00.
--Submit a completed European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit a bidder's statement using the provided form (HD lisa 3), including confirmations of tender conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not fall under any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet the qualification requirements as defined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The offered videogastroscopy device must meet the minimum technical requirements specified in the technical description (HD lisa 1).
--Bidders must provide the actual values of the technical parameters for the offered device.
--The offered device or its components can be "equivalent" to specified standards, technical approvals, control systems, purchase sources, processes, trademarks, patents, types, origins, production methods, labels, or conformity assessment body test reports/certificates.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a price offer for the videogastroscopy device.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305857_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.6 KB

This document outlines the conditions and required documents for submitting a tender, including the bidder's application, power of attorney (if needed), and the technical description, manufacturer's information, and user manual for the offered videogastroscopy equipment.

Pakkuja esitab täidetult HD lisa 1 tabelite 1 kohase tehnilise kirjelduse koos k...DOC
HD lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 24.0 KB

This document details the minimum technical specifications for the videogastroscope to be purchased, requiring bidders to provide the actual values for these parameters.

Pakkuja esitab täidetult HD lisa 3 vormi I kohase Pakkuja avalduse hankemenetlus...DOC
HD lisa 3 Pakkumusvormid.docx -- 82.0 KB

This document contains the bidder's application form with confirmations regarding the tender conditions and, if necessary, a power of attorney form for submitting the offer, which are mandatory parts of the submission.

Pakkuja esitab hinnapakkumuse (pakkumuse maksumuse) HD lisas 4 Hinnapakkumuse vo...XLS
HD lisa 4 Hinnapakkumusvorm.xlsx -- 18.5 KB

This document is a price offer form that the bidder must complete and submit to provide the required price for purchasing a videogastroscopy device and confirm agreement with the tender conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305857_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, stating that the offer price is the sole criterion (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305857_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.2 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for the conditions and format of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), helping bidders understand exclusion grounds and qualification requirements.

Hankelepingu projektPDF
HD lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 256.3 KB

This document is a draft purchase agreement for a videogastroscopy device, outlining the contract terms, including payment conditions, device handover, and the composition of contract documents.

Pakkumuste esitamise ettepanekPDF
HD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 223.5 KB

This document is a proposal for submitting bids for the open procurement procedure "Purchase of a Videogastroscopy Device," outlining the general terms, object, and instructions for preparing the bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

79
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a videogastroscope purchase is well-structured and clear, demonstrating strong compliance with procurement principles and ensuring a fair process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability or social criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing standard forms like ESPD and including 'or equivalent' clauses. The procedure type, while coded 'A', is understood as an open procedure in the local context, and deadlines are reasonable.

Clarity85/100

The tender is exceptionally clear. The description of the procurement object, detailed requirements, and explicit evaluation criteria (lowest price) are well-documented and easy to understand, with clear references to supporting annexes.

Completeness80/100

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, and classification, is provided. The tender references numerous supporting documents, ensuring a comprehensive package for bidders.

Fairness90/100

Fairness is a strong point, with full document access, a clearly disclosed estimated value, reasonable submission time, and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. The 'or equivalent' clause prevents tailoring of requirements.

Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, provides a clear contract start date and duration, and references the draft contract for financing and performance conditions, making it practical for bidders.

Data Consistency90/100

Data consistency is high, with all key fields populated and logical dates. The minor inconsistency of 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value does not significantly impact overall data reliability.

Minor inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' despite estimated value being disclosed.
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader public policy objectives into the procurement process.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and unambiguous requirements and evaluation criteria.
Strong emphasis on fairness with 'or equivalent' clauses and objective pricing.
Comprehensive documentation with all essential information provided.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Good legal compliance with standard practices.

Concerns

Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Minor data inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified' flag.

Recommendations

1. Integrate sustainability and social responsibility criteria into future tenders.
2. Ensure full consistency in data fields, particularly regarding value classification.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline