Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of Mõisa Bridge on road 23198 Ala-Taagepera-Raiksilla, km 2.63-2.96

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
304460
Value
€450,000
Location
Estonia
Published
December 31, 2025
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 31, 2025

Deadline for Questions

January 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 27, 2026

Tender Opening

January 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€450,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45221100-3 — Construction work for bridges
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€450,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
87
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

23198 Ala-Taagepera-Raiksilla km 2,63-2,96 Mõisa silla ehitus vastavalt riigihanke alusdokumentides toodud tingimustele.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The bidder must submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) as per the guide.
--The bidder must provide relevant information about subcontractors.
--The submission of the bid must take into account the specific technical conditions for bridge construction work.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--First-tier subcontractors must meet exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering, human trafficking).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--The bidder must meet the qualification requirements set by the contracting authority, as described in the ESPD completion guide.
--The bidder must accept the terms of the draft road construction contract.
--The bidder must comply with the general conditions specified in the procurement document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must comply with the specific technical conditions for bridge construction work.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of bridge construction, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The bidder must submit proposed unit prices and total costs for general works and site preparation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304460_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract performance phase, detailing the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors (e.g., fraud, money laundering, human trafficking) and requiring the tenderer to provide relevant information regarding them.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304460_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document outlines general bid submission conditions, requiring bidders to confirm acceptance of terms, submit a completed cost list, declare any business secrets, and provide a power of attorney for joint bids.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 29.5 KB

This document is a cost list template for the Ala-Taagepera-Raiksilla Mõisa bridge construction project, requiring bidders to detail their proposed unit prices and total costs for general works and site preparation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304460_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document outlines that tenders will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of the bridge construction, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304460_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.9 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements for the "Ala-Taagepera-Raiksilla km 2,63-2,96 Mõisa silla ehitus" tender, but it is for informational purposes only and not for direct submission.

HD III ProjektdokumentatsioonZIP
HD III Projektdokumentatsioon.zip -- 47.8 MB

No summary available for this document.

HD III Teetööde tehnilise kirjelduse eritingimusedDOC
HD III Teetoode tehnilise kirjelduse eritingi... -- 42.7 KB

This document outlines the special conditions of the technical description for bridge construction works, detailing specific requirements for tender submission and project execution.

HD II Lepingu projektDOC
HD II Leingu projekt.docx -- 63.6 KB

This document is a draft road construction contract for the Mõisa bridge project, outlining the parties, scope of work, and appendices that will form part of the final agreement.

HD II Lepingu lisadZIP
HD II Lepingu lisad.zip -- 343.9 KB

No summary available for this document.

HD I VormidZIP
HD I Vormid.zip -- 43.6 KB

No summary available for this document.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.0 KB

This document outlines the general terms of the public procurement, including contracting authority contact details, electronic tender procedures, geographical restrictions for bidders, and requirements for joint bidders and those relying on third-party resources.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

87
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

The tender for Mõisa bridge construction appears generally well-structured with standard requirements and a clear lowest-price evaluation. However, potential geographical restrictions and the lack of explicit integration of green procurement criteria into evaluation warrant closer scrutiny.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender generally adheres to standard EU procurement principles regarding mandatory exclusion grounds and electronic submission. However, the inclusion of unspecified 'geographical restrictions for bidders' could potentially violate principles of non-discrimination and free movement if not adequately justified.

•Potential non-compliance with EU principles of non-discrimination and free movement if geographical restrictions are not adequately justified.
Clarity80/100

Basic information, submission requirements, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) are clearly stated. However, the summary of technical capability requirements is very general, relying heavily on external documents for specific details.

•Vague 'specific technical conditions' in the extracted requirements, necessitating detailed review of full tender documents.
Completeness100/100

The tender appears comprehensive with 12 associated documents, including ESPD guidance and evaluation criteria. This suggests that detailed information is available within the full tender package.

•The provided extracted requirements lack sufficient detail on the specific technical conditions for bridge construction, which are crucial for bidders to formulate comprehensive proposals.
Fairness100/100

The lowest price evaluation criterion is transparent. However, the mention of 'geographical restrictions for bidders' raises concerns about potentially limiting competition and favoring specific local companies, which could be perceived as unfair or tailored.

•The requirement for bidders to comply with 'any geographical restrictions' could unfairly limit competition and potentially tailor the tender for specific local entities.
Practicality60/100

The tender utilizes electronic submission and standard documentation like the ESPD and a cost list, which are practical for bidders and streamline the submission process.

Data Consistency100/100

Information provided, such as the lowest price evaluation, is consistent across the description and document summaries.

Sustainability25/100

The tender is marked as 'Green Procurement,' which is a positive characteristic. However, the evaluation criteria are solely price-based, and there's no explicit mention of how green aspects, social criteria, or innovation will be weighted or integrated into the final decision, potentially limiting the practical impact of the 'Green Procurement' label.

•The 'Green Procurement' characteristic is not explicitly integrated into the evaluation criteria, which are solely price-based.
•Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria in the evaluation framework.

Strengths

Clear project scope, title, and financial details.
Comprehensive documentation with 12 associated documents.
Mandatory exclusion grounds extended to first-tier subcontractors.
Utilizes electronic submission and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
Explicitly marked as Green Procurement.

Concerns

Potential for unfair competition due to unspecified 'geographical restrictions for bidders', which could be seen as tailoring.
Evaluation solely based on the lowest price may not fully capture best value for a complex infrastructure project, especially given the 'Green Procurement' characteristic.
Lack of explicit detail in the extracted technical capability requirements, making it difficult to assess the project's technical demands.
The 'Green Procurement' characteristic is not explicitly integrated into the evaluation criteria, potentially reducing its impact.
Absence of explicit social or innovation criteria in the tender's evaluation framework.

Recommendations

1. Provide clear and robust justification for any geographical restrictions, or remove them, to ensure fair and open competition in line with EU procurement principles.
2. Integrate specific, measurable green procurement criteria, and potentially social or innovation aspects, into the technical specifications and/or evaluation methodology to ensure a more holistic value assessment.
3. Ensure the full tender documents provide highly detailed and unambiguous technical specifications for bridge construction to enable accurate and comparable bids.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes