Tenders

2526-01-DTS-SS-YH - Student Health and Social Care Placement System

Open
Deadline
145 days left
July 26, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
016629-2026
Value
£372,000
Location
South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 19, 2026

Submission Deadline

July 26, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 26, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£372,000
Duration
36 months
Location
South Yorkshire
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The University seeks to procure a single, integrated Student Placement System to manage the full placement lifecycle, streamline processes, and reduce reliance on fragmented systems.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Student Health and Social Care Placement System is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is competitive. However, the deadline for submission is relatively short given the contract start date, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

Submission deadline may be too short relative to contract start date.
Clarity80/100

The description of the required Student Placement System is clear and concise, outlining the need for an integrated solution. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/eligibility requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the precise expectations.

Missing evaluation criteria.
No specific technical, eligibility, or submission requirements listed.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the unavailability of document content significantly reduce the completeness of the tender package for potential bidders.

No document content available.
Missing specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses a competitive procedure, promoting fairness. The access to documents is implied but not explicitly detailed. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, which is a positive indicator of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content hinder practical engagement for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission specified.
No document content available for review.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, although the submission deadline and contract start date being identical is unusual and potentially problematic.

Submission deadline and contract start date are identical.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear title and reference number.
Organization and estimated value disclosed.
Clear description of the required system.
Competitive procedure indicated.

Concerns

Missing detailed requirements (technical, eligibility, etc.).
No evaluation criteria specified.
No document content available for review.
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical, eligibility, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Include information on sustainability aspects and how they will be assessed.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline