← Back to Tenders
Estonia7 days leftOpen

Procurement of overlay welding service for equipment and their parts

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Enefit Industry OÜ

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€100,000

DEADLINE

February 09, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Services

CPV CODE

50530000-9

REFERENCE

305420

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Ostetakse seadmete ja nende osade pealesulatamis teenus.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer must not have been convicted of crimes.
  • The tenderer must not have tax debt.
  • The tenderer must not be subject to sanctions.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must provide proof of completing at least two similar contracts within the last 36 months.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include a technical specification of the proposed service.
  • The bid must include reports on previous works regarding lifespan extension.
  • The bid must include warranty conditions.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must be submitted using the price offer form, detailing unit prices and total sums for service works.
  • Bids will be evaluated 100% based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum number of points.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must be submitted via e-procedure.
  • The bid must include a confirmation of the contract terms.
  • The bid must include the completed price offer form (Pakkumuse vorm.xlsx).
  • The bid must include the completed form for the list of previous contracts (Vorm_Lepingute nimekiri.docx), detailing contract name, performance period, cost, brief description, and client contact details.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305420_vastavustingimused.pdf3.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the bid submission conditions, requiring a technical description, reports on previous work demonstrating extended lifespan, warranty conditions, confirmation of contract terms, and a completed bid price form.
XLS
Pakkumuse vorm
Esitamise VormidPakkumuse vorm.xlsx19.2 KB
Summary:
This proposal form is for bidders to submit unit prices and total sums for overlay welding materials and services, which will then be transferred to the evaluation criteria form.
DOC
Vorm_Lepingute nimekiri
ViitedVorm_Lepingute nimekiri.docx21.0 KB
Summary:
This form requires the bidder to submit a list of previous contracts, including the contract name, execution period, value, brief description, and client contact details.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305420_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines that bids will be evaluated 100% based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum number of points according to the submitted tender form.
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305420_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...5.4 KB
Summary:
This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debt, sanctions) and qualification conditions, requiring proof of completing at least two similar contracts within the last 36 months.
PDF
Juhised pakkujatele
Hanke TingimusedJuhised pakkujatele_Lihthange.pdf695.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the general conditions for a simplified procurement, detailing the e-procurement process, requirements for submitting tenders, and the contracting authority's rights regarding negotiations and tender cancellation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

72
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for overlay welding services demonstrates good transparency and fairness, utilizing e-procurement and clear cost-based evaluation. However, the inability to analyze critical technical and contractual documents in .zip format limits a full assessment of clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears legally compliant for a simplified procedure, with a reasonable submission period of 13 days, correctly assigned CPV codes, and no detected disputes or suspensions. The procedure type (LM) aligns with the estimated value of 100,000 EUR, falling below typical EU thresholds.

Clarity65/100

While the AI-extracted requirements, description, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated, the content of critical documents such as 'Töövõtu raamlepingu projekt' (Contract Framework Project) and 'Tehniline kirjeldus' (Technical Description) could not be analyzed due to their .zip file format. This significantly hinders a comprehensive assessment of the overall clarity of technical specifications and performance conditions.

•Critical technical and contractual documents are in unanalyzed .zip files, limiting full clarity assessment.
Completeness60/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and location are comprehensively provided. However, the inability to process the content of the 'Töövõtu raamlepingu projekt' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus' .zip files means that the detailed completeness of technical requirements and contract terms cannot be fully verified, despite the documents being listed as attached.

•Content of critical technical and contractual documents (in .zip format) could not be processed, impacting verification of detailed completeness.
Fairness90/100

The tender exhibits high fairness, with a disclosed value, electronic submission, and objective 100% cost-based evaluation criteria. The eligibility requirements (two similar contracts in 36 months) are reasonable and do not appear tailored to a specific company, promoting broad participation.

Practicality70/100

Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. While the contract duration is clear, specific financing and payment conditions are referenced within the unanalyzed 'Töövõtu raamlepingu projekt' .zip file, reducing immediate accessibility of this practical information.

•Specific financing and payment terms are contained within an unanalyzed .zip file, reducing immediate accessibility.
Data Consistency85/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. A minor inconsistency exists where the metadata states 'relative_weighting' for evaluation criteria, but the document summary clearly specifies '100% based on cost'. This is a minor metadata discrepancy, as the actual evaluation method is clearly defined in the documents.

•Minor inconsistency between evaluation criteria metadata ('relative_weighting') and document content ('100% cost-based').
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social aspects included.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% cost-based).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility.
Value disclosed and requirements appear generic, fostering fair competition.
Basic tender information is comprehensive and consistent.
Reasonable qualification requirements for the service type and value.

Concerns

Critical technical specifications and contract terms are in unanalyzed .zip files, hindering full assessment of clarity and completeness.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Specific financing/payment terms are not immediately visible due to unanalyzed document.
Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria metadata vs. document content.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in easily accessible and machine-readable formats (e.g., PDF) to enhance transparency and ease of analysis for bidders.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where relevant, even for simplified procedures, to promote broader public value.
3. Harmonize metadata fields (e.g., evaluation criteria type) with the actual content of the tender documents to avoid minor inconsistencies.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
72/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes