Purchase of a passenger car
ClosedOriginal Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
18 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including marking business secrets, presenting the offer cost, ensuring the proposed vehicle meets technical requirements, and the need for a power of attorney for joint bidders.
Bidders must submit a confirmation stating that they are not subject to any grounds for exclusion from the public procurement, as per Form KI.
This document is a bidder's confirmation form requiring the bidder to confirm their eligibility and provide a list of relevant past contracts or orders.
This document is the tender notice from aktsiaselts PÄRNU VESI for the purchase of a passenger car (station wagon), outlining the general terms and requirements for submitting a bid.
Tender evaluation will solely be based on the total cost of the car excluding taxes, with the lowest-priced bid receiving maximum points.
This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debt) and qualification conditions, which include at least three years of experience in car sales and servicing, and ensuring maintenance services.
This document is a draft vehicle purchase-sale contract, outlining general terms and identifying the contracting parties, with AS Pärnu Vesi as the buyer.
This document outlines the minimum technical, safety, and comfort requirements for the new M1 category station wagon to be procured, which bidders must confirm compliance with in the provided table.
This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, required for submission when a tender is presented by a consortium or group of companies.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for a station wagon purchase is generally well-structured and clear, with a transparent lowest-price evaluation. However, it exhibits a notable data inconsistency regarding value classification and completely lacks any sustainability considerations.
Score Breakdown
The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, clearly defining the simplified/negotiated procedure (LM) and referencing relevant sections of the Estonian Public Procurement Act. The CPV code is appropriate, and the submission period is reasonable. No disputes or suspensions are reported.
The tender is highly clear, with a precise description of the procurement object and well-structured, understandable requirements. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as lowest price, and performance conditions are clearly linked to the draft contract.
The tender is comprehensive, providing all essential basic, financial, and timeline information. All nine supporting documents are listed with summaries, and requirements, criteria, and location details are thoroughly defined.
Fairness is well-addressed, with electronic submission, transparent lowest-price evaluation, and a clear tie-breaking mechanism (drawing lots). While the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is present, the estimated value is disclosed, mitigating this potential concern. The 3-year experience requirement is common and not indicative of tailoring.
The tender supports electronic submission, which is practical. However, it lacks explicit details on the contract's start date and overall duration beyond the tender validity. Financing conditions are deferred to the contract, which is acceptable but less upfront.
While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a significant inconsistency where the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the 'Estimated Value: 37,125.00 EUR'. This indicates a data quality issue.
The tender completely lacks any focus on sustainability, green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required