Tenders

Design of Osula school building

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305557
Value
€97,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of design works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 02, 2026

Tender Opening

March 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€97,000
Duration
11 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
87
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a general contractor agreement for the design works and activities for the reconstruction and renovation of the Osula primary school building, located at Osula school, Osula village, Võru municipality, with building register code 120262586 (hereinafter referred to as the object).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-02 12:00:00.
--Include a confirmation from the responsible person.
--Submit the bid cost correctly.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which covers exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit information regarding the undertaking's qualification as required by the contracting authority (via ESPD).
--Agree to the terms of the draft contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The design must be a comprehensive service requiring unified project management, coordinated work processes, and a coherent technical solution.
--The design must adhere to the specified room model, including existing and required areas for various classrooms and other spaces, along with renovation and planning notes (from TK Lisa 2).
--The project must cover all specified design parts and stages: preliminary design, main design, and working design (from TK Lisa 1).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the bid cost correctly.
--Bids will be evaluated 100% based on the cost of design works, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305557_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.9 KB

This document specifies essential tender submission conditions, requiring, among other things, the inclusion of a responsible person's confirmation, correct submission of the tender cost, and justified marking of business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305557_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Osula school building design tender, focusing 100% on the cost of design works, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305557_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.7 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's requirements for the economic operator's qualification and the information to be submitted electronically.

TK Lisa 3 – juurde_ lühikokkuvõtePDF
1684 ESLA Osula kool lühikokkuvõte.pdf -- 692.6 KB

This document is a summary of the energy-saving solutions audit for Osula School building, mapping the building's energy consumption, proposing specific technical solutions, and calculating investment payback periods.

TK Lisa 3 – DeltaE Insenerid OÜ koostatud Osula kooli energiasäästmislahenduste ...PDF
1684 TK Lisa 3_ESLA Osula kool.pdf -- 11.5 MB

This document is an energy saving solutions audit for Osula School, prepared by DeltaE Insenerid OÜ, analyzing the building's energy consumption, HVAC systems, and indoor climate.

HD Lisa 1-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
HD Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus (TK).doc -- 75.0 KB

This document details the technical requirements and specifications for the design of the Osula school building.

HD Lisa 2-Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt_Osula koolihoo... -- 38.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the design services of Osula school building, defining the contracting parties, contract documents, and terms for resolving ambiguities.

Lisa 3_VORM – vastutava isiku nõusolekDOC
Lisa 3_VORM – vastutava isiku nõusolek.docx -- 15.3 KB

This form is a consent from a responsible person, confirming that the bidder may use their indicators to prove technical and professional competence and that they agree to participate in the contract's execution.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Pakkumuse kutse-HD.docx -- 38.6 KB

```json
{
"summary_ee": "See dokument sisaldab Võru Vallavalitsuse riigihanke "Osula koolihoone projekteerimine" pakkumuse koostamise juhiseid ja üldtingimusi.",
"summary_en": "This document contains instructions and general terms for preparing a bid for the Võru Rural Municipality Government's public procurement "Design of Osula school building".",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments satur norādījumus un vispārīgos nosacījumus piedāvājuma sagatavošanai Võru pagasta pašvaldības publiskajam iepirkumam "Osulas skolas ēkas projektēšana".",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Hanke Tingimused"
}
```

TK Lisa 1 - Tabel - Projekteerimise osad ja staadiumidXLS
TK Lisa 1 - Tabel - Projekteerimise osad ja s... -- 10.7 KB

This table outlines the required design parts and their respective stages (preliminary design, main design, working design) for the Osula school building project.

TK Lisa 2 -Tabel - ruumimudelXLS
TK Lisa 2 -Tabel - ruumimudel.xlsx -- 14.1 KB

This document details the required room model for the Osula school building design project, specifying existing and required areas for various classrooms and other facilities, along with renovation and planning notes.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

87
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design of Osula school building is well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements. While strong in clarity and completeness, it could enhance its sustainability focus by incorporating explicit green procurement criteria for bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance90/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, clearly defined procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and electronic submission aligns with modern procurement regulations.

Clarity90/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, supported by well-documented and understandable requirements. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% lowest price, and performance conditions are clearly referenced to the draft contract.

Completeness95/100

All essential basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. A comprehensive set of 12 documents is provided, covering all necessary requirements, technical specifications, and contractual terms, ensuring a complete tender package.

Fairness90/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). Requirements appear generic and project-specific, not tailored to a particular company, and the rationale for not splitting the tender is well-justified.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are fully supported, enhancing practicality. While a direct document URL is not provided, the e-procurement platform is indicated. Contract duration is clear, and financing refers to the available draft contract.

No direct URL for tender documents, relying on the e-procurement platform.
Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated consistently, and dates are logical. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a publicly disclosed estimated value, which is a metadata contradiction rather than a substantive issue.

Minor inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being disclosed.
Sustainability60/100

While the project's objective is inherently sustainable (designing energy-saving solutions for a school), the tender itself lacks explicit green procurement or social criteria for bidders' operations or innovative approaches in the procurement process. This limits its overall sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria for bidders.
Absence of social criteria.

Strengths

Comprehensive and clear documentation, including detailed technical specifications.
Transparent evaluation criteria based solely on the lowest price.
Robust e-procurement features, supporting electronic submission.
Clear rationale provided for not dividing the tender into parts, promoting efficiency.
Project's inherent focus on energy-saving solutions for the school building.

Concerns

Lack of explicit green procurement or social criteria for bidders' operations.
Minor data inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified: Yes' while the estimated value is disclosed.
No direct URL for tender documents, relying on the e-procurement platform.

Recommendations

1. Integrate explicit sustainability criteria for bidders, such as environmental management certifications or sustainable practices.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' field if the estimated value is publicly disclosed to avoid potential confusion.
3. Provide a direct link to the tender documents if possible, in addition to the e-procurement platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline