Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of Automotive Analytical Equipment for the Development of LBTU Scientific Infrastructure

Closed

Updated October 09, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 19, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
163797
Value
€26,377
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
January 20, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Lowest Price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 12, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 19, 2026

Tender Opening

February 19, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€26,377
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
38000000 — Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses)
Procedure
Open procedure
Lots
Divided into lots
Budget
€26,377
Duration
3 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Supplies
66
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€51,295
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
2,840 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of Automotive Analytical Equipment for the Development of LBTU Scientific Infrastructure
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-02-19T10:00:00.
--Submit bidder applications as per Part 2 requirements.
--Submit technical proposals as per requirements for Parts 1, 2, 4, and 5.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Comply with all mandatory exclusion conditions/criteria as detailed in the tender regulations (NOLIKUMS) and specific requirements for Parts 1, 4, and 5.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Meet all selection criteria as detailed in the tender regulations (NOLIKUMS) and specific requirements for Parts 1, 4, and 5.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Propose analytical equipment meeting the technical requirements for gasoline and diesel engines (Part 1).
--Propose a Diesel engine smoke analyzer meeting the technical requirements (Part 2).
--Propose functional diagnostic equipment for heavy vehicles meeting the specific requirements (Part 3).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit a financial proposal for Part 1 as required.
--Submit a financial proposal for Part 2, which will be evaluated based on the lowest price.
--Submit a financial proposal for Part 4 as required.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163797_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260120053421.pdf -- 97.9 KB

This document contains procurement requirements, including exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for offers related to the acquisition of analytical equipment for gasoline and diesel engines.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163797_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260120053422.pdf -- 95.1 KB

This document outlines the procurement requirements for Part 2 (Diesel engine smoke analyzer) of the "Acquisition of analytical equipment for cars for LBTU scientific infrastructure development" tender, detailing submission requirements for bidder applications, technical and financial proposals, other documents, and evaluation criteria based on the most economically advantageous offer with the lowest price.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163797_PD.ANY_1_1_3_20260120053422.pdf -- 95.1 KB

This document contains the specific requirements for Part 3 of a procurement by the Latvian University of Life Sciences and Technologies for functional diagnostic equipment for heavy vehicles, detailing mandatory and optional submission documents, as well as the evaluation criteria for bids.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 4.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163797_PD.ANY_1_1_4_20260120053422.pdf -- 95.3 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for Part 4 of a procurement for analytical equipment, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and tender evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 5.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163797_PD.ANY_1_1_5_20260120053422.pdf -- 97.6 KB

This document contains detailed requirements for submitting a proposal, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial offer specifications, and the evaluation criteria for technical and financial proposals for part 5 of the procurement.

NOLIKUMSDOC
Nolikums_2026_15.docx -- 131.4 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open competition organized by the Latvian University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LBTU) for the acquisition of car analytical equipment to develop its scientific infrastructure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for car analytical equipment demonstrates good structural organization with detailed requirements for its various parts and is EU-funded. However, significant concerns exist regarding restricted document access for bidders and inconsistencies in data presentation, particularly concerning e-submission and evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines a clear open procedure and assigns an appropriate CPV code. The submission period is reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a significant concern for legal compliance, as it could hinder transparency and equal treatment of bidders.

•Restricted document access for bidders
Clarity80/100

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented and structured by parts. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. While the automated check flagged 'Missing evaluation criteria', document summaries explicitly mention their presence for several parts, suggesting they are defined, though perhaps not centrally summarized.

•Potential ambiguity regarding the comprehensive availability or centralisation of evaluation criteria (contradiction with automated check)
Completeness70/100

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and classification, is provided. Requirements and criteria are defined across multiple documents. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag, if true for bidders, means the tender is not fully complete from a practical access standpoint.

•Restricted document access for bidders
Fairness45/100

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical issue that severely impacts fairness and equal access for all potential bidders. While the estimated value is disclosed and the submission deadline is reasonable, this fundamental flaw undermines the principle of fair competition.

•Restricted document access for bidders
Practicality65/100

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement', which is practical, but this contradicts the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag, creating ambiguity. The lack of an explicit document URL (or the restricted access) and an unspecified contract start date are minor practical drawbacks.

•Contradiction regarding e-submission support
•Absence of a direct, accessible document URL
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, significant contradictions exist, notably between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission', 'Missing evaluation criteria' and their explicit mention in summaries, and critically, 'Restricted document access' versus the availability of document summaries for analysis.

•Contradiction regarding e-submission capabilities
•Contradiction regarding the presence of evaluation criteria
Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards. However, there are no explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria mentioned in the provided information, as confirmed by automated checks.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
•Lack of explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear division of the procurement into multiple parts with dedicated technical specifications.
Detailed AI-extracted requirements covering exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects.
EU funding indicates adherence to broader European standards.
Reasonable submission deadline for an open procedure.
Estimated value is fully disclosed.

Concerns

Critical issue of 'Restricted document access' for bidders, severely impacting fairness and legal compliance.
Contradiction regarding 'E-Procurement' characteristic versus 'No e-submission' flag.
Contradiction regarding 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag versus explicit mentions in document summaries.
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Absence of a direct document URL in the provided information.

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders to uphold transparency and fairness.
2. Clarify and resolve all data inconsistencies, especially regarding e-submission capabilities and the comprehensive availability of evaluation criteria.
3. Consider integrating specific green, social, or innovation procurement criteria, especially given the EU funding.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes