Purchase of a passenger car

This tender for a station wagon purchase is generally well-structured and clear, with a transparent lowest-price evaluation. However, it exhibits a notable data inconsistency regarding value classification and completely lacks any sustainability considerations.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, clearly defining the simplified/negotiated procedure (LM) and referencing relevant sections of the Estonian Public Procurement Act. The CPV code is appropriate, and the submission period is reasonable. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender is highly clear, with a precise description of the procurement object and well-structured, understandable requirements. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as lowest price, and performance conditions are clearly linked to the draft contract.

The tender is comprehensive, providing all essential basic, financial, and timeline information. All nine supporting documents are listed with summaries, and requirements, criteria, and location details are thoroughly defined.

Fairness is well-addressed, with electronic submission, transparent lowest-price evaluation, and a clear tie-breaking mechanism (drawing lots). While the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is present, the estimated value is disclosed, mitigating this potential concern. The 3-year experience requirement is common and not indicative of tailoring.

The tender supports electronic submission, which is practical. However, it lacks explicit details on the contract's start date and overall duration beyond the tender validity. Financing conditions are deferred to the contract, which is acceptable but less upfront.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a significant inconsistency where the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the 'Estimated Value: 37,125.00 EUR'. This indicates a data quality issue.

The tender completely lacks any focus on sustainability, green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.