Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Improving the energy efficiency of Narva Central Library located at Malmi tn 8

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304772
Value
€194,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 26, 2026

Tender Opening

February 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€194,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71320000-7 — Engineering design services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€194,000
Duration
11 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
89
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Finding a provider of design services for the reconstruction of the Narva Central Library building.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks design services for energy efficiency improvements at Narva Central Library. Given the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, a strong technical proposal demonstrating deep understanding of building physics and energy systems, coupled with a competitive price, will be paramount. Focus on demonstrating value beyond basic compliance.

Key Winning Messages

Proven Expertise in Public Building Energy Efficiency Design

Cost-Effective and Sustainable Design Solutions

Seamless Project Delivery and Client Collaboration

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the Energy Audit Report (if accessible) to demonstrate a deep understanding of the building's specific issues and propose tailored solutions.
Proposing innovative, yet practical, energy-saving measures that go beyond the minimum requirements, showcasing added value.
Highlighting experience with similar public sector projects in Estonia, demonstrating familiarity with local regulations and procurement practices.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy for scoring. Bidders must infer likely priorities.

Assume technical merit and price will be key. Focus on a comprehensive technical proposal that clearly articulates value and a competitive pricing strategy. Benchmark against similar tenders if possible.

Inability to analyze .asice files for the energy and building audit reports limits direct insight into the building's specific problems.

If possible, obtain readable versions of these reports. If not, clearly state in the bid that the proposal is based on the provided technical description and general best practices for similar building types, while expressing readiness to conduct further detailed site analysis during the design phase.

Relatively low estimated value might attract price-sensitive bidders, potentially leading to a race to the bottom on price.

Balance competitive pricing with a strong emphasis on the long-term value and cost savings of the proposed energy efficiency measures. Highlight the quality and durability of the design.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized architectural or engineering firm with a proven track record in public building renovations, specifically focusing on energy efficiency upgrades. The ideal bidder will possess strong technical expertise in building diagnostics, HVAC, insulation, and renewable energy integration, along with experience in public procurement processes in Estonia.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (ESPD)
Detailed Technical Design Brief for Energy Efficiency Improvements
Understanding of Existing Building Conditions (from audit reports)
Adherence to Draft Procurement Contract Terms
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated understanding of the specific challenges of older public buildings and tailored solutions.
A clear methodology for integrating energy efficiency measures that minimizes disruption to library operations.
A proactive approach to risk management and stakeholder engagement during the design phase.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider proposing design solutions that could indirectly support local employment during the subsequent construction phase, or design for future adaptability that could serve community needs.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Proposal (implied)

Develop a highly detailed and well-structured technical proposal that directly addresses the requirements in Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldus. Emphasize a phased approach to design, clear methodologies for energy analysis, and specific recommendations for HVAC, insulation, lighting, and potential renewable energy integration. Showcase expertise in building physics and energy modeling.

Price (implied)

Offer a competitive price that reflects the scope of work and estimated value. Conduct thorough cost estimation, considering potential unforeseen issues. Avoid being the lowest bidder if it compromises the quality or feasibility of the proposed design. Justify the price by highlighting the long-term cost savings and return on investment from the energy efficiency measures.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Address Exclusion Grounds
CriticalLow effort

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously addressed in the ESPD. Any omission or error here will lead to immediate disqualification.

Ensures eligibility to be evaluated.
Infer and Prioritize Likely Evaluation Criteria
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, infer that technical competence, understanding of the brief, and price will be key. Structure the bid to excel in these areas, providing clear evidence of expertise and a well-justified price.

Maximizes chances of a favorable outcome despite unspecified criteria.
Demonstrate Deep Understanding of Building Physics
HighMed effort

Go beyond generic energy efficiency solutions. Show a nuanced understanding of the Narva Central Library's specific structural and technical system issues as outlined in Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldus. Propose solutions that are technically sound and contextually appropriate.

Sets the bid apart from less specialized competitors.
Proactive Approach to Missing Audit Data
HighLow effort

If the .asice audit reports cannot be accessed, acknowledge this limitation upfront in the bid. State that the proposal is based on the provided technical description and general best practices, and outline a plan for detailed site investigations during the design phase to confirm assumptions.

Manages expectations and demonstrates transparency.
Competitive Pricing with Value Justification
MediumMed effort

Develop a competitive pricing strategy that reflects the estimated value. However, do not solely focus on being the cheapest. Clearly articulate the long-term economic benefits and return on investment of the proposed energy efficiency measures to justify the proposed cost.

Balances cost-competitiveness with perceived value.
Consider Indirect Social Value
LowLow effort

Although social aspects are not required, subtly highlight how the proposed design might indirectly benefit the community, such as by creating a more comfortable and modern public space or by potentially supporting local construction jobs during the implementation phase.

Adds a positive, albeit secondary, dimension to the bid.
Clear Project Management and Communication Plan
MediumMed effort

Outline a robust project management approach, including clear communication channels with the Narva City Government's Urban Economy Department. This demonstrates professionalism and a commitment to a smooth design process.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most technically competent and reliable partner for delivering a high-quality, cost-effective energy efficiency design for a public institution. Emphasize a deep understanding of building science and a pragmatic approach to problem-solving, rather than just offering a generic service.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not be subject to any exclusion grounds as specified in the ESPD.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

15 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304772_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.3 KB

This document outlines the conditions for bid submission, including requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of bid compliance, and cost presentation.

Lisa 3. Pakkumuse maksumustabelDOC
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumustabel.docx -- 579.7 KB

This document is a tender cost table template that bidders must complete with design work costs, including VAT and notes on the scope of works.

Vorm 2. Osalemise taotlusDOC
Vorm 2 Osalemise taotlus.docx -- 11.7 KB

This form is an application for participation where the bidder confirms acceptance of tender conditions, the binding nature of their offer, and provides their contact details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304772_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the total bid cost is the sole evaluation criterion for the tender, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304772_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) detailing the qualification and exclusion criteria for the design services tender for improving the energy efficiency of Narva Central Library, which bidders must complete electronically.

Energiaauditi aruanneSIG
Energiaauditi aruanne Narva Keskaamatukogu 08... -- 3.5 MB

No summary available for this document.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 1.6 MB

This document is the basic tender document for an open procurement procedure by Narva City Government Department of City Economy, concerning the acquisition of services for improving the energy efficiency of Narva Central Library.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Projekteerimise lähteülesanne Malmi 8_... -- 14.8 MB

This document describes the existing condition of the Narva Central Library building, previous works, and provides a detailed design brief for improving energy efficiency, highlighting structural and technical system issues to be considered in the design.

Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 2.9 MB

This document is the draft procurement contract for the design work of the Narva Central Library's energy efficiency improvement project, outlining the scope of work, terms, and obligations of the parties.

Lisa 4. Hoone ruumiprogrammXLS
Lisa 4 Narva Keskraamatukogu hoone ruumiprogr... -- 25.4 KB

This document outlines the room program for the Narva Central Library's energy efficiency improvement project, detailing room areas, purposes, existing conditions, and new requirements such as internet connectivity and a shelter.

Ehitise korralise auditi aruanneSIG
Malmi 8, Narva_2025-28a c-1.asice -- 2.3 MB

No summary available for this document.

Ehitise korralise auditi aruande lisaSIG
Malmi 8, Narva- Lisa tööle 2025-28.asice -- 295.4 KB

No summary available for this document.

Ehitise korralise auditi aruande tööSIG
Malmi tn 8, Narva, Töö nr 2025-28-1.asice -- 2.0 MB

No summary available for this document.

ProjekteerimistingimusedSIG
Projekteerimistignimused.asice -- 1.3 MB

No summary available for this document.

Vorm 1. Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 9.8 KB

This form is for joint bidders to authorize one partner to act on their behalf in the procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

89
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design of energy efficiency improvements for Narva Central Library is well-structured and highly transparent, particularly regarding its evaluation criteria and legal compliance. While strong on green procurement due to its core objective, it could benefit from more explicit social and innovation considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance90/100

The tender demonstrates a high level of legal compliance, with clearly defined procedure type, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes or suspensions. The use of ESPD and EU funding further indicates adherence to national and EU procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable.

Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are exceptionally unambiguous and transparent. While the AI-extracted requirements are general, the summaries of other documents suggest comprehensive and understandable requirements are available within the full tender package.

•AI-extracted requirements are very general, potentially indicating a need for more explicit detail in the main documents (though summaries suggest otherwise).
Completeness90/100

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is comprehensively provided. The tender includes a full set of documents, such as a draft contract, technical specifications, and required forms, ensuring a complete package for bidders.

•Some documents are in formats not analyzable by AI (.xml, .asice), which limits automated review depth but does not imply incompleteness of the tender itself.
Fairness95/100

The tender exhibits excellent fairness, with full disclosure of value, reasonable preparation time, and highly objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled, and there is no indication of requirements being tailored to a specific company; the justification for not dividing into lots is also reasonable.

Practicality85/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, provides a URL for the opening place, and clearly specifies contract duration and EU funding. The absence of an explicit contract start date is common and does not significantly hinder practicality.

•Specific contract start date not explicitly provided, though this is often determined post-award.
Data Consistency98/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent across the timeline, indicating a well-managed and accurate data set.

Sustainability70/100

The core objective of improving energy efficiency directly aligns with green procurement principles, making this tender inherently sustainable in that aspect. However, explicit social criteria and innovation focus are not detailed, which could enhance its overall sustainability profile.

•Lack of explicit social and innovation criteria beyond the core energy efficiency objective.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
High level of legal compliance, including EU funding and ESPD use.
Comprehensive documentation provided, covering all key aspects.
Strong data consistency and logical timeline.
Project inherently contributes to green procurement through energy efficiency.

Concerns

AI-extracted requirements are very general, potentially indicating a need for more explicit detail in the main documents (though summaries suggest otherwise).
Lack of explicit social and innovation criteria beyond the core energy efficiency objective.
Some documents are in formats not analyzable by AI, which limits automated review depth.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly incorporate social clauses or community benefits into the tender documents.
2. Consider adding criteria or encouraging innovative solutions for energy efficiency beyond standard approaches.
3. Ensure all key requirements are easily identifiable and explicitly stated within the main tender documents for maximum clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes