Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Carrying out landscaping works in Brocēni Mežaparks and Enerģijas parks

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
166006
Value
€24,793
Location
Latvia
Published
February 17, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Price (excl. VAT)60%
Technical proposal and work execution methodology30%
Key personnel qualification and experience10%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 05, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€24,793
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71500000 — Construction-related services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€24,793
Duration
3 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
70
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Carrying out landscaping works in Brocēni Mežaparks and Enerģijas parks
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a moderate opportunity for experienced landscaping service providers. Success hinges on a meticulously prepared technical proposal demonstrating clear understanding of the scope, a competitive yet profitable pricing strategy, and strict adherence to all submission requirements. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a focus on exceeding minimum requirements and presenting a highly professional and compliant bid is paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable Execution: Proven expertise in delivering high-quality landscaping services within specified parameters.

Efficient Project Management: A clear, actionable plan ensuring timely completion and optimal resource utilization.

Value for Money: A competitive bid that reflects a thorough understanding of project needs and efficient delivery.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for a strong emphasis on compliance and perceived value.
Short contract duration (3 months) and modest estimated value may deter larger, more complex competitors, potentially reducing competition.
Opportunity to showcase operational efficiency and resourcefulness due to the absence of explicit social/green/innovative requirements, allowing focus on core competencies.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid to specific scoring mechanisms.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements across all stated criteria (technical capability, financial proposal) and present a highly professional, error-free submission. Assume the contracting authority will prioritize compliance, experience, and price.

Potential for underbidding if the estimated value is not fully understood or if competitors focus solely on price without considering quality.

Develop a detailed cost breakdown based on the technical proposal and ensure the bid price is competitive but also profitable and sustainable for the project duration. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Strict adherence to submission requirements and deadlines is crucial, with potential for disqualification for minor errors.

Thoroughly review the 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' multiple times. Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents before the deadline. Ensure all documents are in Latvian if required.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized Latvian company with a proven track record in municipal landscaping projects, possessing the necessary legal registrations, qualified personnel, and appropriate equipment. They should be financially stable, capable of delivering within a tight timeframe, and adept at navigating Latvian procurement regulations.
Key Requirements
Mandatory exclusion grounds compliance
Legal registration and authorization for landscaping services in Latvia
Demonstrated relevant experience in similar landscaping works
Detailed technical proposal (methodology, work plan, timeline)
Financial proposal (bid price)
Submission in accordance with tender regulations (Nolikums) and procurement subject requirements (Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības)
Submission by the deadline: 2026-03-05 11:00:00
Key Discriminators
A highly detailed and realistic work plan with clear milestones and resource allocation.
Strong evidence of successful completion of similar-scale landscaping projects in Latvia, supported by references or case studies.
A clear and concise presentation of key personnel's qualifications and their direct relevance to the project's specific needs.
A competitive pricing strategy that demonstrates efficiency without compromising quality.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a statement about local employment opportunities or commitment to using local suppliers if feasible, presented as a voluntary commitment to community benefit.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Experience, Personnel, Equipment, Proposal)

Provide concrete examples of past projects, detailed CVs of key personnel highlighting relevant skills, a comprehensive list of well-maintained equipment, and a clear, logical work plan that addresses all aspects of the procurement requirements. Emphasize efficiency and timely completion.

Financial Proposal (Bid Price)

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that reflects realistic resource needs and labor. Ensure the price is competitive but also sustainable, demonstrating value for money. Avoid overly aggressive pricing that might raise quality concerns.

Compliance and Documentation

Meticulously follow all instructions in the 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'. Ensure all required documents are included, correctly formatted, and submitted in the specified language (likely Latvian) before the deadline. Conduct thorough quality checks to eliminate errors.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze Tender Documents
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant time to understanding the 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'. Identify all mandatory requirements, submission formats, and any implicit expectations from the contracting authority.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Focus on Demonstrating Experience and Capability
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, strongly emphasize past performance on similar landscaping projects. Provide detailed case studies, client testimonials (if permissible), and clear evidence of successful project completion.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver.
Develop a Highly Detailed and Realistic Work Plan
MediumMed effort

Outline a clear, step-by-step methodology, a realistic timeline with milestones, and specific resource allocation for each phase of the project. This demonstrates foresight and operational efficiency.

Positions the bidder as organized and capable.
Ensure Language Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Confirm the required submission language (likely Latvian) and ensure all documentation is professionally translated and reviewed by a native speaker if necessary.

Avoids immediate disqualification due to language errors.
Conduct a Pre-Submission Review
HighMed effort

Implement a multi-stage review process involving at least two individuals to check for completeness, accuracy, and adherence to all instructions before final submission.

Minimizes the risk of errors and omissions.
Consider Voluntary Community Benefit Statement
LowLow effort

If feasible and aligns with company values, briefly mention a commitment to local employment or sourcing, framed as a voluntary contribution to the Brocēni community.

May subtly enhance the bidder's image without significant cost or effort.
Price Competitively but Realistically
HighMed effort

Base the bid price on a thorough understanding of the scope and a detailed cost breakdown. Avoid aggressive pricing that might compromise quality or profitability. Aim for a price that represents good value for the contracting authority.

Balances winning the bid with ensuring project profitability.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and experienced option, emphasizing a proven track record in similar municipal landscaping projects. Highlight operational efficiency and a clear, executable plan to deliver high-quality results within the tight timeframe. Present a competitive price that reflects value for money, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the project's needs and efficient resource management.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit an application in accordance with the tender regulations (Nolikums).
--Submit a detailed technical proposal for the landscaping works.
--Submit a financial proposal (bid price).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by Latvian public procurement law (e.g., criminal convictions, bankruptcy, grave professional misconduct, unpaid taxes).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered and authorized to perform landscaping services in Latvia.
--Bidders must meet any administrative requirements detailed in the tender regulations (Nolikums).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must demonstrate relevant experience in performing landscaping works of similar scope and complexity to Brocēni Forest Park and Energy Park.
--Bidders must provide details of key personnel, including their qualifications and experience relevant to the project.
--Bidders must provide a list of equipment and machinery available for the execution of the works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal (bid price) for the landscaping works, adhering to any specified format or breakdown.
--Bidders must meet any specified financial stability requirements (e.g., minimum annual turnover, financial ratios) as detailed in the tender regulations (Nolikums).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166006_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260217155541.pdf -- 95.0 KB

This document contains the procurement requirements for the landscaping works of Brocēni Forest Park and Energy Park, detailing submission requirements for application, technical and financial proposals, other documents, and evaluation criteria.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums.docx -- 2.4 MB

This document contains the tender regulations for landscaping works at Brocēni Forest Park and Energy Park, issued by the Kurzeme Planning Region, detailing administrative information, procurement subject, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

Automated quality analysis based on rule-based checks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Clarity60/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Completeness91/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Fairness40/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Practicality40/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Data Consistency100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Sustainability25/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Strengths

No specific strengths identified

Concerns

No specific concerns identified

Recommendations

No specific recommendations

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes