Skip to main content
Tenders

Development and testing resources

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305548
Value
€3,600,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost50%
Quality (previous experience, competence, interview, trial work)50%
Team member competenceQuality
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€3,600,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€187,707
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
1,029 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Acquisition of development and testing resources to fill various software development roles within the contractor's project teams. The technical description is attached (Annex 1).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids will be evaluated based on cost (50%) and quality (50%).
--Lowest price and best quality receive the most points.
--Evaluation methodology includes cost and team member competence criteria.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but standard procurement law applies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a legal entity.
--Must have an annual net turnover of at least EUR 60,000.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Ability to provide development and testing resources for various software development roles.
--Compliance with specified technological requirements.
--Potential to fulfill described roles.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Annual net turnover of at least EUR 60,000.
--Tender value: EUR 3,600,000.0
--Duration: 36 months

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305548_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids based on cost (50%) and quality (50%), with the lowest price and best quality receiving the most points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305548_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.7 KB

The Procurement Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Juhised ja info taotlejatelePDF
Juhised_ja_info_taotlejatele_0.pdf -- 153.3 KB

Tervisekassa invites applicants to join a dynamic purchasing system for development and testing resources, requiring an annual net turnover of at least 60,000 euros.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa_1_Tehniline_kirjeldus_0.pdf -- 64.7 KB

The contracting authority is seeking development and testing resources for various software development roles, specifying technological requirements and potential role descriptions.

Lisa 2.1. AndmekaitsekokkulepePDF
Lisa_2_1_Andmekaitsekokkulepe.pdf -- 78.7 KB

This document is a Data Processing Addendum (DPA) that governs the processing of personal data according to GDPR and the contract, and must be submitted during the tender process.

Lisa 2. LepinguprojektDOC
Lisa_2_Lepinguprojekt.docx -- 45.1 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms of a contract for development and testing resources, including the subject matter, validity, cost, and settlement.

Lisa 3. HindamismetoodikaPDF
Lisa_3_Hindamismetoodika_0.pdf -- 69.2 KB

This document outlines the evaluation methodology, including cost and team member competence criteria, used in tenders organized under a dynamic purchasing system.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for development and testing resources offers a good level of clarity and fairness, with a clear evaluation methodology and electronic submission. However, it lacks specific sustainability criteria and some documentation is not readily accessible for AI analysis.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including a proper CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. There are no explicit mentions of disputes. The procedure type (DP) indicates a dynamic purchasing system, which is generally compliant with regulations.

Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the required development and testing resources. Key requirements are documented, including evaluation criteria and submission details. The technical description is referenced, indicating where further detail can be found.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and submission deadline. However, the full content of all 8 documents is not immediately available for detailed analysis, and the ESPD is in an unsupported XML format. The 'Required: No' status for some key documents like the Technical Specification and Contract Draft is a minor concern.

Full content of all documents not readily available for analysis.
ESPD in unsupported XML format.
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an e-procurement system and electronic submission, promoting accessibility. The evaluation criteria, split 50/50 between cost and quality, are objectively defined with a clear weighting. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair competitive environment. The value is disclosed.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission, which is practical. A contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the accessibility of all required documents, particularly those marked as not required but important, may pose a practical challenge.

Lack of detailed financing information.
Potential practical challenges in accessing all relevant documentation.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are consistently populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The timeline, including reveal date, submission deadline, and contract start date, appears logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. This area presents a significant opportunity for enhancement.

Absence of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social responsibility or innovation.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria (50% cost, 50% quality).
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined CPV code and reasonable deadlines.
Disclosure of estimated value.

Concerns

Limited explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.
Incomplete accessibility of all document content for detailed analysis.
Some critical documents marked as 'Not Required'.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or social impact criteria into the evaluation.
2. Ensure all relevant tender documents are fully accessible and clearly marked as required if essential for bidding.
3. Provide more details on financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline