Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Preparation of the detailed plan for the Pekoluite property and its adjacent area in Laoküla, Lääne-Harju Municipality

Closed

Updated October 15, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304924
Value
€15,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 14, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 14, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 26, 2026

Tender Opening

January 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€15,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71240000-2 — Architectural, engineering and planning services
Budget
€15,000
Duration
26 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
83
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hanke eesmärgiks on leida Lääne-Harju vallas Laokülas Pekoluite kinnistu (tunnus 43101:001:1407, pindala 3,83 ha, sihtotstarve: 100% ühiskondlike ehitiste maa) ja lähiala detailplaneeringu koostaja
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

30 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (13)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (11)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS13
--Bids must be submitted by 2026-01-26 11:00:00.
--Bidders must submit an application for participation (template provided).
--Bidders must electronically complete and submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must be able to provide documents proving the absence of exclusion grounds, if requested.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must electronically complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) to prove their qualification and compliance with the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must accept the terms and legal framework of the draft contract.
--Bidders must be able to provide documents proving their qualification, if requested.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--The detailed planning must meet all technical requirements and objectives specified in the "Tehniline kirjeldus.docx" document.
--The detailed planning must establish building rights for a sea camp.
--The detailed planning must ensure access.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The successful bidder will be chosen solely based on the lowest total cost.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

14 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304924_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.5 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, rules for marking business secrets, subcontractor involvement, general tender compliance, and the structure for presenting the tender cost.

Kas ettevõtja saab kinnitada, et pakkumus vastab hanke alusdokumentides sätestat...DOC
Hankes osalemise avaldus.docx -- 53.7 KB

This document is an application for participation, requiring bidders to confirm their offer's compliance with tender conditions, its validity, and their ability to provide supporting documents for qualification and absence of exclusion grounds, including specific instructions for joint bids.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304924_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the bid evaluation methodology, stating that the successful bidder will be selected solely based on the lowest total cost, which constitutes 100% of the evaluation criteria.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304924_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 41.1 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide to the conditions and requirements of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which companies must complete electronically to demonstrate their qualification and compliance with the contracting authority's terms.

Lääne-Harju Vallavolikogu 17.06.2025 otsus nr 47SIG
Detailplaneeringu algatamine ja keskkonnamõju... -- 560.3 KB

No summary available for this document.

Detailplaneeringu eskiisPDF
Detailplaneeringu eskiis.pdf -- 154.7 KB

This document is a sketch of the Pekoluite property's detailed plan, outlining the planning area boundaries, existing objects, access points, and building and environmental restriction zones.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.doc -- 83.5 KB

This document is the draft contract for the preparation of the detailed plan for the Pekoluite property and its surrounding area in Laoküla, Lääne-Harju municipality, outlining the terms and legal framework of the future agreement.

Lähteseisukohad detailplaneeringuleDOC
Lähteseisukohad detailplaneeringule_Pekoluite... -- 1.1 MB

This document outlines the starting points for the detailed plan, aiming to establish building rights for a sea camp, reduce the building exclusion zone, note the need for access road easements, and specifies the planning area's location and size.

Planeeringuala kitsendusedPDF
Planeeringuala kitsendused.pdf -- 180.5 KB

This document describes the restrictions of the Pekoluite planning area, which are important for the preparation of the detailed plan.

Planeeringuala skeem juurdepääsudegaPDF
Planeeringuala skeem juurdepääsudega.pdf -- 117.1 KB

This document is a scheme illustrating the boundaries and access points of the detailed planning area, providing essential context for understanding the scope of the planning project.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
RHAD - juhised pakkujale.docx -- 61.9 KB

This document is the basis document for Lääne-Harju municipality's small procurement, providing instructions to bidders for preparing the detailed plan for Pekoluite property and its surrounding area.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 18.2 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements and objectives for preparing a detailed plan for the Pekoluite property and its surrounding area in Laoküla, Lääne-Harju municipality, including establishing building rights for a sea camp and ensuring access.

Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 52.6 KB

This document is a sample power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one person to represent the joint bidders in the public procurement, sign the offer and contract, and confirms the joint and several liability of the joint bidders.

VolikiriDOC
Volikiri pakkuja esindamiseks.docx -- 51.1 KB

This document is a power of attorney template required to authorize an official representative of the bidder to sign the tender submission and the procurement contract.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

83
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a detailed planning service is well-structured with clear objectives and extensive supporting documentation. However, its sole reliance on the lowest price for evaluation, without explicit quality criteria, raises concerns about achieving the best value for money for a complex planning project.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender appears legally compliant, incorporating standard elements like mandatory exclusion grounds, ESPD, and rules for subcontractors. The use of lowest price as the sole evaluation criterion is permissible for well-defined services.

Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the project's purpose and objectives. Technical requirements are well-defined through references to numerous specific supporting documents, enhancing clarity for bidders.

Completeness100/100

The tender is comprehensive, covering all essential procurement aspects from basic information and financial details to detailed technical requirements and submission instructions. The extensive list of supporting documents further contributes to its completeness.

Fairness80/100

The tender promotes fairness through standard eligibility requirements and a transparent, albeit price-focused, evaluation criterion. There are no indications of requirements being tailored to a specific company.

Practicality60/100

Electronic submission and a 26-month contract duration are practical for this type of service. The reliance on existing detailed documents for technical specifications provides a solid practical framework for bidders.

Data Consistency100/100

The information provided across the tender, including the description, requirements, and evaluation criteria, appears consistent and coherent.

Sustainability0/100

The tender lacks explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, representing a missed opportunity to integrate broader public policy objectives into the procurement process.

•Absence of sustainability criteria
•Absence of social criteria

Strengths

Clear and well-defined project description and objectives.
Comprehensive set of referenced supporting documents for technical specifications.
Standardized and transparent procurement process elements (ESPD, electronic submission).
Well-defined scope and constraints for the planning area.
Transparent evaluation criterion (lowest total cost).

Concerns

Sole reliance on lowest price for a detailed planning service, potentially compromising quality and optimal outcomes.
Lack of explicit quality criteria or technical evaluation beyond adherence to documents, limiting the ability to select the best value solution.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations, missing opportunities for broader public value.
Potential ambiguity in evaluating qualitative objectives like 'reducing the building exclusion zone' under a purely price-based model.

Recommendations

1. For future planning tenders, consider incorporating quality-based evaluation criteria alongside price to ensure best value for money and optimal project outcomes.
2. Explore integrating relevant sustainability, social, or innovation criteria to align procurement with broader public policy goals.
3. Ensure that qualitative objectives are either translated into highly specific, measurable technical requirements or evaluated through a quality component.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes