Reconstruction of Suurenõmme-Kohatu roads
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €700,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45233140-2 — Roadworks
- Procedure
- Open procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
11 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
10 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract performance phase, focusing on the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring them to submit a procurement passport and demonstrate reliability.
Bidders must confirm tender compliance, adhere to the cost submission structure, provide a power of attorney for joint bids, and submit a mandatory 1500 EUR tender guarantee.
This document is a price proposal form for the Suurenõmme-Kohatu road reconstruction tender, requiring bidders to provide work descriptions, volumes, unit prices, and total amounts.
This document specifies that bids will be evaluated 100% based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses regarding exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, but this specific PDF does not need to be submitted.
This tender document outlines the general terms, scope of work, legal basis, and deadlines for the "Suurenõmme-Kohatu teede rekonstrueerimine" road reconstruction public procurement, referencing specific projects and legislation.
This document details the technical requirements for the reconstruction of several forest roads in Saue and Kohila municipalities, including felling, stump removal, culvert construction, embankment compaction, and specifications for pavement material and thickness.
This document is a draft contract outlining the scope of work for the reconstruction of Suurenõmme-Kohatu roads, detailing the rights and obligations of both the contracting authority and the contractor, and referencing the underlying projects and legal acts.
No summary available for this document.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline, but suffers from a critical inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and a lack of explicit contract duration.
Score Breakdown
The tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations, utilizing standard documents like ESPD and providing reasonable deadlines. However, the procedure type 'A' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic are not fully aligned with the stated 100% lowest price evaluation, creating a minor ambiguity.
The project description and technical requirements are clear and detailed. However, a significant clarity issue arises from the contradiction between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic in the basic information and the explicit '100% based on total cost' evaluation stated in Document 7. This could confuse bidders.
Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and detailed requirements, is provided. However, the explicit contract duration is not clearly stated in the basic information or AI summaries, which is a notable omission for bidders planning.
The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and electronic submission. The evaluation criteria, once clarified to be 100% lowest price, are objective. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. However, the absence of a clear contract duration makes it challenging for bidders to accurately plan resources and project timelines, impacting the practicality of bid preparation and project execution.
Most data fields are populated and dates are logical. The primary and critical inconsistency lies in the conflicting statements regarding evaluation criteria: 'relative_weighting' in the characteristics versus '100% based on total cost' in the dedicated evaluation criteria document.
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social, or innovation-focused criteria. It appears to be a standard infrastructure project without specific sustainability objectives.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required