Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of BD Glucan Test kits

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018466-2026
Value
£92,075
Location
United Kingdom
Published
August 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£92,075
Duration
12 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tender for the supply of BD Glucan Test Kits to the University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust for a period of 1 year.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
018466-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
018466-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
018466-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects. The submission deadline appears feasible.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic regulatory requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines seem reasonable given the scope. No explicit disputes or regulatory issues are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required goods (BD Glucan Test Kits) and the duration is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date are present. However, the lack of accessible document content and the missing reveal date detract from overall completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition below the threshold, promoting broad access. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed.

Practicality65/100

The tender allows for manual submission and provides a document URL, which is positive. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and detailed financing information slightly reduces practicality.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, dates, and value are populated logically. There are no flagged disputes or suspensions, ensuring good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Open competition procedure indicated
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available for review
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
No explicit mention of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly to enhance bidder understanding.
2. Upload full tender documents for transparency and ease of access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline