Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of Dog Supplies

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
304464
Value
€130,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the shopping basket excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 26, 2026

Tender Opening

March 26, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€130,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the purchase of supplies for the Contracting Authority's service dogs and dog handlers, including delivery, based on a framework agreement, according to the contracting authority's needs for four years from the conclusion of the procurement contract. A framework agreement will be concluded with up to three bidders.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for service dog supplies presents a strong opportunity for bidders focused on cost leadership and operational efficiency. Success hinges on meticulously aligning the offer with the detailed 'Shopping Basket' and demonstrating superior delivery speed and customer support within the Estonian market.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective, Reliable Supply for Essential Service Dog Needs

Seamless Procurement Experience with Localized Support and Rapid Delivery

Key Opportunities
Dominance in price for the 'Shopping Basket' items.
Leveraging existing efficient logistics networks within Estonia for fast delivery.
Establishing a strong relationship with the contracting authority through superior customer support.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the evaluation being solely on total cost.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore bulk purchasing discounts from manufacturers and optimize internal operational costs to offer the most competitive pricing for the 'Shopping Basket' items.

Meeting potentially stringent 'fast delivery times' expectations.

Clearly define and communicate delivery timeframes based on realistic operational capabilities. Highlight existing infrastructure and partnerships that guarantee prompt delivery within Estonia.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established supplier of pet or animal care products with a robust e-commerce platform, proven fast delivery capabilities within Estonia, and a dedicated Estonian-language customer support team. Experience in supplying to public sector organizations or large institutions would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Delivery of items specified in the technical description (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus)
Estonian-language e-shop
Customer support
Fast delivery times
Offer evaluation based on total cost of the shopping basket (Lisa 2 Ostukorv.xlsx)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably superior delivery speed and reliability compared to competitors.
A highly intuitive and user-friendly Estonian-language e-shop with excellent customer support responsiveness.
A comprehensive and accurate understanding of the specific product needs outlined in 'Lisa 2 Ostukorv.xlsx', with competitive pricing across the entire basket.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to sourcing a percentage of products from local Estonian suppliers or manufacturers, contributing to the local economy. This can be framed as a value-add beyond the core requirements.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost of Shopping Basket100%

Achieve the absolute lowest total price by meticulously pricing every item in 'Lisa 2 Ostukorv.xlsx'. This requires detailed cost breakdown, supplier negotiations, and efficient operational planning. Any deviation from the lowest price will significantly impact the score.

Recommendations5
Master the 'Shopping Basket' Pricing
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive analysis of 'Lisa 2 Ostukorv.xlsx'. Source all items at the most competitive prices possible. Factor in all direct and indirect costs to ensure the lowest possible total offer price. This is the single most important factor for scoring.

Directly determines the maximum score for the evaluation criterion.
Demonstrate Unrivaled Delivery Speed
CriticalMed effort

Clearly articulate and evidence your capability for fast delivery within Estonia. This could involve showcasing existing logistics hubs, delivery fleet capabilities, or partnerships with rapid courier services. Quantify delivery times where possible.

Meets a key technical requirement and can be a subtle differentiator if superior.
Optimize Estonian E-shop and Support
HighMed effort

Ensure the Estonian-language e-shop is intuitive, user-friendly, and reflects a deep understanding of the product range. Highlight the responsiveness and expertise of your Estonian-speaking customer support team as a key benefit.

Meets technical requirements and enhances user experience, potentially leading to repeat business.
Thoroughly Review Base Documents
HighMed effort

The tender repeatedly refers to 'base documents' for exclusion grounds, qualification conditions, and submission requirements. A comprehensive review of all referenced documents (e.g., 'vastavustingimused.pdf', framework agreement draft) is essential to avoid disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures full compliance.
Proactive Qualification Checks
MediumMed effort

Before submitting, ensure all eligibility and qualification requirements (turnover, previous contracts) are met and documented. Utilize the 'Hankepass' self-declaration effectively, but be prepared to provide supporting certificates if requested.

Ensures the bid is considered valid and meets minimum standards.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective and operationally efficient supplier, emphasizing the direct benefit to the Police and Border Guard Board's budget. Highlight the seamless procurement process enabled by the e-shop and customer support, freeing up the authority's resources.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must refer to the tender's base documents for qualification conditions, such as turnover requirements and previous sales contracts.
--Bidders must refer to the document "vastavustingimused.pdf" for information on submitting joint offers, marking business secrets, confirming compliance with offer conditions, cost structure, and principles of equivalence.
--Offers will be evaluated based on the total cost of the shopping basket.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must refer to the tender's base documents for exclusion grounds and qualification conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must refer to the tender's base documents for exclusion grounds and qualification conditions.
--The "Hankepass" (tender pass) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial proof in lieu of certificates issued by authorities or third parties.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The supplier must be capable of delivering the items specified in the technical description.
--The supplier must provide an Estonian-language e-shop.
--The supplier must provide customer support.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries, refer to base documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304464_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.6 KB

This document clarifies for bidders the submission of joint offers, marking of trade secrets, confirmation of offer compliance with conditions, cost submission structure, and principles of equivalence, which are necessary for successful bid submission.

Lisa 2 OstukorvXLS
Lisa 2 Ostukorv.xlsx -- 403.2 KB

This document details the shopping cart, forming part of the submission criteria for the procurement of dog accessories.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304464_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority, the Police and Border Guard Board, will evaluate bids for the purchase of dog supplies based on the total basket cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304464_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.2 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses.

Hankemenetluse läbiviimise lisateavePDF
Hankemenetluse labiviimise lisateave.pdf -- 357.9 KB

Additional information on conducting the procurement procedure outlines qualification requirements, such as turnover and prior sales contracts, and bid evaluation based on total cost.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 436.0 KB

The contracting authority, the Police and Border Guard Board, seeks a framework agreement partner for purchasing service dog supplies, requiring an Estonian e-shop, customer support, and prompt delivery times.

Raamlepingu projektPDF
Raamlepingu projekt.pdf -- 550.5 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for the purchase of dog supplies by the Police and Border Guard Board, outlining the terms and purpose of the agreement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for dog supplies is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it relies heavily on external documents for crucial details, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The reliance on external documents for qualification and exclusion grounds is a minor point of concern for immediate legal clarity.

Clarity80/100

The core description of the tender is clear, outlining the need for dog supplies under a framework agreement. However, many specific requirements (qualification, exclusion, technical details) are deferred to external documents, reducing overall clarity within the main tender notice.

Key requirements deferred to external documents.
Completeness70/100

While basic information like title, organization, and estimated value are present, crucial details regarding qualification criteria, exclusion grounds, and specific technical requirements are only accessible through attached documents. This makes the tender notice itself less complete.

Qualification and exclusion grounds not detailed in the main notice.
Technical specifications are only summarized.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for up to three bidders in a framework agreement, which is a reasonable limit. The evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). There is no indication of tailoring requirements to specific companies. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-submission and e-procurement, which is positive. However, the extensive reliance on external documents for essential information (qualification, technical specs, shopping basket) makes the practical execution of bid preparation more cumbersome. The contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Heavy reliance on external documents for critical information.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social criteria.

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value.
Reasonable submission and opening deadlines.
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).

Concerns

Crucial details (qualification, exclusion, technical specs) deferred to external documents.
Limited sustainability considerations.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Consolidate essential qualification and technical requirements within the main tender notice for better clarity and completeness.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline