Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Implementation of a trauma-informed approach in foster, adoptive, and guardianship families

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Special
Reference
304272
Value
€48,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 22, 2026

Tender Opening

January 22, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€48,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
80510000-2 — Specialist training services
Lots
Divided into lots
Budget
€48,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Special
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,129
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
246 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hanke eesmärk on leida pakkuja, kes viib läbi koolituse „Traumateadliku lähenemise rakendamine hooldus-, lapsendaja- ja eestkosteperedes“. Hange hõlmab koolituse ette valmistamist ja läbiviimist, sh ettepanekute tegemist õppekava projektile ning õppematerjalide tagamist koolitusel osalejatele.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

30 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (5)
Technical (8)
Financial (5)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Submit a detailed training plan according to the provided form and requirements.
--Submit a detailed cost table covering total tender cost, cost per training group, cost per follow-up meeting, and a breakdown of individual personnel costs.
--Submit confirmation that the bidder is not subject to exclusion grounds listed in RHS § 95 lg 1 and lg 4.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not be subject to the exclusion grounds listed in RHS § 95 lg 1 and lg 4.
--Bidders must not have a conflict of interest.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm that they are not subject to the exclusion grounds listed in RHS § 95 lg 1 and lg 4.
--Bidders must confirm that they do not have a conflict of interest.
--Bidders must meet location-based qualification requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The training plan must describe topics, learning methods, outcomes, and assessment criteria.
--The training content must align with the Social Insurance Board's supplementary training curriculum project.
--The training must address the specified objectives, target group (foster, adoptive, and guardianship families), content, and learning outcomes for trauma-informed training.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS5
--The detailed cost table must cover the total tender cost.
--The detailed cost table must cover the cost per training group.
--The detailed cost table must cover the cost per follow-up meeting.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304272_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of offer compliance with basic documents, and adherence to the specified cost structure.

Lisa 3 Koolituskava vormDOC
Lisa_3_Koolituskava_vorm.docx -- 25.8 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed training plan, describing topics, learning methods, outcomes, and assessment criteria according to the provided form and requirements.

Lisa 5 Maksumuse tabelXLS
Lisa_5_Maksumuse_tabel.xlsx -- 16.8 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost table covering the total tender cost, the cost per training group and follow-up meeting, and a breakdown of individual personnel costs.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304272_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 10.2 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and weighted indicators for bids, focusing on the cost of training and follow-up meetings, and the quality and content of the training plan.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
304272_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.6 KB

This document specifies the exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for bidders, requiring companies to confirm that they are not subject to the exclusion grounds listed in RHS § 95 lg 1 and lg 4, nor have a conflict of interest.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa_1_Tehniline_kirjeldus.pdf -- 240.3 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements, target group, objectives, learning outcomes, and content for a training course on "Implementing a trauma-informed approach in foster, adoptive, and guardianship families" to find a suitable training provider.

Lisa 2 Õppekava projektPDF
Lisa_2_Oppekava_projekt.pdf -- 320.5 KB

This document is the Social Insurance Board's supplementary training curriculum project, detailing the objectives, target group, content, and learning outcomes of trauma-informed training for foster, adoptive, and guardianship families.

Lisa 4 kogemuse vormDOC
Lisa_4_Kogemuse_vorm.docx -- 19.0 KB

This form collects detailed information on an individual's education, work experience in foster care and/or crisis work, and adult trainer competencies, including specific training conducted in the last three years, to demonstrate the bidder's qualifications for the tender.

Lisa 6 Käsunduslepingu projektPDF
Lisa_6_Kasunduslepingu_projekt.pdf -- 458.6 KB

This document is a draft service agreement outlining the terms for providing training services and payment conditions that the successful bidder will agree to.

Lisateave väikehanke juurdePDF
Lisateave_vaikehanke_juurde.pdf -- 384.8 KB

This document provides general information about the contracting authority, tender name, and reference number, defines location-based qualification requirements for bidders, and includes instructions for preparing and submitting bids, including principles for business secrets and equivalence.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but it has notable gaps regarding contract duration and specific service delivery location.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with a reasonable 10-day submission deadline, clear procedure type, and appropriate CPV code. It references national procurement law (RHS) and has no reported disputes. The primary minor issue is the missing NUTS code.

•Missing NUTS code
Clarity80/100

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented, detailed, and linked to specific forms and technical specifications. Evaluation criteria are outlined in Document 10, focusing on cost and quality, which enhances clarity.

Completeness70/100

Basic information, deadlines, and estimated value are provided. However, the tender lacks a clear contract duration and specific service delivery location. While all necessary documents are attached, these omissions reduce overall completeness.

•Missing contract duration
•Missing specific service delivery location details
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective evaluation criteria. E-procurement and electronic submission ensure equal access. The 'Divided into Parts' characteristic further enhances competition. Personnel requirements, though specific, appear justified for the specialized service.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the absence of a firm contract start date and, critically, the contract duration, reduces practicality for bidders. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided, though implied by e-procurement.

•Missing contract duration
•Contract start date is 'expected' rather than firm
Data Consistency90/100

The tender exhibits good internal data consistency, with logical dates and no disputes. The contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit estimated value, along with the automated flag for 'Missing evaluation criteria' (which contradicts Document 10's summary), are metadata inconsistencies rather than issues within the tender documents themselves.

•Inconsistency in 'Value Classified' metadata
•Automated check flag for 'Missing evaluation criteria' contradicts Document 10 summary
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement' and the service itself (trauma-informed care for foster families) has strong inherent social value. However, there is no explicit focus on innovation, and it is not EU funded.

•No explicit innovation focus
•Not EU funded

Strengths

Clear and detailed service description
Comprehensive set of tender documents, including forms and draft agreement
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility
Explicitly states 'Green Procurement' and has significant social value
Evaluation criteria are outlined (as per Document 10 summary), focusing on cost and quality

Concerns

Missing explicit contract duration
Missing specific service delivery location details (beyond 'location-based qualification requirements' and NUTS code absence)
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit estimated value provided
Specific personnel qualification requirements, while likely justified, could potentially narrow the field of bidders
Automated check flagged 'No evaluation criteria specified' which contradicts the summary of Document 10

Recommendations

1. Clearly specify the contract duration in the tender notice or main documents.
2. Provide explicit details regarding the service delivery location.
3. Ensure all metadata fields, such as 'Value Classified' and 'Evaluation Criteria,' accurately reflect the content of the tender documents to avoid confusion.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes