Supply of packaging timber

This tender for sawn timber supply presents significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness due to restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value, despite clear basic information and defined requirements.

While deadlines are reasonable, the procedure is clear, and the CPV code is appropriate, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, potentially violating transparency and equal treatment principles mandated by procurement regulations. The undisclosed estimated value is also a transparency issue.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are specified in Document 3, despite a conflicting flag. However, the overall clarity is hampered by the restricted access to full documents.

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided, and essential documents are listed. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a notable omission for bidders.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical issue that severely compromises fairness and equal treatment among potential bidders. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency. While evaluation criteria are objective, the fundamental barrier to information access is a major concern.

Electronic submission is indicated (though contradicted by automated checks), and contract duration is clear. However, the lack of a specific contract start date, undisclosed value, and the 'Restricted document access' reduce the overall practicality for bidders.

Several inconsistencies exist, notably between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag, and conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria. The 'Restricted document access' also points to a potential data access inconsistency.

The tender shows no explicit focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, and is not indicated as EU-funded. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability principles.