Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of IT services

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305404
Value
€130,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 29, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Monthly service cost per user (Part 2)100%
Service cost (Part 1)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 16, 2026

Tender Opening

February 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€130,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
82
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€187,707
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
1,029 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hanke OSA 1: Tõrva Vallavalitsusele ja hallatavatele asutustele arvutitehnika kasutamise teenuse osutamine koos IT-tugiteenustega. Hanke OSA 2: Tõrva valla koolinoortele ja õpetajatele arvutitehnika ja tarkavara kasutamise teenuse osutamine, IT-tugi, andmete pilveteenus ning regulaarsete veebiseminaride korraldamine ja riigi poolt planeeritud e-eksamitele üleminekuks ettevalmistumine
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

25 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (10)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The electronic ESPD must be filled out in a separate information system.
--If submitting a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders is required.
--Rules for marking business secrets must be followed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The ESPD contains qualification requirements and potential mandatory exclusion grounds that bidders must familiarize themselves with and complete in the electronic information system.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must familiarize themselves with the conditions and qualification requirements described in the ESPD.
--Bidders must agree to the terms and conditions outlined in the draft IT service contract.
--All references to standards or other bases in the procurement documents must be read as "or equivalent".
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Provide an e-environment for ordering laptops, desktop computers, and monitors (Part 1).
--Provide IT support services to Tõrva Rural Municipality Government and its institutions (Part 1).
--Provide IT services for Tõrva municipality schools (Part 2).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated based on the lowest monthly service fee per user (excluding VAT) for both procurement lots.
--The monthly fee for Part 2 must include a computer device, Microsoft 365 A1 license, cloud service, web trainings, transport, IT support, and data removal.
--The monthly fee for Part 1 must include a computer, IT support services, and data removal.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305404_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 11.3 KB

This document specifies bid submission conditions, covering joint bidder power of attorney, rules for marking business secrets, confirmation of bid compliance, and requirements for price proposal formatting.

Hinnapakkumise vormDOC
Hinnapakkumise vorm Osa 1.docx -- 19.3 KB

This price quote form requires bidders to submit the lowest monthly fee per service user, including a computer, IT support services, and data removal, which will be the basis for tender evaluation.

Hinnapakkumise vormDOC
Hinnapakkumise vorm Osa 2.docx -- 19.5 KB

This form is required for tender submission, where bidders must enter the monthly IT service fee per user, including a computer device, Microsoft 365 A1 license, cloud service, web training, transport, IT support, and data removal, serving as the basis for evaluating the lowest price.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305404_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 6.1 KB

This document specifies that IT service tender offers will be evaluated solely based on the lowest monthly service cost per user (excluding VAT) for both parts of the procurement, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305404_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.3 KB

This document is an explanatory ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) outlining the conditions and qualification requirements for Tõrva Municipality's IT service procurement, which bidders must review, as the electronic ESPD is to be completed in a separate information system.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
IT-teenus hankeleping.docx -- 22.8 KB

This document is a draft IT service provision contract, outlining the parties, scope of services based on the tender's technical specifications and the bidder's offer, and the obligations and rights of the parties.

Osa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Osa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 32.9 KB

This tender seeks an e-environment for ordering laptops, desktops, and monitors, along with IT support services for Tõrva Vallavalitsus and its institutions for a three-year period, with an option for extension.

Osa 2 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Osa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 29.4 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications for IT services for Tõrva municipality schools, requiring a compact monthly service including personal hardware (laptops/desktops), Windows 11, Microsoft 365 A1 or equivalent, cloud storage, central security policy management, and cybersecurity webinars for approximately 200 students and teachers.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

82
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for IT services is well-structured and highly transparent, particularly in its clear requirements and fair evaluation criteria. While generally robust, minor inconsistencies and a lack of explicit sustainability focus are noted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure type (Open), and proper CPV code assignment. The inclusion of an 'or equivalent' clause for standards enhances compliance with procurement principles. A minor inconsistency exists with 'Negotiation Allowed' being flagged for an Open procedure.

•Inconsistency: 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure'.
Clarity90/100

The tender exhibits excellent clarity. The description is unambiguous, requirements are well-documented and understandable, and evaluation criteria (lowest monthly service fee per user) are explicitly specified. Performance conditions are clearly referenced, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive.

Completeness85/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all basic information, estimated value, and a clear duration of three years with an extension option. All relevant documents are attached. The main gaps are the missing NUTS code and more precise location details for service delivery beyond the organizational names.

•Missing NUTS code.
•Missing more precise service delivery location details.
Fairness95/100

Fairness is a strong aspect of this tender. Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price), and e-procurement is enabled. Requirements, including the 'or equivalent' clause for software, appear generic and not tailored.

Practicality75/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and clearly specifying the contract duration. Financing information refers to the draft contract. While the e-procurement system implies document access, direct URLs for individual documents are not provided, and an explicit contract start date is absent.

•No explicit contract start date.
•Direct URLs for individual documents not provided (though accessible via e-procurement system).
Data Consistency85/100

Data consistency is good, with most key fields populated and no disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include the 'Negotiation Allowed' flag for an Open procedure and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the value being disclosed.

•Inconsistency: 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure'.
•Inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' despite estimated value being disclosed.
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social aspects included.

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical specifications for both procurement parts.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria based on the lowest monthly service fee.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for standards, promoting fair competition.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Comprehensive set of tender documents, including draft contract and price forms.

Concerns

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Missing NUTS code and more specific service delivery location details.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
'Value Classified: Yes' flag is confusing despite the estimated value being disclosed.
Duplicate XML ESPD documents.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic in the context of an Open Procedure to avoid ambiguity.
2. Provide a NUTS code and more precise location details for service delivery.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes