Provision of disinsection, disinfection, and deratization services

This tender for disinfection, disinfection, and deratization services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

The description of services is clear. Key documents outlining technical and submission requirements are referenced. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. The necessary documents (technical specifications and regulations) are attached. However, the lack of explicit exclusion and eligibility requirements could be improved.

The tender is an open procedure with disclosed value and reasonable deadlines. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential fairness issue, as not all information might be readily available to all potential bidders. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also reduces transparency.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential contradiction or a missing detail in the process, which could hinder practical submission. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logical. The CPV code is provided.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.