Ultrasound devices (re-procurement for parts 2 and 3)
ClosedOriginal Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
21 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
8 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines tender submission requirements, including providing contact person details, submitting a power of attorney for joint bids, declaring business secrets, and confirming compliance with EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers.
This document is a tender cost form to be completed for the offer of ultrasound devices and related maintenance services, requiring the total cost to be entered into the evaluation criteria worksheet.
This offer form details the minimum technical requirements for an ultrasound machine for breast and gynecological examinations, requiring bidders to provide their details, proposed device specifications, a medical device declaration, and readiness for a demo device test.
This document details the minimum technical specifications for an ultrasound machine for gynecological and fetal examinations, requiring bidders to complete an offer form, confirm compliance, and be prepared to provide a demo device for testing.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria and weighted proportions for ultrasound machine bids (parts 2 and 3), covering offer price (40%), image quality and usability (58%), and technical specifications exceeding minimum requirements (2%).
This document is an explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's conditions for exclusion grounds and qualification requirements, intended for review and not for direct submission.
This document is a draft procurement contract for the acquisition and maintenance of ultrasound devices, outlining general terms, party obligations, and expected supplier qualifications.
This document is the general part of the tender documents for Aktsiaselts Ida-Tallinna Keskhaigla's repeat procurement of ultrasound devices (reference number 304769), outlining general tender information, participation conditions, division into parts, and references to technical specifications and other appendices.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for ultrasound machines demonstrates good clarity and fairness with well-defined evaluation criteria and electronic submission. However, it has moderate completeness and practicality concerns due to missing contract duration and specific location details, and lacks explicit sustainability considerations.
Score Breakdown
The tender exhibits good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no reported disputes. It explicitly requires adherence to EU sanctions. While the procedure type 'A' is generic, the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic provides context, and the presence of ESPD and detailed requirements aligns with national and EU procurement principles.
Clarity is strong, with a concise description and comprehensive AI-extracted requirements covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified with weighted proportions in Document 3, directly contradicting the automated flag. Technical specifications in Lisa I and II are detailed and understandable.
Most essential information, including basic details, deadlines, and estimated value, is present, and all 9 documents are attached. However, the tender lacks explicit contract duration and specific location information (NUTS code is missing), which are important for full completeness.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and enabled e-procurement. Evaluation criteria are transparent, including a significant weight for image quality and usability, which will be assessed via demo devices, fostering objective comparison. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission is supported, and a URL for the opening place is provided. However, the practicality is moderately impacted by the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration. Financing information beyond the estimated value is also limited.
Data consistency is good, with key fields mostly populated and logical, consistent dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency is the automated flag regarding missing evaluation criteria, which is disproven by the document content.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, nor is it indicated as EU funded. While common for standard equipment procurement, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required