Tenders

Design of Tarvastu school building

Open
Deadline
2 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
303526
Value
€120,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the bid100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Tender Opening

March 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€120,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to prepare a construction project at the main project stage for the new Tarvastu school building, including the compilation of a bill of quantities and the estimation of construction costs within the scope specified in the tender documents (including the preparation of a demolition project for the existing educational building).
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender must include the total cost of the offer.
--A power of attorney must be submitted for joint tenderers.
--Business secrets must be marked in the tender according to the rules.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not be on the EU sanctions list or otherwise associated with sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must confirm compliance with all procurement documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tenderer must be capable of preparing the new construction project for Tarvastu school building according to the technical specification.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing design work using the general contracting method.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing design work including a demolition project, interior architecture, technical systems, and obtaining building permits.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., turnover, insurance) are mentioned in the summaries of the procurement documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
303526_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.0 KB

This document sets out tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, rules for marking business secrets, and confirmation of compliance with tender documents and EU sanctions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303526_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points according to the provided formulas.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303526_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.8 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's qualification conditions and expected responses from the undertaking, but it is for familiarization only and not for submission.

Juhised pakkujaleDOC
Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 27.4 KB

This document provides general instructions to tenderers for the Tarvastu school building design procurement, including contact details, funding sources, contract duration, and a list of all tender documents.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 54.5 KB

This technical description outlines the purpose, scope, and technical requirements for preparing the design project of the new Tarvastu school building, including existing building data.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 48.5 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the scope and terms of work for the design of the Tarvastu school building, including the demolition project, interior architecture, technical systems, and obtaining building permits.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design of the Tarvastu school building is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-procurement. While it includes green procurement aspects, there are minor inconsistencies in procedure definition and a lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with national regulations, utilizing ESPD and referencing relevant acts. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are generally appropriate. However, the procedure type 'A' (likely Open Procedure) combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' creates a slight ambiguity regarding the exact procurement process.

Ambiguity in procedure type ('A') vs. 'Negotiation Allowed'
Clarity80/100

The project description, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable. The only minor point affecting clarity is the slight ambiguity in the procedure type as noted in legal compliance.

Slight ambiguity in the exact procurement procedure type due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'A' type procedure.
Completeness70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. A good number of supporting documents are provided. However, the tender lacks explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., minimum turnover) which are common for projects of this scale. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag is also contradictory to the disclosed estimated value.

Lack of explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover)
Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Fairness85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, price-based evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. The duration is clearly specified. However, a direct URL to the tender documents is not explicitly provided (though implied via the e-procurement portal), and an explicit contract start date is missing.

No explicit contract start date provided
Direct URL to tender documents not explicitly provided in the basic information
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicting the disclosed estimated value, and the procedure type vs. negotiation allowance.

Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' and 'Negotiation Allowed'
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific social criteria or an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No specific social criteria mentioned
No innovation focus mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Comprehensive documentation provided (7 documents)
Full support for e-procurement and electronic submission
Explicit inclusion of Green Procurement characteristics
Reasonable submission deadline and transparent access to information

Concerns

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (likely Open) and 'Negotiation Allowed'
Contradiction: 'Estimated Value: 120,000.00 EUR' vs. 'Value Classified: Yes'
Lack of explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover) for tenderers
Absence of specific social or innovation criteria
No explicit contract start date provided

Recommendations

1. Clarify the exact procurement procedure type and its compatibility with 'Negotiation Allowed' to avoid ambiguity.
2. Resolve the contradiction regarding the classified status of the estimated value.
3. Consider incorporating specific social and innovation criteria to enhance sustainability aspects beyond just 'green procurement'.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline