Self-dilating supra-annular aortic valve for small valves and VIV
ClosedOriginal Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
20 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
7 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the mandatory conditions and formats for submitting a tender proposal, including technical requirements, cost structure, necessary supporting documents, and rules for joint bids.
This is a mandatory cost form for submitting product codes, names, technical parameters, manufacturer details, quantities, unit prices, and total costs for the offered self-dilating supra-annular aortic valves.
This document details the technical specifications for transcatheter aortic valves (TAVI) and related equipment, along with instructions for tender submission and the process for testing offered products.
This document is a tender submission application where the bidder confirms having reviewed and accepted the procurement terms, and has accounted for all costs and obligations in the tender price.
This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that the total cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion with a 100% weighting, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.
This document serves as an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria for bidders, but it is for informational purposes only and not for submission.
This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms for the supply and sale of catheter-implantable aortic valves and their installation tools to SA Põhja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla until November 30, 2027, with a possibility of extension.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
Overall, the tender is well-structured with clear evaluation criteria, but significant concerns arise from the ambiguous procedure type and severely limited competition.
Score Breakdown
The tender demonstrates compliance with general legal frameworks, including reasonable submission deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. However, the procedure type is ambiguously defined as 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' with N/A codes, which is a notable deviation from standard procurement terminology.
The tender's description is specific, and requirements are comprehensively detailed across various categories. The evaluation criteria, based solely on the lowest total cost (excluding VAT) with 100% weighting, are exceptionally clear and unambiguous.
Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, financial details, and deadlines, is provided. While the framework agreement duration is specified, a distinct 'contract duration' field could be clearer. One XML document was listed but not analyzed by AI, representing a minor gap in content processing.
The 'Max Participants: 1' characteristic, combined with the highly specialized nature of the product and the explicit statement that the procurement is not divided into parts, raises significant concerns about severely limited competition and potential tailoring of requirements. While evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price), the restricted pool of potential bidders compromises fairness.
The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility. Key dates such as the contract start date and financing information are clearly provided, contributing to practical execution.
Dates and financial figures are logical and consistent throughout the tender. The primary inconsistency lies in the non-standard and ambiguous 'Type: A' and 'Procedure: A' codes for the procurement process.
The tender lacks any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This is a common omission in highly specialized medical device procurements but results in a low score for this category.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required