Skip to main content
Tenders

RMK creative solutions and creative works

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305696
Value
€600,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 04, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Trial work (creative solution)35%
Trial work (creative solution)35%
Bidder's team member portfolio35%
Bidder's team member portfolio30%
Trial work (creative solution)30%
Bidder has previous experience in map work and/or uses a map processing application23%
Bidder's team member portfolio15%
Cost of one (1) hour of Creative Director's work without VAT8%
Cost of one (1) hour of Copywriter's work without VAT8%
Cost of one (1) hour of Graphic Designer's work without VAT8%
Cost of one (1) hour of Creative Director's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Graphic Designer's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Copywriter's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Project Manager's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Creative Director's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Graphic Designer's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Copywriter's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Interior Architect's work without VAT7%
Cost of one (1) hour of Project Manager's work without VAT6%
Cost of one (1) hour of Project Manager's work without VAT6%
Bidder has previous experience in map work and/or uses a map processing application3%
Bidder has previous experience in map work and/or uses a map processing application2%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€600,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

This tender will result in the ordering of creative solutions for exhibitions and campaigns organized at RMK visitor centers and Sagadi Forest Center, information and educational materials used in the activities of visitor centers and Sagadi Forest Center, and directional and informative media located in visitor areas.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (13)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS13
--Bidders must submit a Hankepass (tender pass) as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties.
--The Hankepass must contain the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
--The tender is divided into three parts (implied by ESPD files for parts 1, 2, and 3).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm that their offer complies with all conditions of the tender documents.
--If multiple companies are bidding together, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
--Business secrets must be clarified.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The evaluation will consider the team's portfolio.
--The evaluation will consider trial work.
--The evaluation will consider previous experience.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The evaluation will consider the cost of working hours.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305696_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 42.4 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all tender document conditions, including submitting a joint bidder authorization if applicable and explaining any business secrets.

Pakkuja esitab meeskonna nimekirjaDOC
Meeskonna vorm.docx -- 35.5 KB

Bidders must submit a list of team members including their role, personal details, education, and work experience.

Pakkuja esitab meeskonna nimekirjaDOC
Meeskonna vorm.docx -- 35.5 KB

Bidders must submit a list of team members including their role, personal details, education, and work experience.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305696_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 13.0 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus evaluates bids for creative solutions and creative works by considering hourly costs, team portfolios, sample work, and previous experience.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305696_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 87.6 KB

The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

HankedokumentDOC
HD 305696.docx -- 59.8 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for creative solutions and creative works, covering exhibitions, campaigns, and information/educational materials in three parts.

Hankedokumendi lisa 1 - HindamiskriteeriumidDOC
HD Lisa 1 - Hindamiskriteeriumid.docx -- 51.7 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and their weightage for the RMK creative solutions and services tender, focusing on hourly rates, team portfolios, and sample work.

Raamlepingu projektDOC
Raamlepingu vorm.docx -- 50.9 KB

The State Forest Management Centre is seeking a contractor to provide design services and creative solutions under a framework agreement.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization and confirmation, required for tender submission when multiple companies participate together.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for creative solutions and works is generally well-structured, with clear requirements for technical capability and submission. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and evaluation criteria weighting, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The use of e-procurement is standard. The main weakness is the lack of explicit weighting for evaluation criteria, which could be a minor compliance concern.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria weighting and contract duration reduces overall clarity.

Missing explicit weighting for evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not specified, and while evaluation criteria are mentioned, their specific weighting is missing, which affects the completeness of the information provided to bidders.

Contract duration not specified
Weighting of evaluation criteria not explicitly stated
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and disclosure of value. The criteria mentioned (portfolio, trial work, experience, cost) are objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, indicating a good level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and provides a URL for the opening place. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the financing information is absent, which slightly hinders practicality.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The tender is valid for 3 months, which is consistent with typical tender durations.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This limits its sustainability score.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear description of services
Mandatory use of e-procurement and e-submission
Objective evaluation criteria mentioned (portfolio, experience, cost)
Disclosure of estimated value

Concerns

Missing explicit weighting for evaluation criteria
Contract duration not specified
Contract start date not specified
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clearly state the weighting of each evaluation criterion.
2. Specify the contract duration and the expected contract start date.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline