Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Development of a nature conservation plan for the protected landscape area "Vestiena"

Closed

Updated October 09, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
163270
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
February 15, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 15, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 02, 2026

Tender Opening

March 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
73300000 — Design and execution of research and development
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
17 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Services
77
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,411
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,077 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of a nature conservation plan for the protected landscape area "Vestiena"
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires a robust technical proposal demonstrating deep expertise in nature protection planning for protected landscape areas. While social value and innovation are not explicitly required, a bidder can differentiate by proactively incorporating them and demonstrating a strong understanding of the specific ecological and community context of 'Vestiena'.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in Protected Landscape Area Management and Conservation Planning.

Tailored, Evidence-Based Solutions for 'Vestiena's' Unique Ecological Needs.

Commitment to Collaboration and Sustainable Outcomes.

Key Opportunities
Proactive inclusion of social value and sustainability elements, even if not mandatory, to demonstrate forward-thinking and added value.
Leveraging the absence of specified evaluation criteria to define and emphasize the bidder's strengths and unique selling propositions within the technical proposal.
Thoroughly understanding and addressing the specific ecological characteristics and conservation challenges of the 'Vestiena' protected landscape area.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid to maximize scoring.

Analyze the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' document thoroughly for implicit priorities. Focus on demonstrating comprehensive technical capability, clear methodology, and relevant experience. Assume a balanced weighting across technical and financial aspects, with a strong emphasis on technical merit.

Potential for a highly competitive field given the nature of public procurement for environmental services.

Focus on clear differentiation through specialized expertise, a robust and well-articulated methodology, and a strong team profile. Highlight any unique approaches or technologies that can be applied, even if innovation isn't explicitly sought.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A consultancy firm with proven experience in developing nature protection plans for protected areas, particularly in Latvia or similar Baltic ecosystems. The ideal bidder will have a strong team of ecologists, landscape planners, and potentially social scientists, with a track record of successful stakeholder engagement and a commitment to evidence-based conservation strategies.
Key Requirements
Adherence to exclusion and selection criteria as outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'.
Submission of a technical proposal meeting all requirements in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'.
Submission of a financial proposal meeting all requirements in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'.
Submission by the deadline of 2026-03-02T22:00:00.
Evaluation based on criteria specified in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated understanding of the specific ecological features and conservation challenges of the 'Vestiena' protected landscape area, supported by case studies or research.
A highly experienced and multidisciplinary team with specific expertise relevant to Latvian protected areas.
A clear, logical, and actionable methodology for developing the nature protection plan, including robust stakeholder engagement strategies.
Proactive integration of sustainability principles and potential social benefits, even if not explicitly mandated.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to engaging local communities and stakeholders in the plan development process, ensuring their input is considered and fostering local stewardship of the protected area.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Proposal (Methodology, Team, Experience)

Develop a detailed, step-by-step methodology that clearly outlines how the nature protection plan will be developed. Showcase the qualifications and relevant experience of the proposed team, emphasizing their expertise in similar projects. Provide concrete examples of past successes in developing and implementing nature protection plans.

Financial Proposal

Ensure the financial proposal is competitive and clearly reflects the value and expertise offered. Provide a transparent breakdown of costs, demonstrating efficiency and good value for money.

Recommendations5
Thoroughly Review 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant time to meticulously analyze the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' document. Identify all mandatory exclusion and selection criteria, and ensure full compliance. Pay close attention to any implicit requirements or preferences that can be inferred.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Develop a Strong Technical Proposal Framework
CriticalHigh effort

Given the unspecified evaluation criteria, structure the technical proposal to highlight core strengths: a detailed and logical methodology, a highly qualified and relevant team, and proven experience in similar projects. Use clear headings and concise language.

Maximizes perceived value and technical competence.
Demonstrate Specific 'Vestiena' Area Knowledge
HighMed effort

Research the 'Vestiena' protected landscape area extensively. Incorporate specific ecological data, known conservation challenges, and potential stakeholder groups into the proposal to show a deep understanding beyond generic planning.

Positions the bidder as a knowledgeable and invested partner.
Proactively Address Sustainability and Social Value
MediumMed effort

Even though not mandatory, include a section outlining how sustainability principles will be integrated into the plan and how local communities will be engaged. This can be framed as best practice and added value.

Creates a positive impression and differentiates from less proactive bidders.
Ensure Timely Submission
MediumLow effort

Set internal milestones well before the 2026-03-02 deadline to allow for review, finalization, and submission without last-minute issues. Confirm submission portal requirements and test them in advance.

Avoids disqualification due to late submission.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a partnership focused on delivering a practical, implementable, and scientifically sound nature protection plan for 'Vestiena', emphasizing long-term ecological health and community benefit.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-03-02T22:00:00.
--Bidders must prepare technical and financial proposals according to the requirements outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības" document.
--Proposals will be evaluated based on the criteria specified in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības" document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must meet the exclusion criteria as outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības" document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must satisfy the selection criteria specified in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības" document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a technical proposal that adheres to the requirements detailed in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal that adheres to the requirements detailed in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības" document.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163270_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260215191630.pdf -- 95.7 KB

This document contains the detailed procurement requirements for the development of a nature protection plan, outlining exclusion and selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for bidders.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
MNP2026_1_nolikums_ar_pielikumiem_8.01.2026.d... -- 139.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement organized by Madona Municipality for the development of a nature protection plan for the "Vestiena" protected landscape area.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

77
Good

Tender Quality Score

Automated quality analysis based on rule-based checks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Clarity80/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Completeness100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Fairness60/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Practicality40/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Data Consistency100/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Sustainability0/100

Assessed based on automated checks.

Strengths

No specific strengths identified

Concerns

No specific concerns identified

Recommendations

No specific recommendations

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes