Design works for flood risk prevention measures

This tender for flood prevention design works in Tartu is generally well-structured and clear, providing essential information and utilizing e-procurement. However, it exhibits a notable data inconsistency regarding the estimated value and lacks explicit sustainability criteria in the procurement process.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable submission deadlines, a clearly defined open procedure, and appropriate CPV codes. It explicitly requires adherence to EU sanctions and uses the ESPD, aligning with national and EU procurement regulations.

The project description is highly clear and unambiguous, detailing the objectives and scope of the design works. Requirements are well-documented and understandable, leveraging the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), and evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% price-based.

The tender is comprehensive, providing all basic information, financial details, timeline, and location. All necessary documents are attached, and requirements and evaluation criteria are thoroughly defined, ensuring bidders have sufficient information.

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, electronic submission, and objective 100% price-based evaluation criteria. Requirements appear generic and not tailored, and the estimated value is disclosed, enhancing transparency for potential bidders.

Electronic submission is fully supported, and the e-procurement portal URL is provided for access and opening. The contract duration is clearly specified, contributing to practical planning for bidders.

While most data fields are consistently populated and dates are logical, there is a significant contradiction between the stated 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, which impacts overall data reliability.

The tender scores low on sustainability as it does not explicitly incorporate green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus within its requirements. While the project itself addresses environmental flood prevention, the procurement process misses opportunities for broader sustainability integration.