Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login9 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
10 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the specific grounds for exclusion that suppliers must meet to be eligible for the tender, detailing reasons for disqualification.
This document outlines the specific qualification criteria and other requirements that companies must meet to be considered for the project expertise services and the creation of a dynamic purchasing system.
This document is an application form that companies must complete and submit for the project expertise services tender to AB "Amber Grid".
This document is a required form for bidders to list the specialists proposed for providing project expertise services for AB "Amber Grid's" dynamic purchasing system.
This document outlines the detailed technical requirements for providing project expertise services to AB "Amber Grid" for the creation of a dynamic purchasing system.
This document, Appendix 7, details confidential information pertaining to categories 1-4 within the project expertise services and Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) creation tender.
This document outlines the general terms, conditions, and requirements for establishing and participating in the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for project expertise services.
This document is a consent form for a proposed subcontractor to confirm their willingness to participate in the tender for project expertise services.
This document is a consent form for proposed experts to confirm their willingness and availability to be engaged for the project expertise services.
AB "Amber Grid" is establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for project expertise services across four categories related to gas infrastructure, with an estimated value of 500,000 EUR, inviting companies to apply by March 9, 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for project expertise services demonstrates good foundational elements like clear purpose and e-procurement, but suffers from significant clarity and fairness issues due to underspecified requirements and a critical lack of explicit evaluation criteria.
The tender defines the procedure type (Restricted, 2014/25/ES) and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. The availability of documents for exclusion grounds and qualification requirements suggests adherence to legal frameworks. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the provided summary is a significant transparency concern under procurement law.
While the overall description of establishing a DPS is clear, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that 'Specific details are not provided' for mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements. Crucially, the tender summary lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their applications will be assessed.
Basic information like title, organization, reference, value, and CPV is complete. A comprehensive set of documents is listed, suggesting that detailed information exists. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of specific details for key qualification and technical aspects in the summary. The duration of the DPS itself is also not explicitly stated in the provided information.
The tender benefits from full document access, disclosed value, e-procurement, and a very generous application deadline for joining the DPS. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises the transparency and objectivity of the process, potentially leading to subjective assessment and undermining fairness for bidders.
Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. The very long application deadline provides ample time for preparation. However, the lack of explicit details regarding specific requirements and the duration of the DPS can make it less practical for bidders to prepare precise and fully compliant applications.
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with a long submission period appropriate for a DPS. The automated check's inconsistency regarding 'e-submission' versus 'E-Procurement' is noted but attributed to the automated system rather than the tender data itself.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards. This suggests a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability considerations.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required