Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Design of Reconstruction Works for Substitute Care Family Homes in Vinni Small Town

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305393
Value
€20,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Design works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 17, 2026

Tender Opening

February 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€20,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71220000-6 — Architectural design services
Procedure
Simplified procedure
Budget
€20,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
74
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Riigihanke objektiks on peatöövõtu korras Vinni alevikus Päikese tn asuvate peremajade osalise rekonstrueerimise projekteerimine eesmärgiga saavutada hoonete suurem energiatõhusus.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the bid by 2026-02-17 11:00:00.
--Adhere to the simplified procurement procedure rules and general conditions for bid submission.
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney for joint bidders.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Must meet the exclusion conditions specified by Vinni Vallavalitsus in the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must meet the qualification conditions specified by Vinni Vallavalitsus in the ESPD.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be capable of providing architectural design services for the reconstruction of family homes for replacement care in Vinni rural municipality.
--Must be capable of applying for a building permit as part of the project scope.
--Must complete the design works within 6 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include the cost of the design works.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305393_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.1 KB

Bidders must adhere to submission conditions, including providing a joint bid power of attorney, declaring business secrets, confirming compliance with tender documents, and submitting costs in the specified structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305393_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that tender evaluation will be based solely on the cost of design works, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305393_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the qualification and exclusion criteria set by Vinni Rural Municipality Government for the design tender of family homes.

Hankelepingu eelnõuPDF
Hankelepingu eelnõu.pdf -- 157.6 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the design of foster care family homes reconstruction in Vinni rural municipality, outlining the rights and obligations of the client and contractor, the object of the contract, and the scope of work, including obtaining building permits.

Lihthankemenetluse kordPDF
Lihthankemenetluse kord.pdf -- 67.6 KB

This document outlines the simplified procurement procedure and general conditions for submitting a bid for the design of reconstruction works for family homes providing replacement care in Vinni.

Projekteerimise lähteülesanne koos lisadegaZIP
Projekteerimise lähteülesanne koos lisadega.z... -- 80.3 MB

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

74
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with a clear project description and transparent financial conditions, but requires clarification on evaluation criteria and better accessibility of critical document content.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and the submission deadline is reasonable (11 days). There are no detected disputes or suspensions. The main concern is a minor inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).

•Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Clarity70/100

The tender description and AI-extracted requirements are clear. Performance conditions are appropriately referred to the draft contract. However, the contradiction regarding evaluation criteria creates ambiguity. The content of the critical design brief (Document 5, .zip) was not available for AI analysis, limiting a full assessment of detailed clarity.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
•Content of the critical design brief (.zip file) not available for AI analysis.
Completeness70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. Requirements and criteria are defined across various documents. However, the content of the critical design brief (Document 5, .zip) is not available for AI analysis, which prevents a comprehensive review of the detailed scope of work.

•Content of the critical design brief (.zip file) not available for AI analysis.
Fairness85/100

Full document access is indicated, the estimated value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable. The evaluation criteria, once clarified as lowest price, are objective and transparent. E-procurement is enabled, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Practicality75/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. Financing information is available in the draft contract, and the contract duration is clearly specified. The absence of an explicit document URL in the provided data is a minor practical detail.

•No explicit document URL provided in the input data.
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are detected. The primary inconsistency lies in the description of the evaluation criteria.

•Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Sustainability60/100

The tender explicitly includes green procurement and is EU-funded, which are positive aspects. The project itself (energy efficiency for foster care homes) has an inherent social dimension. However, explicit social and innovation criteria for bidders are not integrated into the tender requirements.

•Lack of explicit social criteria.
•Lack of explicit innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear project description and purpose (energy efficiency for foster care homes).
Transparent financial information (estimated value disclosed).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Explicitly includes green procurement and is EU funded.
Reasonable submission deadline for a simplified procedure.

Concerns

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Content of critical design brief (.zip) and ESPD (.xml) not available for AI analysis, limiting full assessment of detailed scope.
Lack of explicit social and innovation criteria in the tender requirements, despite the project's social nature and EU funding.

Recommendations

1. Clarify and explicitly state the exact evaluation criteria to avoid any ambiguity.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents, especially the design brief, are provided in an easily accessible and machine-readable format for comprehensive review.
3. Consider integrating explicit social and innovation criteria into future tenders, especially for EU-funded projects with inherent social impact.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes